Bank of America TCPA Class Action Lawsuit

Bank of Opportunity
Bank of America TCPA Class Action Lawsuit

F0r all individuals who were contacted by the company through an automatic dialer or were sent a text messages on their cell phones regarding a Bank of America account other than their own without prior consent between the dates of Feb. 1, 2013 and Apr. 21, 2016, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Bank of America TCPA Class Action Lawsuit. According to the lawsuit, BoA violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by not providing consumers with their phone number nor consented to be contacted by BoA. If the settlement is granted final approval by the court, Class Members will receive between $15 and $25 without doing anything.

Bottom Line:

If you were contacted by the BoA through an automatic dialer or were sent a text message on their cell phones regarding a Bank of America account other than their own without prior express consent between Feb. 1, 2013 and Apr. 21, 2016, then you are eligible for a potential award from the Bank of America TCPA Class Action Lawsuit. According to the lawsuit, BoA violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by not providing consumers with their phone number nor consented to be contacted by BoA. So if you qualify, simply do nothing, class members will automatically receive between $15 and $25!

More here…

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
7 Responses to “Bank of America TCPA Class Action Lawsuit”
  1. lvent says:

    Moreover, it’s equity stripping by FORCED COERCION which is cheating by grand theft larceny of our titles.

  2. lvent says:

    They’re trying to destroy the credibility of _my_ legal work is what I meant.

  3. lvent says:

    The mere mention of discovery into who brought the FC’s results in falsification of evidence that is meant to cause false imprisonment of the PRO SE defendant to destroy evidence of who brought the unlawful stock option trade suits.

    They’re trying to destroy the credibility of the legal work & they can’t because I own it.

  4. lvent says:

    While defending 2 FC’s myself, PRO SE I did genealogy research & I found out my great grandmothers maiden name SALTILY is surname for the MEDICI BANKING DYNASTY.

    Following that, my former FBI AGENT father began treating me like someone’s property which really discredited him to me being I just got done raising my 4 kids & I was trying to save my titles from title theft myself, with no favors from him or no one for that matter.

    It’s the story of treason upon my credibility because some people have none.

  5. lvent says:

    It’s LEGAL BIAS when the judge tries to instruct their views b

  6. lvent says:

    JUDGE ATKINS said to me in FC court, it’s going to be to your peril with no lawyer.

    That certainly was not my choice to not have one because there were none who would fight the fraud.

    Moreover, the judge saying that showed conflict of interest because it.

  7. lvent says:

    IMHO, I should go into the witness protection program for being forced to defend 2 FC’s myself, PRO SE for the past five years because I’ve been wrongfully targeted resulting from it.

    To say it effected my life negatively, hugely understates the fact no one should have to unknowingly go into harms way without knowing it.

    Moreover, they’re not revealing the RPII which the law requires like I said in my RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME is their failure to show proof of loss.

    In their third party claim, they would have to of had the security by the onset, or no later than by the commencement of their suit, & they can’t possibly have it, because I have no knowledge of it.

    That’s not frivolous or legal mumbo jumbo like I was told by JILLIAN COLE from ARONBERG GOLGEHN, DAVIS & GARMISA in open court, that’s cause for dismissal of their entire suit because that’s securities fraud.

    When PLAINTIFF’S don’t reveal themselves to the PRO SE defendant, that’s reckless endangerment upon the PRO SE defendant because the hidden RPII could be unsavory to say the least.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *