<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Response to the Florida Supreme Court RE: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Motion for Rehearing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 17:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: h.allan		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-533958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[h.allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-533958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[,MICHAEL 
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS ON  Florida Supreme Court RE: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Motion for Rehearing” PART 1 AND 2 AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME. 
ESPECIALLY THE COMMENTS OF THE EXECUTIVE VP OF FREDDIE MAC BOOM AND PART 2
 Lavalle’s and Lisa Epstein’s (Foreclosure Hamlet) COMMENTS &#038; RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO SHAPIRO FISHMAN, LLP’s MOTION FOR RE-HEARING OR CLARIFICATION regarding verification of foreclosure complaints. IT AMAZES ME HOW SHAPIRO,FISHMAN  OPENLY DENIES THE SUPREME COURT RULING ,THERE IS NO RE-TRIAL IT IS DONE AND DONE EVEN THOUGH THEY STILL DEFI THE SUPREME COURTS RULING AND SO DOES THE COURTS AND THE JUDGES BY CLOSING FORECLOSURE CASES WITHOUT REGARD FOR FRAUD OR HOW IT AFFECTS THE HOMEOWNER, WE HAVE LESS RIGHTS THAN CRIMINALS IN THESE COURTS AND THAT HAS TO CHANGE!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,MICHAEL<br />
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS ON  Florida Supreme Court RE: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Motion for Rehearing” PART 1 AND 2 AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME.<br />
ESPECIALLY THE COMMENTS OF THE EXECUTIVE VP OF FREDDIE MAC BOOM AND PART 2<br />
 Lavalle’s and Lisa Epstein’s (Foreclosure Hamlet) COMMENTS &amp; RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO SHAPIRO FISHMAN, LLP’s MOTION FOR RE-HEARING OR CLARIFICATION regarding verification of foreclosure complaints. IT AMAZES ME HOW SHAPIRO,FISHMAN  OPENLY DENIES THE SUPREME COURT RULING ,THERE IS NO RE-TRIAL IT IS DONE AND DONE EVEN THOUGH THEY STILL DEFI THE SUPREME COURTS RULING AND SO DOES THE COURTS AND THE JUDGES BY CLOSING FORECLOSURE CASES WITHOUT REGARD FOR FRAUD OR HOW IT AFFECTS THE HOMEOWNER, WE HAVE LESS RIGHTS THAN CRIMINALS IN THESE COURTS AND THAT HAS TO CHANGE!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: h.allan		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-533957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[h.allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-533957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BANKS DECEIT UNCOVERED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROSPECTUS 
PROVES (GAAP) WAS NOT FOLLOWED AND LENDERS AVOIDED PAYING TAX ON NOTES
      
Due to IRS CODE 860 governing Tax Pass Through for special purpose Vehicles , (the real parties of interest are the shareholders)is in the Supplemental Prospectus as mortgage pass through certificates issued by the S.E.C.
Proves Generally Accepted Accounting Principles were not enforced and therefore the property was foreclosed on through extortion ,theft and fraud. 
All federal Felonies punishable with prison time.

1-THE BANK CHOSE THE DISTRIBUTED PARTY OF INTEREST SCHEME TO AVOID PAYING TAXES TWICE
GIVING UP THEIR RIGHT TO  FORECLOSE SINCE THEY CANNOT PROVE DOUBLE ENTRY ACCOUNTING (GAAP)


    
 HERES HOW  TO ACCESS YOUR  TRUST IN THE S.E.C. 
 the Supplemental Prospectus of Lehman XS TRUST SERIES 2006-GP4 reports as a pass through GO TO:(-- USE YOUR TRUST)

1-The way to access this is go to www.sec.gov

2- in the right side of the page under LATEST NEWS click on SEARCH EDGAR

3-TYPE IN LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES 2006-GP4 UNDER COMPANY NAME.

