<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Thousands of Foreclosure Judgments Are VOID (But Courts Will Receive Millions in Additional Funding For This Problem!)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/06/thousands-of-foreclosure-judgments-are-void-but-courts-will-receive-millions-in-additional-funding-for-this-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/06/thousands-of-foreclosure-judgments-are-void-but-courts-will-receive-millions-in-additional-funding-for-this-problem/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Long		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/06/thousands-of-foreclosure-judgments-are-void-but-courts-will-receive-millions-in-additional-funding-for-this-problem/#comment-4499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4214#comment-4499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Judge dismissed the case with prejudice (attorney didn&#039;t show or notify tenant), party lost the house and now lives in apartment. Any known remedy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judge dismissed the case with prejudice (attorney didn&#8217;t show or notify tenant), party lost the house and now lives in apartment. Any known remedy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard F. Kessler		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/06/thousands-of-foreclosure-judgments-are-void-but-courts-will-receive-millions-in-additional-funding-for-this-problem/#comment-1782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard F. Kessler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 04:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4214#comment-1782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First of all, in the instant case the court did not dismiss the case but only dismissed the case as to unknown tenants. This may be a bad practice but it does not affect the rights of the debtor which is all that need concern the court. There is no citation here of a case where a case was dismissed  and plaintiff thereafter wrongfully actually got a judge to sign a summary judgment of foreclosure on the mortgaged property.

The problem addressed by Mr. Weidner stems from the fact that a plaintiff is a not required to file a title report together with its pleadings to show that all parties that have an interest have been served. This does result in the potential cloud on title down the road if parties in interest were not served. It will necessitate a subsequent action to quiet title- all an avoidable mess based upon bad judicial policy. However none of this will help a debtor defendant in foreclosure because none of this affects the debtor&#039;s interest in the property. The debtor has no legal interest in protecting the interests of others such holders of mechanics liens and junior encumbrances.

No one has yet come up with the way to hold foreclosure mills and lenders accountable for damages to debtors for predatory foreclosure, misuse of process and fraud and deceit. However, I have some ideas which I will share with you in the coming weeks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, in the instant case the court did not dismiss the case but only dismissed the case as to unknown tenants. This may be a bad practice but it does not affect the rights of the debtor which is all that need concern the court. There is no citation here of a case where a case was dismissed  and plaintiff thereafter wrongfully actually got a judge to sign a summary judgment of foreclosure on the mortgaged property.</p>
<p>The problem addressed by Mr. Weidner stems from the fact that a plaintiff is a not required to file a title report together with its pleadings to show that all parties that have an interest have been served. This does result in the potential cloud on title down the road if parties in interest were not served. It will necessitate a subsequent action to quiet title- all an avoidable mess based upon bad judicial policy. However none of this will help a debtor defendant in foreclosure because none of this affects the debtor&#8217;s interest in the property. The debtor has no legal interest in protecting the interests of others such holders of mechanics liens and junior encumbrances.</p>
<p>No one has yet come up with the way to hold foreclosure mills and lenders accountable for damages to debtors for predatory foreclosure, misuse of process and fraud and deceit. However, I have some ideas which I will share with you in the coming weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: casey		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/06/thousands-of-foreclosure-judgments-are-void-but-courts-will-receive-millions-in-additional-funding-for-this-problem/#comment-1781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[casey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4214#comment-1781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there a California Based attorney who is willing to fight the Banks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a California Based attorney who is willing to fight the Banks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
