KABOOM | ILLINOIS AG MADIGAN FILES SUIT AGAINST NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING OVER FAULTY MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS FILED WITH COUNTY RECORDERS

MADIGAN FILES SUIT OVER FAULTY MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS FILED WITH COUNTY RECORDERS

Attorney General Alleges Faulty Practices in Foreclosing on
Homeowners in Crisis

Chicago — Attorney General Lisa Madigan today filed a lawsuit against Nationwide Title Clearing for filing faulty documents with Illinois county recorders. Nationwide Title Cleaning Inc. (NTC) is a Florida-based company that prepares documents for mortgage servicers to use against borrowers who are in default, foreclosure or bankruptcy.

“The practices that NTC used were a key contributor to the mortgage crisis by undermining the integrity and accuracy of the mortgage servicing and foreclosure process,” Attorney General Madigan said.

NTC provides a range of mortgage loan services to eight of the top 10 lenders and mortgage servicers in the country. NTC specializes in creating, processing and recording mortgage assignments, which are often used for a lender to foreclose on a borrower.

The lawsuit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court, alleges numerous violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Madigan is asking the court to require NTC to review and correct all documents it unlawfully created and recorded in Illinois, and pay back all revenues, profits and gains achieved in whole or in part due to unlawful practices. The suit also asks the court to impose civil penalties against the company.

Attorney General Madigan is committed to holding all entities that contributed to the financial crisis accountable for their unlawful misconduct. As part of those efforts, Madigan sued the national credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s last week for its fraudulent role in assigning high ratings to risky mortgage-backed investments in the years leading up to the housing market crash. The Attorney General alleged that S&P compromised its independence as a ratings agency by doling out high ratings to unworthy, risky investments as a corporate strategy to increase its revenue and market share.

In December 2011, Madigan and the U.S. Department of Justice reached a $335 million settlement with Countrywide, a subsidiary of Bank of America, for discriminating against thousands of Illinois minority borrowers during the height of the subprime mortgage lending spree. The settlement will provide restitution to harmed Illinois borrowers and is the largest settlement of a fair lending lawsuit ever obtained by a state attorney general. The Attorney General is litigating a similar lawsuit against Wells Fargo alleging widespread discrimination against African American and Latino borrowers.

Madigan led an earlier lawsuit against Countrywide, which resulted in a nationwide $8.7 billion settlement in 2008 over the company’s predatory lending practices. That agreement established the nation’s first mandatory loan modification program. The Attorney General also reached a $39.5 million settlement with Wells Fargo over the bank’s deceptive marketing of extremely risky loans called Pay Option ARMs in 2010.

Assistant Attorneys General Andrew Dougherty, Thomas P. James and Vaishali Rao are handling the case for Madigan’s Consumer Fraud Bureau.

SOURCE: http://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/

Complaint to come as soon ad I get it…

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
47 Responses to “KABOOM | ILLINOIS AG MADIGAN FILES SUIT AGAINST NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING OVER FAULTY MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS FILED WITH COUNTY RECORDERS”
  1. lvent says:

    Hmmmm…funny how a suggestion about natural gas revenues backing a U.S. BANK NOTE…..may be leaving the elite feeling a bit squeamish…they are all such greedy bastards…they want it all! Everything for themselves and nothing for anyone else but debt slavery to the debt of their perps! Abolish them America..WE CAN DO THIS!!…Check out the interesting Feb. 3, 2012 article from rt.com entitled….MYSTERY OF THE MISSING GAS!!!:
    http://rt.com/business/news/europe-gazprom-supply-cut-405/

    Things that make you go hmmmm…%&$^$#@$!!

    • lvent says:

      Maybe the elite are frightened and are hiding the natural gas in their holes.