4- CLICK ON DOCUMENTS 
ON 424B5- –PROSPECTUS (RULE 424(b)(5)-2006-07-31-333-129480-24 

5- CLICK ON P414214_424B5.txt

6- here is the page that comes up  showing mortgage pass through certificate ,series 2006-gp4


LEHMAN XS TRUST
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH  CERTIFICATES
SERIES 2006~GP4
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.
SPONSORAND SELLER
STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION
DEPOSITOR
LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES 2006-GP4
ISSUING ENTITY
[AURORA LOG0]
AURORA LOAN SERVICESLLC
MASTER SERVICER
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
JULY 28, 2006
LEHMAN BROTHERS]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BANKS DECEIT UNCOVERED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROSPECTUS<br />
PROVES (GAAP) WAS NOT FOLLOWED AND LENDERS AVOIDED PAYING TAX ON NOTES</p>
<p>Due to IRS CODE 860 governing Tax Pass Through for special purpose Vehicles , (the real parties of interest are the shareholders)is in the Supplemental Prospectus as mortgage pass through certificates issued by the S.E.C.<br />
Proves Generally Accepted Accounting Principles were not enforced and therefore the property was foreclosed on through extortion ,theft and fraud.<br />
All federal Felonies punishable with prison time.</p>
<p>1-THE BANK CHOSE THE DISTRIBUTED PARTY OF INTEREST SCHEME TO AVOID PAYING TAXES TWICE<br />
GIVING UP THEIR RIGHT TO  FORECLOSE SINCE THEY CANNOT PROVE DOUBLE ENTRY ACCOUNTING (GAAP)</p>
<p> HERES HOW  TO ACCESS YOUR  TRUST IN THE S.E.C.<br />
 the Supplemental Prospectus of Lehman XS TRUST SERIES 2006-GP4 reports as a pass through GO TO:(&#8211; USE YOUR TRUST)</p>
<p>1-The way to access this is go to <a href="http://www.sec.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.sec.gov</a></p>
<p>2- in the right side of the page under LATEST NEWS click on SEARCH EDGAR</p>
<p>3-TYPE IN LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES 2006-GP4 UNDER COMPANY NAME.</p>
<p>4- CLICK ON DOCUMENTS<br />
ON 424B5- –PROSPECTUS (RULE 424(b)(5)-2006-07-31-333-129480-24 </p>
<p>5- CLICK ON P414214_424B5.txt</p>
<p>6- here is the page that comes up  showing mortgage pass through certificate ,series 2006-gp4</p>
<p>LEHMAN XS TRUST<br />
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH  CERTIFICATES<br />
SERIES 2006~GP4<br />
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.<br />
SPONSORAND SELLER<br />
STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION<br />
DEPOSITOR<br />
LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES 2006-GP4<br />
ISSUING ENTITY<br />
[AURORA LOG0]<br />
AURORA LOAN SERVICESLLC<br />
MASTER SERVICER<br />
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT<br />
JULY 28, 2006<br />
LEHMAN BROTHERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Larry Bradshaw		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-4349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Bradshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-4349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the opportunity to read and investigate others who have gone to battle with regards to mortgage foreclosures. I too, as a pro-se have been in a battle now for nearly 4 years all the while maintaining possession of my home. I have had my complaint dismissed twice now, yet FDLG have filed for the third time. The fraud is being committed yet again just by way of a different Plaintiff. It appears to me as if FDLG is just expecting the courts to grant a summary judgment in their favor regardless of what the law says. I have more evidence of fraud than one can shake a stick at proving the fraud as well as civil rules violations, and even though I have made several agreements requesting the courts to follow the civil rules of procedures, and the law for that matter. I continue to be ignored. It appears to me as if the judges refuse to conform to the law and rules of court when it comes to a pro-se litigate representing him/herself. Here are my two case numbers if you are interested for your review. 07-ca-11562 and 08-ca-055974 - There are more than 250 pages of information with in these two cases. I have done the research and been to through 6 different judges and some 27 attorneys and not one of them has followed the rules of court or the law, however I remain in my home. I would not classify this as justice, but total proof that corruption in our judicial system does nothing more than wastes everyone&#039;s time and money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the opportunity to read and investigate others who have gone to battle with regards to mortgage foreclosures. I too, as a pro-se have been in a battle now for nearly 4 years all the while maintaining possession of my home. I have had my complaint dismissed twice now, yet FDLG have filed for the third time. The fraud is being committed yet again just by way of a different Plaintiff. It appears to me as if FDLG is just expecting the courts to grant a summary judgment in their favor regardless of what the law says. I have more evidence of fraud than one can shake a stick at proving the fraud as well as civil rules violations, and even though I have made several agreements requesting the courts to follow the civil rules of procedures, and the law for that matter. I continue to be ignored. It appears to me as if the judges refuse to conform to the law and rules of court when it comes to a pro-se litigate representing him/herself. Here are my two case numbers if you are interested for your review. 07-ca-11562 and 08-ca-055974 &#8211; There are more than 250 pages of information with in these two cases. I have done the research and been to through 6 different judges and some 27 attorneys and not one of them has followed the rules of court or the law, however I remain in my home. I would not classify this as justice, but total proof that corruption in our judicial system does nothing more than wastes everyone&#8217;s time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-3918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-3918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-1909&quot;&gt;Nye Lavalle&lt;/a&gt;.

