<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Oral Arguments Video 5th DCA Hearing Gregory Taylor v Deutsche Bank National Trust	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/16/oral-arguments-video-5th-dca-hearing-gregory-taylor-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/16/oral-arguments-video-5th-dca-hearing-gregory-taylor-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/16/oral-arguments-video-5th-dca-hearing-gregory-taylor-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust/#comment-3294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=7569#comment-3294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At approximately 21:00 counsel for DBNT makes reference to an Amended Answer and indicates that it was filed out of time and cannot be considered. The court responded by noting that DBNT did not object to the Amended Answer. 

So, in pointing out that defendant did not play by the rules or follow procedure by filing the Amended Answer without leave of either plaintiff or the court she also pointed out that DBNT did not play by the rules in making a timely objection. 

Hoisted on her own pitard!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At approximately 21:00 counsel for DBNT makes reference to an Amended Answer and indicates that it was filed out of time and cannot be considered. The court responded by noting that DBNT did not object to the Amended Answer. </p>
<p>So, in pointing out that defendant did not play by the rules or follow procedure by filing the Amended Answer without leave of either plaintiff or the court she also pointed out that DBNT did not play by the rules in making a timely objection. </p>
<p>Hoisted on her own pitard!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John R.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/16/oral-arguments-video-5th-dca-hearing-gregory-taylor-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust/#comment-3291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=7569#comment-3291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WORKS NOW!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WORKS NOW!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John R.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/07/16/oral-arguments-video-5th-dca-hearing-gregory-taylor-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust/#comment-3290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=7569#comment-3290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sniff..... sniff..... sniff...... My Button Won&#039;t Work!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sniff&#8230;.. sniff&#8230;.. sniff&#8230;&#8230; My Button Won&#8217;t Work!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
