The Case of The Disappearing Docket Entry re: Alleged Original Note & Mortgage
Copy your dockets frequently People!
This is a case that had one copy of the …………ahem……….alleged endorsed “original note” filed in a foreclosure lawsuit, and then a completely different endorsed copy of the …………..ahem………….alleged “original note” filed in a subsequent case (after the first case was dismissed). Featured here.
The last several docket entries on the first case looked like this:
| MINUTES – HEARING SEE SCHEDULE MINUTES FOR DETAILS |
1/13/2010 |
| RECOMMENDED ORDER | ON FORECLOSURE MOTION CALENDAR DATED 1/13/10 RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTED | IN MINUTES S/FRIEDMAN 1/13/10 ORIGINAL ORDER IN FORECLOSURE DEPT |
1/13/2010 |
| RECOMMENDED ORDER | GRANTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT |
1/26/2010 |
| CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO MAGISTRATE |
1/26/2010 |
| CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO CLERK |
2/11/2010 |
| RE-NOTICE FOR HEARING 2/23/10 1:30 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT |
2/11/2010 |
| CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO MAGISTRATE |
2/11/2010 |
| FINAL DISPOSITION FORM |
2/11/2010 |
| NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE |
2/11/2010 |
| CA48/REAL PROPERT MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE {PRE 2010} (DISPOSITION) |
2/16/2010 |
| ORDER ON RECOMMENDED ORDER DATED 1/25/10 DISMISSING COMPLAINT |
2/17/2010 |
BUT NOW………what happened to that same case’s docket regarding the original note & mortgage? (docket here)
| 01/13/2010 | MINUTES – HEARING SEE SCHEDULE MINUTES FOR DETAILS |
| 01/13/2010 | RECOMMENDED ORDER ON FORECLOSURE MOTION CALENDAR DATED 1/13/10 RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTED IN MINUTES S/FRIEDMAN 1/13/10 ORIGINAL ORDER IN FORECLOSURE DEPT |
| 01/26/2010 | RECOMMENDED ORDER GRANTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT |
| 01/26/2010 | CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO MAGISTRATE |
| 02/11/2010 | CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO CLERK |
| 02/17/2010 | ORDER ON RECOMMENDED ORDER DATED 1/25/10 DISMISSING COMPLAINT |
| 02/17/2010 | CA48/REAL PROPERTY MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE (PRE 2010) (DISPOSITION) |
| 05/10/2011 | CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO CLERK COMPLETED 5/13/11 |
Did you catch it?
The docket on 02/11/2010 changed from NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE to CORRESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO CLERK.
We have been noticing this trend of dockets being changed. We have access to archived data to prove that this is going on.
Why would this be done? Why is there two different notes. Why oh why?
Violation of the following Florida Statutes? Ongoing research will expose this, and other incidents, further.
|
Title V JUDICIAL BRANCH |
Chapter 28 |
28.211Clerk to keep docket.—The clerk of the circuit court shall keep a progress docket in which he or she shall note the filing of each pleading, motion, or other paper and any step taken by him or her in connection with each action, appeal, or other proceeding before the court. The clerk may keep separate progress dockets for civil and criminal matters. The clerk shall keep an alphabetical index, direct and inverse, for the docket.
History.—s. 1, ch. 71-4; s. 160, ch. 95-147.
|
Title VJUDICIAL BRANCH |
Chapter 28 |
28.13To keep papers.—The clerk of the circuit court shall keep all papers filed in the clerk’s office with the utmost care and security, arranged in appropriate files (endorsing upon each the time when the same was filed), and shall not permit any attorney or other person to take papers once filed out of the office of the clerk without leave of the court, except as is hereinafter provided by law.
History.—s. 59, Nov. 18, 1828; RS 1389; GS 1830; RGS 3075; CGL 4856; s. 1, ch. 89-297; s. 159, ch. 95-147.
~
So the case gets dismissed and then the fraudsters come back and fraudulently “fix” the fraud. DESPICABLE. There should be no do overs. These cases should be dismissed by these judges without prejudice and a clear title goven to the homeowner with no do-overs. If the fraudclosure complaint was not right and legal the first time it will never be right. THERE IS NO WAY TO FIX FRAUD EXCEPT BY USING MORE FRAUD. Fraud anywhere in the contract kills the legal contract.The mortgage fraud is everywhere rampant throughout these fraudulent loans.
Can anyone say “signature scanning”?
This post explains how a person signature scans. Just wondering if this person worked for LPS or DocX…
http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1308614899715+28353475&threadId=1257886
Here is a scarier version…. http://www.teachingbyvideo.com/mortgages/watch-video/3qfeCE3o3f8&feature=youtube_gdata/DinSFLA/signature-scanner-forgetaboutit,-meet-a-unique-robo-signer.html
Here is another tool of the banking industry… http://www.miteksystems.com/pdf/imagenet/ImageNet_Signatures_web.pdf
Some clerks of court need to go to jail. I think an investigation by the AG is in order. There is a prior slip opinion from some years ago, that the Florida AG issued about the requirement for clerks of court to maintain and defend the integrity of the public records. Cort docket sheets are public records too.
I know of at least one case where Plaintiff filed a foreclosure, then found and filed an original note, (not endorsed). Then filed second foreclosure with a lost note count, and voluntary dismissed the first. Then requested the court release the orignal note from the first case, so they could file it in the second. Magically, while moving from the first to the second it was now endorsed.
If clerks of courts are in on this scam, lots of people should go to jail.
This has been going on for a while now…I make several trips often update my docket and have come across missing docs but I also keep good records and now have several binders with copies I make…just have your coins ready to make the copies and I also get a print out each time also of the recorded activities…
Stern was able to at the last min filed an alleged copy of a true note with an endorsement and was unable to produce the original to date saying tht it was returned to the bank/Deutsch/GMAC/ and then the case was dismiss due to non activity from the bank/plaintiff but my attorney and i are keeping good records…esp me…but that recorded alleged original is still out there on the records until what? When? Am thinking I may need to file my own lawsuit against Deutche/Gmac etc. so I can move on…
I have been with others to review their dockets and saw huge amounts of docs removed…
There is an out of control foreign multinational NEW WORLD ORDER REGIME. let’s just call it the FOURTH REICH, that has hijacked America. This is a foreign tyranny that is terrorizing America and the U.S. GOVERNMENT IS ALLOWING THIS . THE BOTTOM LINE IS MASSIVE CORRUPTION. If they are all too corrupt to do their jobs and follow the laws of the land and govern under the U.S. CONSTITUTION and the U.S BILL OF RIGHTS. WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD FORCE ALL OF THEM TO RESIGN.
In Waukesha County, WIsconsin, clerk of court employees are “taught” to alter original summons. If plainitff provides an affidavit of attempted service in small claims they can adjourn return date. The clerk used white out on orginal summons and wrote new return date. Therefore, no orginal exists. When I question this practice I got the hwo dare you question us. FYI – this is the same County that “forgot” to add an entire city’s vote in a recent supreme court election.