      • lvent says:

        Obama saying, what the American people really need is jobs. I beg to differ Mr, President, what the American people really need is _RELIEF_ from the FEDERAL RESERVE/WALL STREET/BANK/GSE MASSIVE DERIVATIVES’ DEBT FRAUD IMPOSITION…in fact the American People need relief from the enitire DEBT CARTEL! U.S. BANK NOTES BACKED BY NATURAL RESOURCES…GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC…STOP MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS FROM BOTTLING UP AND STEALING OUR MOST PRECIOUS NATURAL RESOURCE….WATER!!!

      • Katheryn says:

        Maybe someone can throw them a lit match

      • HERE IS A MATCH TO LITE FOR NON JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES:

        SEE: Cases that could save your home; chasechase.org/cases.html
        Khast v. Washington Mutual, JPMorgan Chase, and CRC, Case No. ….. In Herrera, the Substitution of Trustee recited that Deutsche Bank “is the present beneficiary under” the …. Department of Treasury and FDIC Report on WaMu, 4/16/2010 …
        See: Using UDCPA Fair Debt Collection Acts to get Money, Information and Fees
        Posted on January 31, 2012 by Neil Garfield
        Editor’s Comment: One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind. You have both a private right of action against the debt collector and the right to apply to the FTC to set up administrative hearings, where these cases should probably be heard by experienced hearing officers who know what they are looking at.
        The practice of playing the numbers on debt collection has been around for a long time. Whether the debt is real or not, there is a statute of limitations, bankruptcies and other obstacles to collection. A lot of times the debt is now owed at all, but byb pestering customers, the collection agency gets some money out of them, which they keep because they have already bought the portfolio at pennies or less on the dollar.
        This is where servicers and other intermediaries in the fake securitization chain are going to get into hot water. The debt was created when the investor loaned the borrower the money. The intermediaries are by definition debt collectors under the UDCPA and they are, and have been banged for fines many times on individual cases.
        This is an instance where the Obama administration is attacking the practice head-on and taking away their toys. So when the pretender lender comes knocking, it isn’t just a RESPA 6 (Qualified Written Request) that you send out, it is a UDCPA letter you send demanding to know both the identity and contact information for the creditor. As you can see from this article, failure to provide you with that information plus the balance due and how it was computed, is a violation of that Federal Statute.
        It might also be a shortcut way of identifying the pretender not as holder of the note but as agent for an undisclosed principal seeking to collect on a note that was defective in the first place because they did not identify the correct creditor (in violation of TILA) and it did not provide you with a proper accounting showing exactly what this “creditor” received that would reduce your loan balance.
        The MAIN point here is that the servicer might well be the one sending you the notice of delinquency swhen they have performed zero due diligence as to the creditor’s accounting. Where the servicer itself or some other party is keeping the account current, as is often the case, the loan is neither delinquent nor susceptible to being declared in default — but they do it anyway.
        Now that the FTC has declared war on debt collectors who perform illegally, and banged them with this fine, we can invoke the same administrative procedures and grievances with the FTC as to the collection efforts on mortgages where the “collector” is not the creditor and where the money demanded is not actually shown as due.
        There is a presumption that if you didn’t make the payment as set forth in the note, then you must be delinquent and you must be declared (at some point) in default. But that is not true in most cases. There can only be a delinquency or default under the mortgage loan if the borrower has failed to make a payment or cure a payment that is actually due. If the payment has been made already, then no such payment is due, regardless of whether it came from the borrower or not.
        This is why you need to know the four legs of the stool in order to object, sue, defend, and present genuine issues of fact before a trial court that will have no choice but to allow you to proceed to discovery. Discovery is where these cases settle because the pretenders know they didn’t fund the loan, they didn’t pay for the loan and the creditor has been paid in whole or in part, with a lower or zero balance remaining.
        Good info to use for your home also. reas as a whole below! the homeowner has a legal right under color of state and federal law to file an instrument or reconveyance as attorney in fact for the “beneficiary” of record — forcing the “pretender lender” to either back off or prove their case.
        Non Judicial as Private Contract: Opening the Door to Homeowners for Self-Help
        Posted on January 26, 2009 by Neil Garfield
        What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
