<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AFFIRMED &#8211; Motion to Dismiss Granted WITH Prejudice, Defendants&#8217; Attorney&#8217;s Fees Awarded	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: lucinda		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/#comment-18339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucinda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=1286#comment-18339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[we have equi credit aka fairbanks capital,select portfolio servicing they are all the same co.equi credit is assignor.and the bank of new york is assignee our other mortgage assignment  has bank of new york as assignor,there are 4 assignments in the couurt house with 5 names with 7 names singned in ut,fl.. there all messed up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have equi credit aka fairbanks capital,select portfolio servicing they are all the same co.equi credit is assignor.and the bank of new york is assignee our other mortgage assignment  has bank of new york as assignor,there are 4 assignments in the couurt house with 5 names with 7 names singned in ut,fl.. there all messed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mimirayo		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/#comment-386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mimirayo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=1286#comment-386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good for them. Luckily they were able to find an attorney willing to stand up against a bank. They are few and far between, even if the homeowner has done all the leg work and has substantial proof.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for them. Luckily they were able to find an attorney willing to stand up against a bank. They are few and far between, even if the homeowner has done all the leg work and has substantial proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: floridadefenseteam		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/#comment-278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[floridadefenseteam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=1286#comment-278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So the bank couldn&#039;t produce the original note and the case was dismissed involuntarily. The kicker is the Judge awarded the defendant 2.5 X the attorney fees which was appealed by the bank (and they lost the appeal).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the bank couldn&#8217;t produce the original note and the case was dismissed involuntarily. The kicker is the Judge awarded the defendant 2.5 X the attorney fees which was appealed by the bank (and they lost the appeal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lisa E		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/01/20/affirmed-motion-to-dismiss-granted-with-prejudice-defendants-attorneys-fees-awarded/#comment-277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=1286#comment-277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait!  This was from April 2008?  Why are we just learning of it now?

Am I missing some vital piece of info?

Lisa E]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait!  This was from April 2008?  Why are we just learning of it now?</p>
<p>Am I missing some vital piece of info?</p>
<p>Lisa E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
