Judge Meenu Sasser Reversed, Again | 4th DCA Bars Affidavit Over Failure to Verify

LINK – Lawsuit claims that Florida’s largest foreclosure firm faked documents

Aug 3, 2010 I haven’t seen any widespread problem,” Sasser said.
The same Judge Meenu Sasser who’s office was found to have been engaging in improper
www.palmbeachpost.com/…/lawsuit-claims-that-floridas-largest-foreclosure-firm-faked-839393.html

Google Screen Shot

This was from this exact search in Google

“I haven’t seen any widespread”

~

Although the link above is not directly linked to the case below, it goes to show that Sasser didn’t see any “widespread problems” with fraud in foreclosures…

~

4th DCA bars affidavit over failure to verify

The 4th DCA also tossed out a disciplinary action against Ice and his firm, Legal Ice in Royal Palm Beach.

Ice had presented an affidavit from a document review expert that didn’t sit well with Sasser. The expert testified that it was hard to prove if the note presented by the lender at the hearing was the original document, as required by law. Ice asked the judge for more time to make a technical analysis of the note to determine that it wasn’t a “mere” copy of the original document, he said.

“Judges across the state have a tendency to believe that when they see blue ink on a signature, that is the original note” and make a decision based on a document that could be a copy, he said.

Sasser rejected Ice’s argument and entered sanctions against Ice Legal at the request of LaSalle, which called the action a frivolous claim.

The judge ordered Ice Legal to pay the lender’s attorney fees. The 4th DCA reversed the sanctions against the Ice firm.

~

4th DCA bars affidavit over failure to verify

In a ruling favoring two Palm Beach County homeowners, a state appeals court Wednesday disallowed an affidavit submitted to a trial judge in support of a foreclosure case. The court found a loan servicer failed to verify the amount owed on a delinquent mortgage.

Tom Ice, the attorney who represented homeowners Gary and Anita Glarum, said the 4th District Court of Appeal ruling could benefit thousands Florida homeowners facing foreclosure.

Ice said he believes the decision is the first by a Florida appeals court in a case concerning flawed affidavits in foreclosure cases.

Ice had argued that Palm Beach Circuit Judge Meenu Sasser last year erred in granting a judgment to LaSalle Bank based on an affidavit signed by a person who had no personal knowledge of who owned the Glarums’ note and how much the couple owed.

The decision says, ‘We are not going to put up with that, and we are insisting that you have personal knowledge,’??” Ice said. “This court ruled against robo-signing.”

Robo-signing is when bank or loan-servicing employees sign foreclosure affidavits in support of summary judgments without personal knowledge of the cases. That violates state court rules.

When the robo-signing controversy broke a year ago, foreclosures across the country almost came to a halt as lenders sought to sort out their document handling processes.

Robo-signing has played a key role in the ongoing foreclosure crisis.

You can read the rest here…
(Premium Access)

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
7 Responses to “Judge Meenu Sasser Reversed, Again | 4th DCA Bars Affidavit Over Failure to Verify”
  1. G. S. says:

    As an attorney who has appeared before Judge Sasser on a multitude of hearings, you are all out of your mind. Judge Sasser is one of the most knowledgable and well prepared Judges on the bench. She understands the issues and is decisive in her rulings. I have received both favorable and unfavorable ruling from Judge Sasser and, while naturally unhapy unfavorable rulings, I have always felt Judge Sasser provided me with the opportunity to fully advocate my position and consider same. Kudos Judge Sasser!!! You are a credit to the Bench and the residents of Palm Beach County should be proud to have you as a Judge.

  2. Constitutional ChrisYAHan says:

    The purported: JUDGE Sassaer, is NOT: a bona fide Judge; but a mere “Minister-ial Official,” of a Private, Foreign, Owned Incorporation, Posing as a Pagan GOD, sitting in a “Military Tribunal,” to preside over: the Bankruptcy of: Corp U.S., aiding and abetting a “Racketeering Conspiracy,” Contrived by the: “Bankster Cult” memebers of the Global Elitist’s CAHbaals [Assemblies of the Warshiippers of Baal,] Prosecuting a pAHgAHn UnHOLY WAR [jus “fetiales'” See: Blacks Law Lexicon, 7th Ed. Abridged,] against America, to aide in the Fictional: LEGAL SCHEME, to Destroy AMERICA, by: ANY means possible!

    The UnLawful, Legal Monopoly, of Colorable /Changeable Law Merchants, specifically: Twist, Pervert, CONvert, Obstruct, CRAFT, Manipulate, and Fabricate; Hyperbolous Fairy Tails and proclaim them as Law, when this PsychoBaBaal; is NO: SUCH: THING!

    This is a mere “FLEECING of the Flock” as Presumed: Ignorant, WE THE SHEEPLE!

    Most AH-TORN-eys Would NOT Know “true Law,” if it Bit them on the BUT! They to, have Been deceived by the Deciples of SATAN!

  3. housemanrob says:

    Wow…..it took only less than a year and a half……….for Judge Sasser’s cases to start getting the kayak flip………and her husband was Tiger Wood’s divorce lawyer. ARE THEY RUNNIN’ BAD OR WHAT? LIKE LOSERS!

  4. FRAUD FIGHTER says:

    DAVID,

    PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO PROVE IN COURT THAT WHEN A NOTE IS IN A TRUST LIKE MINE IS, IT IS NOT A NOTE ANY LONGER. I TRIED TO SAY JUST WHAT YOU DID AND EVEN — USED FAS140 BUT THE JUDGE DID NOT AGREE.

    IS THERE BETTER EVIDENCE?

    YOU CAN E-MAIL ME AT fightingfraud@live.com I WILL BE HAPPY TO SHARE MY CASE. I ALSO HAVE A FABRICATED NOTE THAT IS BARELY GETTING ANY ATTENTION.

  5. David Robert says:

    – maybe now that her ass has been reversed (again) she will open her eyes, being reversed a second time is not going to look good on her resume so I don’t think she will be so quick to side with the Bank and their Attorney especially when a defendant brings in a handwriting expert to authenticate a Note. There ya go Floridians and anyone else, demand that the Note be authenticated and that strict sanctions and disciplinary action be taken if it is found that the Note is “fake”. If the Note has been Securitized then you can add “Counterfeiting” and Securities fraud to the mix. A Note cannot be on Wall Street pledged as a Certificate and in a court case at the same time. Once the depositor turns the Note into a Certificate (once the butterfly leaves the cocoon it can never return to the cocoon) the Note is forever a Certificate and can never become a Note again.

Leave a Reply