        After months of wrangling with the obvious due process issues invovled in allowing a Trustee on the Deed of Trust to send a Notice of Default, Notice of Default and to file an eviction (unlawful detainer), it has occurred to me that the reasoning behind “non-judicial” process can be turned on its head in favor of the homeowner.
        The reason why non-judicial foreclosure is NOT a denial of due process is two-fold:
        (1) public policy and judicial economy favors it because until the mortgage meltdown era, nearly all judicial foreclosures had the same pattern, to wit: Suit in Foreclosure with Summons, No Answer by the the borrower, clerk’s default entered, Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment, Judgment entered, Sale date is set, Auction on the courthouse steps and that’s it. It was a rare case in which the borrower had any legitimate defenses and virtually impossible for the foreclosing party to be the wrong party bring the suit. The title record was clear, the bank held the note and mortgage, and but for some relatively minor TILA or RESPA issues it was highly unusual for predatory lending to be a factor in the case, and even if it was, the borrower simply didn’t raise it. Today, none of those assumption are true. Virtually all mortgages between 2001-2008 were between an undisclosed investor or group of investors and the borrower who was funded from proceeds of sales of unregulated securities. Everyone in between was merely an undisclosed conduit or middleman collecting an undisclosed fee as the money from the investor was parsed out for fees, profits, insurance premiums, rebates, kickbacks and of course funding of the alleged loan transaction. None of these middlemen have any loss, claim, or right to foreclose property and all of them have been superceded by the authority of the holders of mortgage backed securities. Even the Trustee on the Deed of Trust has been superceded by at least two other Trustees. They don’t have the note, they don’t have the full record of all the parties who collected fees or paid the principal or interest on the note and mortgage, and they don’t really have any stake in the outcome of the foreclosure — because they didn’t fund the loan or lose any money.
        (2) Under the legal theories that purport to support non-judicial foreclosure, it is said that non judicial foreclosure is a matter of private contract and not state action. Thus, the theory goes, parties are free to contract amongst themselves for authority to sell the property when the loan is reported by some party (alleging to be the beneficiary under the Deed of Trust). So anything the Trustee does that is wrong is really a matter of breach of contract, not violation of due process. If the Trustee on the deed of trust lacks authority, if the beneficiary is out of business and some other party is alleging it is now the new beneficiary, if anyone with or without knowledge alleges that the loan is in default and they are wrong or acting wrongfully, it is a matter of private contract, not subject to the rules of civil procedure governing the conduct of lawsuits in state or Federal Court. It is a contract authorizing “self-help”. Thus I conclude that the homeowner is equally entitles to utilize self-help to preserve his interest in his real property. Of course filing a notice of intent to preserve interest in real property, a notice of non-compliance with statute, or some other instrument that clouds title could force the conversion to a judicial foreclosure where the Trustee and beneficiary would be required to step forward and reveal the true holder in due course, account for the flow of the funds paid thus far, etc. But adding the force of Federal Law (TILA, RESPA and HOEPA), and applicable state laws on deceptive lending practices, and applicable common law to the permission to use self-help gives the homeowner greater power than the entities that seek to use self-help to foreclose. By filing a Qualified Written Request, Federal Law requires an answer and resolution. Barring that resolution, and using the common law doctrine of tacit procuration as a tool of enforcement at the end of the QWR, the homeowner has a legal right under color of state and federal law to file an instrument or reconveyance as attorney in fact for the “beneficiary” of record — forcing the “pretender lender” to either back off or prove their case.
        REMEMBER, YOUR GOAL IS NOT TO ALLEGE THAT YOU DON’T OWE THE MONEY AT ALL. YOUR GOAL IS TO ALLEGE THAT IF YOU DO OWE MONEY IT IS NOT TO THE TRUSTEE OR THE PARTY PRETENDING TO BE THE BENEFICIARY. BASED UPON THE SEC FILINGS THERE IS PROBABLE CA– USE TO BELIEVE THAT YOUR LOAN WAS HANDLED AND TRANSFERRED, SOLD, SLICED AND DICED MANY TIMES. DESPITE THE CURRENT TREND OF COUNTRYWIDE AND OTHERS TO SAY THIS INFORMATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, THERE ARE VERY FEW JUDGES THAT WOULD AFFIRM THAT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO KNOW THE IDENTITY OF YOUR REAL LENDER. YOUR POINT IN GOING TO COURT IS NOT TO SAY THAT YOU AUTOMATICALLY WIN AND THEY LOSE. YOUR POINT IS TO SAY THAT YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON THE MERITS OF THE DEFENSES, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS YOU HAVE AND THAT YOU WANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT OF DISCOVERY ALL UNDER THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

