The Foreclosing Adventures of Pinocchio | Two Foreclosure Cases, Four Assignments, on Same Note and Mortgage

The Foreclosing Adventures of Pinocchio

Posted by L

The industry is scrambling to clean up their mess – yes, the one that crashed the global economy & left millions of Americans jobless, homeless, dispossessed, destitute.  Their puppet politicians, regulators, & law enforcers have been, with a few notable exceptions, compliant with their marching orders.  Much of the mainstream media has likewise been deferential, willing to play it’s part as the industry-friendly propaganda machine.

Here’s how the clean up looks on a micro level.

ONE MORTGAGE in Florida to Ameripath in 2007 for $384K here.  Ameripath the originator who entered into a consent order with WA state Dept of Financial Institutions for predatory lending practices.

Strangely TWO foreclosure cases by Deutsche Bank National Trust as Trustee (each with a $1,900 filing fee) by Marshall Watson filed in 2009  Lis Pendens with case numbers Feb 2009 here and July 2009 here.

FOUR Assignments of Mortgage.  A practice in folly.

Assignment One: New Century Mortgage comes out of nowhere acting as attorney in fact for the mortgage servicer HomeEq and assigns the mortgage to Deutsche Bank

Assignment Two: Ameripath, the originator, files in 2009 an assignment of mortgage allegedly executed in 2007 from Ameripath to New Century.

Assignment Three: Is actually a refiling of Assignment Number One: New Century attorney in fact for HomeEq assigning over to Deutsche Bank.

Assignment Four: In 2010, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee (Ocwen address — what happened to HomeEq?) assigns this non-performing loan into a 2006 REMIC trust (wonder what the investors – aka 401k & pension funds – have to say about that).

The two foreclosure cases?

Case One: Docket closed (presumably someone caught on to the fact that there was another active case on the same exact issue involving the same mortgage and the same litigants).

Case Two: The most recent docket entry reveals that the judge ordered Deutsche Bank to file something of merit within 30 days of April 4, 2011 or else the case will be dismissed without prejudice.

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
17 Responses to “The Foreclosing Adventures of Pinocchio | Two Foreclosure Cases, Four Assignments, on Same Note and Mortgage”
  1. fighting mad, mad as hell says:

    http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/14239
    watch the trained monkeys, oops, puppies get trained to bark when told, to do the dirty work so the masters look innocent. Dirty dogs.

  2. l vent says:

    Michael, My recorders office also told me I would need to bring that notarized letter with me if I have to go to court. That makes me think that letter is not so insignificant. What do you think?

  3. QNY81 says:

    The whole fraud begins at the purchase. Who owned the property when the mortgage was originated? The seller. How does the buyer get a mortgage when he does not own the property?

    • l vent says:

      We rent the property from the shadow Government, Warrany Deed $10.00, Now they want the house, too. Greedy Bastards!!!

    • Bust them! says:

      HOW? APPARENTLY COUNTERFEIT MORTGAGES = MONEY LAUNDERING = FRAUDULENT FUNDS SHELTERED. STUDY NBank OF COMMERCE GEORGIA. SHUT DOWN IN 2008. POSSIBLY A MODEL. APPARENTLY THE PRIME MOVERS IN THIS RACKET WERE NEVER CAUGHT. RICO. THE ECONOMY OF USA APPARENTLY WAS TRANSFERRED TO SECRET ACCOUNTS. THE PERVS ARE YET UNTOUCHED. CORRUPTED BANK INSIDERS (LOAN OFFICERS, LOAN GUARANTEE OFFICERS) GOT WEALTHY. (NOT THE BANKS) SO IT WOULD APPEAR. LAWYERS (CO RACKETEERS, ACCESSORIES BEFORE AND DURING AND AFTER THE FACT) ARE THE PROTECTION, CORRUPTING THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, AND THE DA”S OFFICES. SIMPLE RACKETEERING IN THE EXTREME. FORECLOSURE FRAUD IS ACTUALLY A MEANS TO CONCEAL THE MORTGAGE FRAUD.
      POLITICIANS (INCLUDING JUDGES, DA’s) MAY HAVE INADVERTENTLY TAKEN DONATIONS FROM THESE PERVS, THUS BEING SET UP TO HAVE THEIR SILENCE EXTORTED. THIS YOUTUBE VIDEO SEEMS TO MAKE THE RACKET MORE UNDERSTANDABLE. IMHO.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdmBn3Kn2o

    • Bust them! says:

