Comments on: Florida 5th DCA – More Heat for Rubber Stamping Judge for Denying Motions to Cancel Foreclosure Sales Over and Over and Over and Over https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:33:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: dave https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-3425 Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:17:25 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-3425 In reply to BuddyT.

can you provide a copy of the letter from BOA, i am in the same position except i am before a bankruptcy juudge, also you may want to look at the pooling and servicing agreement, normally it says, the trustee must be a bank doing business in the usa, lasalle doesn’t do any business in the usa.

]]> By: BuddyT https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2298 Fri, 28 May 2010 14:53:41 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2298 Here is the biggest issue in this case… LaSalle Banks charter was canceled on October 17th 2008. How can a defunct bank be plaintiff?? How can they file Complaints or answers… They DONT EXIST!

I have the same LaSalle as trustee for a WAMU Pass thru…. in My case of which I am challenging and taking my case to appeals. These Law-firms purportedly representing LaSalle are committing fraud and perjury!

I have verified the non existence of LaSalle and the lower court would not hear it.
Even Bank of America has sent me a letter (they absorbed LaSalle when the charter collapsed) stating that they (LaSalle) are no longer doing business under that name and it is now under the B of A. Interesting isn’t it.

This is yet another reason for all of us to be diligent! These supposed Officers of the Court are nothing more than con artists and are willingly commiting Civil Fraud, Conversion and Perjury! Yet the Lower courts are not hearing it!
Wish me Luck as I am formulating my Appeals Brief now, (any on want to assist?)
Keep up the good fight everyone, the TRUTH has to win out, doesn’t it?

]]> By: stopGOVTwaste https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2274 Thu, 27 May 2010 06:00:14 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2274 In reply to ForeclosureHamlet.

would seem to me that someone is cherry picking em’ for their investment club? there are plenty of people working in govt. and who wouldn’t want to “steal” a home for a mere 8k… makes perfectly logical sense to me!

]]> By: lisamarie https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2265 Thu, 27 May 2010 00:52:15 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2265 Vote is ass out!

]]> By: ForeclosureHamlet https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2253 Wed, 26 May 2010 18:13:12 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2253 In reply to Bill 20 Year Mortgage pro.

Bill,

You are 100% right! Um, DUH! “Your Honor, that summary judgment should never have been granted in the first place! We were not in compliance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure so PLEASE don’t let us get away with this foreclosure and reverse this sale IMMEDIATELY!”

Butler & Hosch? Goes without saying!

See here where a S.C. Federal Judge finds some “issues” of material fact with B&H’s pleadings: http://tinyurl.com/y9eohv7

]]> By: Michael https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2249 Wed, 26 May 2010 17:28:13 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2249 Sounds like more than enough to merit a referral to the JQC. Let the judge rocket docket her/himself right off the bench. If they’re not willing to do their job — adjudicating cases, and not just rubber stamping them — there are plenty of qualified attorneys that would be happy to take their place.

]]> By: ForeclosureHamlet https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2248 Wed, 26 May 2010 17:20:47 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2248 So, for once the rocket docket, blindfold rubber-stamping judge works AGAINST the bank who “accidentally” lost out to a third party purchaser of the property. Here’s the bank’s attorneys, scrambling to get that sale reversed and the judge is just stamp-stamp-stamp (denied-denied-denied).

Damn frustrating to be on the other side of a disinterested judge.

I seriously wonder if that judge, too lethargic to review the actual pleading was so biased that he assumed those three emergency motions to cancel the sale were filed by yet another “scamming deadbeat borrowers”.

Also, I have a feeling that the bank’s ultimate goal was to have the sale reversed, push the borrowers into a second default by “misapplying their HAMP payments”, foreclosure again with the borrower having newly waived all his rights by signing the modification packet, and then foreclose again for a more reasonable sale price.

Homeowners still end up homeless if I’m guessing correctly.

]]> By: Bill 20 Year Mortgage pro https://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/26/florida-5th-dca-more-heat-for-rubber-stamping-judge-for-denying-motions-to-cancel-foreclosure-sales-over-and-over-and-over-and-over/#comment-2251 Wed, 26 May 2010 16:52:28 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=5321#comment-2251 In reply to ForeclosureHamlet.

Whats amazing that no one touched on is that the lenders motion claimed there own pleadings were insufficient to grant a summary judgment. THis is a great defense for everyone else. The summary judgment mut be posted so every person fighing this ank can provided the motion to set a side and identical motion for summary judgment, let the bank fight against there own estoppel.

]]>