      • Katheryn says:

        Thanks Shelley for the info.

      • THIS SHOULD HELP NON JUDICIAL HOMEOWNERS. Add adverse possesssion a little castle law and breach contract and statutes of limitations on written contracts, including promisory notes and mortgages and this and you have your self a receipt for a house the predators would have a problem getting.
        Non Judicial as Private Contract: Opening the Door to Homeowners for Self-Help
        Posted on January 26, 2009 by Neil Garfield
        What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

        After months of wrangling with the obvious due process issues invovled in allowing a Trustee on the Deed of Trust to send a Notice of Default, Notice of Default and to file an eviction (unlawful detainer), it has occurred to me that the reasoning behind “non-judicial” process can be turned on its head in favor of the homeowner.
        The reason why non-judicial foreclosure is NOT a denial of due process is two-fold:

        (1) public policy and judicial economy favors it because until the mortgage meltdown era, nearly all judicial foreclosures had the same pattern, to wit: Suit in Foreclosure with Summons, No Answer by the the borrower, clerk’s default entered, Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment, Judgment entered, Sale date is set, Auction on the courthouse steps and that’s it. It was a rare case in which the borrower had any legitimate defenses and virtually impossible for the foreclosing party to be the wrong party bring the suit. The title record was clear, the bank held the note and mortgage, and but for some relatively minor TILA or RESPA issues it was highly unusual for predatory lending to be a factor in the case, and even if it was, the borrower simply didn’t raise it. Today, none of those assumption are true. Virtually all mortgages between 2001-2008 were between an undisclosed investor or group of investors and the borrower who was funded from proceeds of sales of unregulated securities. Everyone in between was merely an undisclosed conduit or middleman collecting an undisclosed fee as the money from the investor was parsed out for fees, profits, insurance premiums, rebates, kickbacks and of course funding of the alleged loan transaction. None of these middlemen have any loss, claim, or right to foreclose property and all of them have been superceded by the authority of the holders of mortgage backed securities. Even the Trustee on the Deed of Trust has been superceded by at least two other Trustees. They don’t have the note, they don’t have the full record of all the parties who collected fees or paid the principal or interest on the note and mortgage, and they don’t really have any stake in the outcome of the foreclosure — because they didn’t fund the loan or lose any money.

