Knights of Columbus File Amended Complaint | “It is apparent that the defendant knowingly failed in its obligation to receive, process, maintain, and hold all or part of the mortgage files”

Posted by 4closureFraud on August 17, 2011 · 6 Comments 

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
——————————————————-
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 

Defendant. 

——————————————————-

AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUMMARY

1. This action originally requested the Court to order an immediate accounting of
two trusts known as CWALT 2005-6CB and CWALT 2006-6CB. These trusts hold
residential mortgage loans for the benefit of investors such as Plaintiff. The original
Complaint was not directed at the Defendant Trustee, but information obtained after the
filing of the Complaint demonstrates that the Defendant Trustee has violated its

contractual and other obligations to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks to hold the

Defendant Trustee liable for Plaintiff’s damages in all of the following trusts ….
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Knights of Columbus File Amended Complaint in BNY Mortgage Security Case

By David McLaughlin and Jody Shenn - Aug 16, 2011

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK), targeted by New York for allegedly violating state law while representing mortgage-bond investors, was accused by Knights of Columbus of damaging its investment in mortgage securities.

Knights of Columbus, a charitable organization that invested in mortgage-backed securities, seeks to recover losses and demands punitive damages from the bank, according to an amended complaint filed today in New York state court in Manhattan.

Bank of New York, which serves as trustee for trusts holding loans underlying mortgage securities, mismanaged the trust assets, Knights of Columbus said in a statement today. It accused the bank in the complaint of gross negligence and recklessness and said the bank’s actions caused a “substantial” loss.

“It is apparent that the defendant knowingly failed in its obligation to receive, process, maintain, and hold all or part of the mortgage files,” Knights of Columbus, based in New Haven, Connecticut, said. As a result, it didn’t acquire mortgage-backed securities, “but instead acquired securities backed by nothing at all,” the organization said.

Check out the rest here…

Case files and amended complaint below…

~

4closureFraud.org

~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SEARCH AGAIN   :
Filter:

  
Sort By Doc #  Date   Received   Document   Description Motion #  Filing User  Payment Info
1 20
AMENDED COMPLAINT
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
2 19 2011-08-08
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY
 002 PETER TSAPATSARIS -
3 19-1 2011-08-08
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER
 002 PETER
TSAPATSARIS		 -
4 18 2011-08-01
-
 002 MATTHEW INGBER -
5 17 2011-08-01
-
 - MATTHEW INGBER -
6 16 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW INGBER -
7 15 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW INGBER -
8 15-1 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
9 15-2 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
10 15-3 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
11 15-4 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
12 15-5 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
13 15-6 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
14 15-7 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW
INGBER		 -
15 14 2011-07-20
-
 002 MATTHEW INGBER CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
07/20/2011
16 13 2011-06-24
RE: MOTION NO. 001, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION ENTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK ON JUNE 24, 2011
 001 CLIFFORD REIG -
17 12 2011-06-01
PRO HAC VICE MOTION TALCOTT FRANKLIN
 001 PETER TSAPATSARIS CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011
18 12-1 2011-06-01
PROPOSED ORDER TALCOTT FRANKLIN
 001 PETER
TSAPATSARIS		 CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011
19 12-2 2011-06-01
PETER TSAPATSARIS
 001 PETER
TSAPATSARIS		 CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011
20 12-3 2011-06-01
AFFIDAVIT TALCOTT FRANKLIN
 001 PETER
TSAPATSARIS		 CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011
21 12-4 2011-06-01
PROOF OF SERVICE
 001 PETER
TSAPATSARIS		 CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011
22 11 2011-06-01
PROOF OF SERVICE
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
23 10 2011-06-01
COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
24 9 2011-06-01
RJI
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $95
06/01/2011
25 8
PROOF OF SERVICE
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
26 7
COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
27 6 2011-06-01
RJI
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
28 5
PROOF OF SERVICE
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
29 4
COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
30 3 2011-06-01
RJI
 - PETER TSAPATSARIS -
31 2 2011-06-01
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
 -

~

Case File New York Supr Ct Amended Complaint in Re Knights of Columbus v Bonym

Related posts:

  1. LPS AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT | CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES GENERAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.
  2. POW!!! Barlow Appeared to Hold His Own Against the Legal Team of Bank of America – Utah Foreclosures Remain on Hold Pending Judge’s Decision
  3. DA Files Complaint Against Lawyer of Family Who Broke Back Into their Illegally Foreclosued Home
  4. MTD Granted | Rule 1.110(b) Verification of Mortgage Foreclosure Complaint Must be Included in the Complaint Itself and Not in a Seperate Document
  5. Thousands of Foreclosure Judgments Are VOID (But Courts Will Receive Millions in Additional Funding For This Problem!)

Filed under bankruptcy, cdo, cds, Corruption, Fannie Mae, foreclosure, Foreclosure Fraud, Foreclosuregate, freddie mac, MERS, mortgage electronic registration system, Mortgage Fraud, securities fraud

Comments
6 Responses to “Knights of Columbus File Amended Complaint | “It is apparent that the defendant knowingly failed in its obligation to receive, process, maintain, and hold all or part of the mortgage files””
  1. Bloodsoaked says:
    August 17, 2011 at 11:39 PM

    They are a cherritable organization like the Shriners. They fund raise and give money to alot of cherrities like St. Jude Childerens Hospital and cancer funds and other such organizations. My Grand Dad belonged to The Nights Of Columbus and was always doing cherritable events for them.

    Report this comment

    • lvent says:
      August 17, 2011 at 11:55 PM

      Bloodsoaked, I am not talking about who is doing what the do at face value….I am talking about who is at the top..Like the Cathollc Church and the Masons…I am talking about the hierarchy of the organization….

      Report this comment

      • lvent says:
        August 17, 2011 at 11:58 PM

        BLOODSOAKED, I MEAN WHO ARE THE OWNERS OF THE ORGANIZATION…..THE TOP DOGS, THE HIERARCHY……..?????? That is no doubt a completely different entity than what you see at face value….like everything else is…

        Report this comment

      • lvent says:
        August 18, 2011 at 12:18 AM

        Bloodsoaked, sorry, that I am so cynical and I mean no disrespect to the people on the charitable side of the institution..there is way more to all of this than meets the eye.

        Report this comment

      • lvent says:
        August 18, 2011 at 12:23 AM

        I see this as an attempt to call out guilt and there is plenty of that to go around. That is why I ask who are the owners of the Knights of Columbus….????

        Report this comment

  2. lvent says:
    August 17, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    Boo Hoo..who are the Knights of Columbus???…Someone should look into that…..ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME, THE NEW WORLD HOARDERS.

    Report this comment

'
I support the OCCUPY movement