<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Oregon Sues Countrywide Over Pension Fund Losses Associated with Risky Mortgage-Backed Securities	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/15/oregon-sues-countrywide-over-pension-fund-losses-associated-with-risky-mortgage-backed-securities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/15/oregon-sues-countrywide-over-pension-fund-losses-associated-with-risky-mortgage-backed-securities/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ali		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/15/oregon-sues-countrywide-over-pension-fund-losses-associated-with-risky-mortgage-backed-securities/#comment-344245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=7526#comment-344245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it really interesting that anyone would invest anyones  pensions in a risky market. That why investors have to read the really, realy small print, it say &quot;its really realy risky and you can&#039;t hold the seller of &quot;risky&quot; bet responsible if anything goes wrong. I used to work at the CME and Board of trade in Chicago and thats how it works, if you lose, well then, you lose. Thats why all investments on Wall Street are RISKY. You don&#039;t go to the casino and lose all your money and go to the management and ask for your money back. You don&#039;t buy a losing lottery ticket and ask for your money back, hell it&#039;s not even tax deductable!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it really interesting that anyone would invest anyones  pensions in a risky market. That why investors have to read the really, realy small print, it say &#8220;its really realy risky and you can&#8217;t hold the seller of &#8220;risky&#8221; bet responsible if anything goes wrong. I used to work at the CME and Board of trade in Chicago and thats how it works, if you lose, well then, you lose. Thats why all investments on Wall Street are RISKY. You don&#8217;t go to the casino and lose all your money and go to the management and ask for your money back. You don&#8217;t buy a losing lottery ticket and ask for your money back, hell it&#8217;s not even tax deductable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/15/oregon-sues-countrywide-over-pension-fund-losses-associated-with-risky-mortgage-backed-securities/#comment-3254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=7526#comment-3254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting; they mention families but their &quot;stand&quot; doesn&#039;t seem to have broad state-based foreclosure legislation to slow down their train wreck.  It seems to be focused on the public employee pension funds, and the verbiage almost looks like they&#039;re using homeowners to garner sympathy while doing nothing at all to shield homeowners form the practices outlined.  If I didn&#039;t know better I may even think it sounds hypocritical.  I&#039;m sure that government employees wouldn&#039;t throw homeowners under the bus or use them as pawns to increase the holdings of their own pension funds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting; they mention families but their &#8220;stand&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem to have broad state-based foreclosure legislation to slow down their train wreck.  It seems to be focused on the public employee pension funds, and the verbiage almost looks like they&#8217;re using homeowners to garner sympathy while doing nothing at all to shield homeowners form the practices outlined.  If I didn&#8217;t know better I may even think it sounds hypocritical.  I&#8217;m sure that government employees wouldn&#8217;t throw homeowners under the bus or use them as pawns to increase the holdings of their own pension funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