        (2) Under the legal theories that purport to support non-judicial foreclosure, it is said that non judicial foreclosure is a matter of private contract and not state action. Thus, the theory goes, parties are free to contract amongst themselves for authority to sell the property when the loan is reported by some party (alleging to be the beneficiary under the Deed of Trust). So anything the Trustee does that is wrong is really a matter of breach of contract, not violation of due process. If the Trustee on the deed of trust lacks authority, if the beneficiary is out of business and some other party is alleging it is now the new beneficiary, if anyone with or without knowledge alleges that the loan is in default and they are wrong or acting wrongfully, it is a matter of private contract, not subject to the rules of civil procedure governing the conduct of lawsuits in state or Federal Court. It is a contract authorizing “self-help”. Thus I conclude that the homeowner is equally entitles to utilize self-help to preserve his interest in his real property. Of course filing a notice of intent to preserve interest in real property, a notice of non-compliance with statute, or some other instrument that clouds title could force the conversion to a judicial foreclosure where the Trustee and beneficiary would be required to step forward and reveal the true holder in due course, account for the flow of the funds paid thus far, etc. But adding the force of Federal Law (TILA, RESPA and HOEPA), and applicable state laws on deceptive lending practices, and applicable common law to the permission to use self-help gives the homeowner greater power than the entities that seek to use self-help to foreclose. By filing a Qualified Written Request, Federal Law requires an answer and resolution. Barring that resolution, and using the common law doctrine of tacit procuration as a tool of enforcement at the end of the QWR, the homeowner has a legal right under color of state and federal law to file an instrument or reconveyance as attorney in fact for the “beneficiary” of record — forcing the “pretender lender” to either back off or prove their case.

        REMEMBER, YOUR GOAL IS NOT TO ALLEGE THAT YOU DON’T OWE THE MONEY AT ALL. YOUR GOAL IS TO ALLEGE THAT IF YOU DO OWE MONEY IT IS NOT TO THE TRUSTEE OR THE PARTY PRETENDING TO BE THE BENEFICIARY. BASED UPON THE SEC FILINGS THERE IS PROBABLE CA– USE TO BELIEVE THAT YOUR LOAN WAS HANDLED AND TRANSFERRED, SOLD, SLICED AND DICED MANY TIMES. DESPITE THE CURRENT TREND OF COUNTRYWIDE AND OTHERS TO SAY THIS INFORMATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, THERE ARE VERY FEW JUDGES THAT WOULD AFFIRM THAT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO KNOW THE IDENTITY OF YOUR REAL LENDER. YOUR POINT IN GOING TO COURT IS NOT TO SAY THAT YOU AUTOMATICALLY WIN AND THEY LOSE. YOUR POINT IS TO SAY THAT YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON THE MERITS OF THE DEFENSES, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS YOU HAVE AND THAT YOU WANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT OF DISCOVERY ALL UNDER THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

      • lvent says:

        THE LARGE MULTINATIONAL CORPS ARE AND HAVE BEEN, STEALING AND BOTTLING UP AND MAKING HUGE PROFITS FROM OUR MOST PRECIOUS NATURAL RESOURCE WATER!!!!

      • lvent says:

        ICE MOUNTAIN WATER DOES NOT COME FROM A NATURAL SPRING..UNLESS YOU CONSIDER WATER THAT COMES FROM LAKE MICHIGAN A NATURAL SPRING…ICE MOUNTAIN HAVE BEEN STEALING WATER FROM LAKE MICHIGAN, BOTTLING IT AND SELLING IT AND MAKING HUGE PROFITS FOR YEARS…AND THEY ARE SELLING IT TO THE FOREIGNORS OVERSEAS AS WELL… …..!

      • lvent says:

        THE THEFT OF AMERICAN BY THE RULING ELITE VIA THEIR PERPS MUST BE STOPPED…THEY ARE ALL GETTING FILTHY RICHER FROM OUR DEMISE..! THESE TRAITOR POLITICIANS WHO ARE ALLOWING THIS ROBBERY OF ALL OF AMERICAS WEALTH AND RESOURCES MUST BE REMOVED AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!!!

      • lvent says:

        Right on Katheryn,…with all of the wind coming out of the holes of these politicians…!

      • lvent says:

        Who owns ICE MOUNTAIN WATER? NESTLE..STOCK TICKER SYMBOL…NSRGY…HERE IS THE LINK TO THE FACTS ON WHAT THIS GIANT THIEVING MULTINATIONAL CORP OWNS…AND IT IS ALOT!!
        http://www.wkinvest.com/stock/Nestle_(NSRGY)

      • lvent says:

        HA..the dirty bastards blocked the link!…Just GOOGLE SEARCH THE WORDS: WHO OWNS NESTLE?

