Comments on: Fannie Mae Update – MERS must NOT be Named as a Plaintiff in ANY Foreclosure Action Ever Again https://4closurefraud.org/2010/03/31/fannie-mae-update-mers-must-not-be-named-as-a-plaintiff-in-any-foreclosure-action-ever-again/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:11:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Maia https://4closurefraud.org/2010/03/31/fannie-mae-update-mers-must-not-be-named-as-a-plaintiff-in-any-foreclosure-action-ever-again/#comment-1052 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:35:44 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=2689#comment-1052 What about MERS to a trustee (that’s what I see)?–any thoughts–how can MERS assign anything it doesn’t own, even back to the servicer?–just gets more confusing, but certsinly brings up questions to bring to court. Good work for finding this in!

]]> By: PJ https://4closurefraud.org/2010/03/31/fannie-mae-update-mers-must-not-be-named-as-a-plaintiff-in-any-foreclosure-action-ever-again/#comment-1024 Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:46:31 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=2689#comment-1024 This should prove very interesting..when it all comes out what this really means, since Fannie is one of many fraudsters that founded MERS. One can not really trust anything they do. Also it will be interesting to see how GSE servicer,s like PHH Mortgage and GSE approved foreclosure mill’s like Shapiro Network are effected by this.

]]>