Wikileaks To Sen. Lieberman: Eat S*#t And Die

Yeah, this worked out well for the US….

The plug was pulled as the influential senator and chairman of the homeland security committee, Joe Lieberman, called for a boycott of the site by US companies.

“[Amazon’s] decision to cut off WikiLeaks now is the right decision and should set the standard for other companies WikiLeaks is using to distribute its illegally seized material,” he said.

“I call on any other company or organisation that is hosting WikiLeaks to immediately terminate its relationship with them.”

Big balls you have there Mr. Lieberman.  What you gonna back it up with?  A few missiles?  Somehow I doubt it, considering that you’d have to start launching them into nations that aren’t exactly hostile to us – but sure do seem to be hostile toward attempts to censor these guys.

Oh wait…. you mean your bluster was all hot air?

$ dig wikileaks.org

; <<>> DiG 9.6.-ESV-R2 <<>> wikileaks.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50324
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 4

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;wikileaks.org.                 IN      A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
wikileaks.org.          3410    IN      A       46.59.1.2
wikileaks.org.          3410    IN      A       91.121.133.41

Oh look.  Two foreign addresses and none on Amazon’s cloud.

Gee, that’s sad – it took what – a whole hour?

% Information related to ‘46.59.0.0/17AS8473’

route:          46.59.0.0/17
descr:          Bahnhof Internet, Sweden
origin:         AS8473
mnt-by:         BAHNHOF-NCC
source:         RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to ‘91.121.0.0/16AS16276’

route:          91.121.0.0/16
descr:          OVH ISP
descr:          Paris, France
origin:         AS16276
mnt-by:         OVH-MNT
source:         RIPE # Filtered

That would be “Blow Me” as Wikileaks’ response to Senator Lieberman and DHS.

Now what winky-eye?

Further, I am compelled to again ask: Exactly why is it that you’re ****ed now when the other leaks previously published were much worse in terms of what they exposed?  It isn’t that Wikileaks says they have 5gb of data from a major BANK to leak, is it?

(PS: If you think getting cute with the DNS will stop them, it won’t.  I suspect you’re dumb enough to do it though, which is simply going to cause them to move things into a format you can’t trace or interdict at all, or into a TLD you can’t touch – and there are a bunch of them.  If you don’t understand how and why this stuff works please call someone who does so they can explain it to you before you make further fools out of yourselves.)

~

4closureFraud.org