      • lvent says:

        I double and triple checked my typing before I posted that link… but looks like a missed a letter.?.. Oh well..here goes!!
        http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Nestle_(NSRGY)

      • lvent says:

        Awesome info Shelley! Please America, stand up for your rights!…Please dont allow them to steal your homes and businesses that they do not own and have no legal right to take!!

      • I am glad you like it . I trully believe if it is so simple for the fruad to steal our houses it should be easier for the owners to find a way to keep our houses. I would file this paperwork in your county records. Make sure it is notorized and wet stamp notorized and attach a copy of the Schneiderman case against the banks on it. And all proof you have come up with to prove fraud. with arrows and make a case of it and file it. Add adverse possession and the castle law and squatters rights which in some states is adverse possession. Rember your state statutes of limitations for breached written contract and promissory note and mortgage and the statutes for the unsecured debt. Add every rock you can. I am not an attorney i am Pro se and I think I could have done this without going to court. So I am a private person without law experience and can not be held responsible for trying to save you.

      • lvent says:

        So true Shelley…! sharing information is the best weapon! We are all trying to process and learn a ton of really valuable info….EDUCATION IS PRICELESS!

  2. Katheryn says:

    Go Anonymous Wreck Havoc

    If I could help you in anyway I would. The mobsters fight dirty and we the ordinary people have no way to compete with that

  3. lvent says:

    RT news reporting hactivist group Anonymous declared today F**K FBI FRIDAY…they are bringing down law enforcement websites such as Homeland Security…maybe law enforcement should get a clue and start cuffing the real criminals instead of WE THE PEOPLE…who are the victims of the biggest ponzi scheme swindle and heist of our wealth in history. And that crime was committed by the crooks on Wall Street, the Banks and the GSE’s…PEOPLE POWER!!!
    http://www.rt.com

    • lvent says:

      LMAO…!!! RT NEWS REPORTING ….SOME OF THE ELITE WANT TO BE PUNISHED AND THEY LIKE PUNISHMENT…LIKE PHYSICAL TORTURE AND BONDAGE!!!

      • lvent says:

        LOL..RT NEWS CALLING THE 2012 ELECTION THE OBAMNEY CAMPAIGN!!! ELIOT SPITZER FOR THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE …ELIOT SPITZER FOR PRESIDENT 2012…!! THE SHERIFF OF WALL STREET…WE NEED A SHERIFF IN THE WHITE HO– USE!! THROW THE TRAITORS OUT!!

      • Katheryn says:

        Put them in Jail. They can be super happy then!

      • That is because they cant feel anything! They have no fe.e.e.l.l.ings! They need pain to feel real! They cause pain and suffering for fun like Phscycos. I am talking about the elite stealing the wealth. They are dead narcist zombies working for the devil. I know there are some very good rich people, whom have good hearts. They are not banksters!

    • Yippee..I …A! Everytime Anonomus does something like this someone is verrrrry embarrassed and heads have swam and expoooooure has happened. Can not wait.

  4. lvent says:

    Millions of jobs wont fix the economy…………$1.2 QUADRILLION IN DERIVATIVES FRAUD COMMITTED BY THE WALL STREET DEBT CARTEL….CAN NEVER BE REPAID ….THESE BANKS ARE HOLDING OUR WEALTH HOSTAGE AND POSTING HUGE PROFITS AND GETTING HUGE BON– USES WHEN THEY OWE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ILL GOTTEN GAINS…..MAKE THE CRIMINALS PAY BACK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!! THROW THE TRAITORS IN PRISON!!!!….THEN….ABOLISH THE FED! WE NEED US BANK NOTES NOW… BACKED BY NATURAL RESOURCE REVENUES!!!!!