      APPARENTLY: The buyer gets a mortgage via the shadow counterfeit mortgage ‘network’. It allows for the creation of counterfeit mortgages that never appear anywhere, accept that the ‘funds’ obtained are then transferred to a secret account, likely overseas, via the ‘network’.
      It is not clear if payments are ever made on these mortgages, and if they need be made at all.
      These ‘mortgages’ literally only exist in the digital world, and almost never are even findable.
      Once in a while a homeowner might get mail to his house, that states some other person is the home owner, derived from the Homeowners Database. This apparently is because ChoicePoint picked up some digital trace of the loan.
      Apparently ID Theft is often part and parcel of this fraud,.such that the the perpetrator conceals his identity using the ID’s of others ONLY to the extent that he might create fictitious ‘straw men’ from merging data from an ex spouse, or the like, using varying dates of birth, soc sec #’s, names, etc.

      It was said that there was 40 BILLION in bad mortgages back in 2008-9. NOT 14 TRILLION. Logic suggests there are 14 TRILLION (or MORE) in FAKE MORTGAGES.
      Foreclosures allow for the coverup. Or so it would seem. IMHO.

  4. l vent says:

    WE ALL HAVE THE PROOF OF THE PONZI SCHEME. IT IS IN THE ORIGINATION FRAUD AT THE COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE AND ON THE TITLE TO THE HOME, WHICH IS WHERE THEY NEVER PERFECTED A COLLATERAL LIEN AND THAT IS FOLLOWED BY A RELEASE OF MORTGAGE FROM A SECOND BANKSTER TO THE HOMEOWNER. AS A RESULT, OUR HOMES ARE PAID FOR BY US, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT THIS BANK, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PAYMENT OF ALL THE NOTES THEREBY SECURED, AND OF THE SUM OF ONE DOLLAR, THE RECEIPT WHEREOF IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, DOES HEREBY REMISE, RELEASE, CONVEY, AND QUIT CLAIM ONTO THE HOMEOWNER, AND ITS/HIS/HERS/THEIR, HEIRS.LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND ASSIGNS ALL RIGHT, TITLE, INTEREST, CLAIM OR DEMAND WHATSOEVER THROUGH OR BY A CERTAIN MORTGAGE, BEARING THE DATE OF__________, AND RECORDED ON _____________IN THE RECORDER’S OFFICE OF _________, ON THE PREMISES THEREIN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF___________.STATE OF____________TO WIT: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. SIGNED, SEALED AND LEGALLY RECORDED AND NOTARIZED. OUR HOMES ARE PAID FOR FREE AND CLEAR.

    • Michael-Lynn says:

      I vent I have this question-

      Are saying that for all properties for which there is an alleged loan to a borrower that another bank has filed release of mortgage that would signify that the loan is paid in full and does such release via a quit claim, as I do not see this evidence in any county records here in Indiana, except for the payment in full via a release only, if the lender considers that the loan has been paid in full as agreed.

      • l vent says:

        Michael, I left out one key element to this letter it begins, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that _THE NAME OF THE SECOND BANK F/K/A ANOTHER BANK BY SUCCESSOR AND _MERGER_ TO MY ORIGINAL LENDER, They hid this release with a new pin# which I never knew I received. .I think the key to this is SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH THE ORIGINAL LENDER. My County Recorder’s office told me my house is paid for free and clear. I am not saying it is soley because of this letter, they never assigned a lien in 20 years which is way past the 12 year statute of limitations in my state. Why would they have hid this with a new pin. I spoke with a private attorney about this and he told me they do sometimes give new pins but this practice is generally not done 7 years after the ORIGINATION. What do you think they were hiding?

      • l vent says:

        There is also a release of mortgage legally recorded and attached to the mortgage, the doc #’s match.. It is hidden under the old pin#. Sneaky, sneaky.

    • l vent says:

      Michael, the recorders office also told me that I would l need a notarized copy of that letter if I go to court. The FBI told me I could request a copy of the original release letter from any branch of that Bank. I do not think that pay off letter is insignificant. What do you think?

  5. Equity Free says:

    This shows the court how their trying their best to find something of merit . If they could they would .
    It should be dismissed with PREJUDICE !

    STOP THE FRAUDCLOSURES !

  6. housemanrob says:

    Like GREMLINS………………running around……… GIGGLING, at their own destruction!

  7. yvonne says:

    Would like to hear it….

  8. Jason Werner says:

    That’s all? Mine still tops that one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *