Comments on: Why The Rally in Tally? The Foreclosure Mills and MERS Represent A Fundamental Breakdown in Law And Institutions

By: Consumer Freedom Fighter!

Consumer Freedom Fighter! — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:25:09 +0000

In reply to MERSCORP.

MERSCORP you are GRAVELY MISTAKEN!

This excerpt comes directly from one of the Law Firms (Cleveland, OH) that specifically counsels the groups of investors that are involved with MERS and I quote:

“Moreover, while the MERS rule allows us to allege in the foreclosure documents that MERS is the noteholder, we are prohibited from stating that MERS is the note-owner.”

And IF YOU DO – YOU WILL BE Sanctioned:

“Sanctions – The Rule authorizes MERS to impose sanctions of $1,000 for the first violation and $5,000 for each subsequent violation of the prohibitions against: • Stating that MERS is the noteowner”

As you can see, MERS can allege (of course this means it has not been PROVEN) they are the ‘noteholder’ but MERS will NEVER be the NOTE-OWNER and NEVER have the RIGHT TO ENFORCE!

It’s obvious you do not know what you are talking about – nor are you in anyway affiliated with MERS or clearly you would know and understand the information stated above, and not make such foolish comments.

~ Don’t Tread on ME ~ JW – ICA – CFF

By: MERSCORP

MERSCORP — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:34:39 +0000

In the foreclosure process, MERSCORP Inc. (MERS) has been and continues to be an outspoken advocate for all parties, producing all the required evidence, including the note. If that means taking more time to gather the necessary documents before rushing in and filing a pleading, MERS strongly recommends doing so.

It often takes time to produce the note. Attorneys for mortgage companies usually are under very tight time pressures from investors to act quickly. Instead of actually producing the note, many attorneys rely on the practice of filing a “lost note” affidavit. This is a practice that MERS does not support. When MERS forecloses, we require that the promissory note be in our possession endorsed in blank, making MERS the note-holder with the right to enforce it.

By: We R Blessings

We R Blessings — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:54:08 +0000

Congratulations! Great job to Counsel for the defendants! There is another case that was documented in the Courts, (Public Record) of where, the Attorney from Law Offices of David J. Stern, attempted to Shout Hearsay for Summary Judgement, & that Judge stated he had a problem with that from that Attorney from Mr. Stern’s law firm! Another married couple, must have felt protected by their lawyer against the Clutches of Evil, coming at them…
It is amazing, for our group to read documents from Public Records & discover that Law Offices of David J. Stern, are attempting to abscond a couple’s home & property through measures that are NOT acceptable to the Courts! Plus, Mr. Stern’s law firm, has been reported to “Allegedly” CONTROL, other Foreclosure Mills, (previously documented on other sites) such as: Living Lies, & Ripoffreport.com (Report #541158 & others), too many problems from his law firm to mention…
We pray for all Victims!!! God Bless, Defense Counsel & God Bless, Florida Attorney, Mr. Thomas Ice of Ice Legal (One of the Best Attorneys, in the Country = Our Valuable opinion)!