    • lvent says:

      RT NEWS REPORTING THE BANKS ARE BUYING UP THEIR OWN BAD DEBT WITH OUR WEALTH…THEIR ILL GOTTEN GAINS…THEY ARE JUST RECYCLING THEIR FRAUD….THAT IS WHAT IS CREATING OUR DECLINING ECONOMY…!

      • lvent says:

        The ongoing recycling of unsustainable debt is the FEDS weapon of financial mass destruction…Obama is aiding and abetting that…with big lies and deceptions like jobs or refis, loan write downs is the FIX….FOR $1.2 quadrillion in derivatives fraud…its not..the problem is….the lies, the deceptions and the FEDERAL RESERVE/ IMF…THE VATICAN GOLD STANDARD OF INDENTURED SERVITUDE WILL NOT FIX THIS…WE NEED US BANK NOTES BACKED BY NATURAL RESOURCE REVENUES!!!

      • It has been my thoughts all along, if the banks can steal the houses besides the profit on the house for a free house , they can give themselves permission to quiet title and clear title and conceal the fraud. As long as the houses are in the hands of the homeowner until the fruad and felony is discovered they banks are liable for the crime and fraud and there will be clouded titles in massive ammounts until they can get the titles cleared up, by giving themselve permission since they are now the new owners of the stolen house. Stealing them is their way to kill two birds with one stone. However now that they have been discovered to have stolen the house, once this catches on and I am sure it will, they are really screwed and will go to jail. Pray Erick Schneideman puts an end to all this hell.

  5. See this and go to mortgage servicing fraud web site and see a written version of on on deadly clear or go to deadly clear web. crime scene.?
    The Rachel Maddow Show: Treating the shattered economy as a crime …
    The Rachel Maddow Show: Treating the shattered economy as a crime scene … captured this adorable video of a … About our ads | Help | Tell us what …

    http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/treating-the-shattered-economy-as... · Cached This has great testimony that the banks dont have the notes. The houses have no debt lein against them they are paid in full and the debt is unsecured debt. They say stay in your home do not leave your home.

  6. lvent says:

    NOW…WHERES THE CUFFS? I HAVE UNCOVERED ENOUGH FRAUD IN MY 2 MORTGAGES TO SEND THESE CROOKS AWAY FOR A VERY LONG TIME! 3 FELONIES = LIFE IN PRISON…!! I DO NOT BY ANY STRETCH, WANT TO DENY AG MADIGAN DESERVES CREDIT FOR THIS. I REALIZE SHE CARES ABOUT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE LAWS THAT WERE PUT IN PLACE TO PROTECT THEM..HOWEVER…NO CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS WOULD BE A CRIME IN ITSELF. THAT WOULD SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE TO THE BANKS. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!!!

    • lvent says:

      STOP THE FRAUDCLOSURES…..! THE MORTGAGES ARE NULL.AND VOID BECA– USE OF HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS IN FRAUD…..! THEIR MASSIVE DEBTS ARE UNSUSTAINABLE!!! THEY MUST ALL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE…….! STOP THESE CROOKS!!! WHERE IS ILLINOIS STATES ATTORNEY ANITA ALVAREZ ??? MORTGAGE FRAUD IS A CRIMINAL MATTER!!!!

  7. Fury says:

    Nationwide National Clearing……..
    hmmm. aren’t they the nasty scientology folks who threatened Lisa E . with a
    Cease & Desist order?

  8. Mary says:

    ReconTrust needs to go down!