Shapiro is part of the team suing us for foreclosure via Citi. Citi hired co-counsel Akerman and Senterfitt 60 days after Shapiro submitted the Re-hearing affidavit to the court. I guess they did not like the comments. Now they are under an AG investigation HA!. Citi never filed an assignment with the court in my case. Their name is not on one document in my case. I&#039;ve submitted over 13 affidavits and they have emphatically refused to answer any per the law. I have a Negative Averment Hearing 8/26/10. Summary jugement hearing has been cancelled 3 x. They asked for more time to produce the origianl wet ink document back in March. No document yet..... I beleive the fraud is getting ready to explode not just in this investigation but will set a precedent in all states]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-1909">Nye Lavalle</a>.</p>
<p>Shapiro is part of the team suing us for foreclosure via Citi. Citi hired co-counsel Akerman and Senterfitt 60 days after Shapiro submitted the Re-hearing affidavit to the court. I guess they did not like the comments. Now they are under an AG investigation HA!. Citi never filed an assignment with the court in my case. Their name is not on one document in my case. I&#8217;ve submitted over 13 affidavits and they have emphatically refused to answer any per the law. I have a Negative Averment Hearing 8/26/10. Summary jugement hearing has been cancelled 3 x. They asked for more time to produce the origianl wet ink document back in March. No document yet&#8230;.. I beleive the fraud is getting ready to explode not just in this investigation but will set a precedent in all states</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ForeclosureHamlet		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-2360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ForeclosureHamlet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-2360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Michael!

A featured post on 4closureFraud reaches so many people, educating Americans across the land, across the spectrum of this crisis. 

That&#039;s our common goal.  

Thank you again!
Lisa
ForeclosureHamlet.org]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Michael!</p>
<p>A featured post on 4closureFraud reaches so many people, educating Americans across the land, across the spectrum of this crisis. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s our common goal.  </p>
<p>Thank you again!<br />
Lisa<br />
ForeclosureHamlet.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nye Lavalle		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/#comment-1909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nye Lavalle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=4615#comment-1909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for the kind words Michael!  I&#039;m proud to have new and great advocates and activists such as you, Lias, Tom, Matt, Chip et al join those of us who have been championing the cause of real freedom and justice for over a decade now.  While the court did not accept our brief due to technicalities, I do believe they and many others have read it and learned.  You&#039;re doing great work in your digging efforts and I just returned from a trip to Atlanta and Hilton Head where I met with a group of prominent lawyers who are going to join us in this fight and make it right by all!  Thanks again and wait till you see what I have cooking in FLA and GA in suing some judges, lawyers and the Republican Whip of the state Senate in GA!  Will keep you posted!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the kind words Michael!  I&#8217;m proud to have new and great advocates and activists such as you, Lias, Tom, Matt, Chip et al join those of us who have been championing the cause of real freedom and justice for over a decade now.  While the court did not accept our brief due to technicalities, I do believe they and many others have read it and learned.  You&#8217;re doing great work in your digging efforts and I just returned from a trip to Atlanta and Hilton Head where I met with a group of prominent lawyers who are going to join us in this fight and make it right by all!  Thanks again and wait till you see what I have cooking in FLA and GA in suing some judges, lawyers and the Republican Whip of the state Senate in GA!  Will keep you posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
