<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BAM! 3rd DCA Reverses Final Judgement RE Shapiro &#038; Fishman HSBC &#8211; Trial Court Abused its Discretion	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/06/10/bam-3rd-dca-reverses-final-judgement-re-shapiro-fishman-hsbc-trial-court-abused-its-discretion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/06/10/bam-3rd-dca-reverses-final-judgement-re-shapiro-fishman-hsbc-trial-court-abused-its-discretion/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ForeclosureHamlet		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/06/10/bam-3rd-dca-reverses-final-judgement-re-shapiro-fishman-hsbc-trial-court-abused-its-discretion/#comment-2598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ForeclosureHamlet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=6163#comment-2598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is this one of those &quot;double-deadbeats&quot;?   Sounds SO familiar!  

Let me guess............this family tried unsuccessfully to work out a loan modification and ended up being served foreclosure papers by a bank who was not part of the loan modification negotiations.  Then, while trying to sort all that out, the first bank is informed of the foreclosure action by a different bank and instead of assisting in clearing up the confusion, they stampede in with a new foreclosure lawsuit to &quot;protect their claim on the collateral&quot;.

Now, to all you who buy the &quot;deadbeat&quot; or &quot;bought more house than they could afford&quot; propaganda, who would you pay in such a scenario?  Both?  One?  Neither?  Pay one and allow the other to foreclose and evict you from the home for which you are paying?  Attempt to modify one?  Attempt to modify both?

I&#039;m sure these bank and mortgage servicers are more than accommodating when their customers call with this confusing and frightening situation.

ForeclosureHamlet.org]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this one of those &#8220;double-deadbeats&#8221;?   Sounds SO familiar!  </p>
<p>Let me guess&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;this family tried unsuccessfully to work out a loan modification and ended up being served foreclosure papers by a bank who was not part of the loan modification negotiations.  Then, while trying to sort all that out, the first bank is informed of the foreclosure action by a different bank and instead of assisting in clearing up the confusion, they stampede in with a new foreclosure lawsuit to &#8220;protect their claim on the collateral&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now, to all you who buy the &#8220;deadbeat&#8221; or &#8220;bought more house than they could afford&#8221; propaganda, who would you pay in such a scenario?  Both?  One?  Neither?  Pay one and allow the other to foreclose and evict you from the home for which you are paying?  Attempt to modify one?  Attempt to modify both?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure these bank and mortgage servicers are more than accommodating when their customers call with this confusing and frightening situation.</p>
<p>ForeclosureHamlet.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