    • RECONTRUST just left Washington State lock stock and barrel, because AG Rob McKenna filed Washington State V RECONTRUST with similar complaints AG Beua Biden filed State of Delaware V MERS. MERS nor RECONTRUST nor Deutsche Bank are registered in any state to do business. See the OCC letter dated January 14, 2005 national bank law does not preempt state law ( in the first paragraph) ( get on the web type in just as I typed it here) They are not registered to do business in any state stating they dont have to because they are national banks. MERS is not registered to do business in Delaware where it was incorporated nor is MERS registered as a corporation anywhere in the washington state corporation search . They have been doing unlawful foreclosures for years and as in Rob McKennas comp. alike RECONTRUST, MERS and Deutsche bank should be forever banned from the state of Washington We have a law that will allow this. Rob McKenna needs to ban of of them. There is a bill in the senate in Washington state that needs your support ASAP! LIKE IMMEDIATELY! Bill 6070 is to stop foreclosures in Washington state and demand all titles be recorded in the county registers and sanctions for fraud beneficiaries. Please call adam.kline@leg.wa.gov and steve.hobbs@leg.wa.gov and senator roach pam.roach@leg.wa.gov and or call them . To support this bill it may be your home you save.

      • pam roach number is 360-786-7660 toll free is 1-800-786-7660 Senator Hobbs is 360-786-7686 and senator klines is 360-786-7688 PASS BILL BS 6070 This is very important to washington homeowners and the housing industry. This bill will make it impossible for MERS to do business in Washington and bring transparency to our titles and create income for the county registers. This bill will stop foreclosures.

      • see says:

        I am from WA and I did make those calls yesterday and today. Also a little tidbit of info, MERS was listed as a corp in the state of WA date filed 6-3-09, inactive date 9-25-09 and expiration date of 6-30-10. The agent name was Robert Jacobsen, 93 S Jackson St. Dept 37265, Seattle, WA 98104. Governing Person/All officers Robert Jacabsen, P. O. Box 1386, LaFayette, CA. I spelled the last names as listed on the sheet I copied. They were listed as a Profit, Inactive and the UBI #602929654. In case anyone is interested.

  9. readdocs says:

    Uh….NO ONE is going to jail.

  10. lvent says:

    Bravo…this is an incredible act of Patriotism by AG Lisa Madigan! These are our homes and businesses that these banks have no legal right to sieze because of massive mortgage fraud all committed by mass deception and unfair dealing. I would be honored to assist AG Madigans office in their investigation!

  11. Barbra Orr says:

    Lets hear it for AG Lisa Madigan, she is bold , brave and going where other have been afraid to go. Thank you, Thank You. She is a woman looking out for the people. I think that is maybe why so much does not change please forgive this next statement not enought women in the right places.
    THANK YOU AG LISA MADIGAN AND YOUR ASSISTANTS

  12. lvent says:

    This is a great start and I am happy to see thus however,…so did Chicago Title and Trust RECORD A TON of fraudulent docs and I have proof…….THE ESCROWEE FOR CT&T RECORDED A FORGED…ALTERED MORTGAGE………THE ESCROWEE..ALSO BREACHED HER FIDUCIARY DUTY AND NOTARIZED THE MORTGAGE….YOU CANNOT BE A PARTY TO A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION AND ALSO BE A WTNESS TO IT…THAT IS A CRIMINAL AND PROHIBITED ACT. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING RECORDED 2 ASSIGNMENTS AFTER THE FORECLOSURE LIS PENDS WAS RECORDED….WITH ILLEGAL OUT OF STATE NOTARIZATIONS ..DONE IN FLORIDA…..THE NOTARY IS UNREGISTERED…BUT..FLORIDA IS NOT A BORDERING STATE ANYWAYS..THOSE ARE THEREFORE A NULLITY..IT WAS A FRAUDULENT RECONVEYANCE ANYWAY.

    • lvent says:

      AG Lisa Madigan may want to subpoena Partricia Picard from Chicago Title &Trust..and ask her..under oath..Was she an Illinois Notary…..as well as an Employee of Amcore Bank..and also an employee for Chicago Title and Trust..as she claims on the face of many of my docs…? .She cant legally be all of those.Why was she indemnified at my original house closing by me and the builder for $25,000.00 when the loan was never sold?

Leave a Reply