<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Bank v Ibanez, Wells Fargo Bank v Larace &#8211; Appellees &#038; Appellants Briefs to SJC	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 01:08:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chassidy Kaspar		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-656279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chassidy Kaspar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9585#comment-656279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-4611&quot;&gt;Ken dost&lt;/a&gt;.

Great analysis , BTW , you are looking for a SSA-3288 , my colleagues filled a template document here &lt;code&gt;http://goo.gl/SemhWJ&lt;/code&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-4611">Ken dost</a>.</p>
<p>Great analysis , BTW , you are looking for a SSA-3288 , my colleagues filled a template document here <code>http://goo.gl/SemhWJ</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jessica lewis		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-428175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jessica lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9585#comment-428175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are there any lawyers in pa, who deal with similar cases like ibanez and larace?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any lawyers in pa, who deal with similar cases like ibanez and larace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Foreclosure Fraud		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-5060</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foreclosure Fraud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9585#comment-5060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-5059&quot;&gt;Glenn F. Russell, Jr.&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank YOU Mr Russell! 

Feel free to contact me to discuss further. 

Michael Founder 4closureFraud.org 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-5059">Glenn F. Russell, Jr.</a>.</p>
<p>Thank YOU Mr Russell! </p>
<p>Feel free to contact me to discuss further. </p>
<p>Michael Founder 4closureFraud.org </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenn F. Russell, Jr.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-5059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn F. Russell, Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9585#comment-5059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was brought to my attention, that a post here resluted in donations to Ms. McDonnell&#039;s request for help with the defrayment of the LaRace family&#039;s printing costs of their Appellee Brief.

I wish to state that words cannot adequately express my, and my clients&#039;, gratitude for the generosity shown by those who contributed to this effort.  Make no mistake, the forclosure issue we all face today is the most significant issue that any of us have faced in our liftime, along with its direct effect in placing this country in a second and even worse great depression .  Almost everyone in America is only one financial set back away from becoming embroiled in the foreclosure nightmare.

I have been referred to as  a &quot;one man band&quot; in my battle against the Banking industry. However. I wish to assure those that derisively  classify me as such, that while it may appear that I only represent a solitary voice, in actuality I am a conduit for the collective symphony of ideas that all of us have contributed to this effort. All of your voices will be heard through mine.

I am also posting here to inform the person who authors this Blog,  that the Brief posted for the Ibanez family was submitted strictly for that case only. The LaRace Brief has not been posted here yet,

Once again,on behalf of the LaRace family

Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was brought to my attention, that a post here resluted in donations to Ms. McDonnell&#8217;s request for help with the defrayment of the LaRace family&#8217;s printing costs of their Appellee Brief.</p>
<p>I wish to state that words cannot adequately express my, and my clients&#8217;, gratitude for the generosity shown by those who contributed to this effort.  Make no mistake, the forclosure issue we all face today is the most significant issue that any of us have faced in our liftime, along with its direct effect in placing this country in a second and even worse great depression .  Almost everyone in America is only one financial set back away from becoming embroiled in the foreclosure nightmare.</p>
<p>I have been referred to as  a &#8220;one man band&#8221; in my battle against the Banking industry. However. I wish to assure those that derisively  classify me as such, that while it may appear that I only represent a solitary voice, in actuality I am a conduit for the collective symphony of ideas that all of us have contributed to this effort. All of your voices will be heard through mine.</p>
<p>I am also posting here to inform the person who authors this Blog,  that the Brief posted for the Ibanez family was submitted strictly for that case only. The LaRace Brief has not been posted here yet,</p>
<p>Once again,on behalf of the LaRace family</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken dost		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/02/us-bank-v-ibanez-wells-fargo-bank-v-larace-appellees-amp-appellants-briefs-to-sjc/#comment-4611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken dost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9585#comment-4611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Senators and Representatives,

Oregon has the distinction of now ranking third in the nation for the number of foreclosures at over 22,000. There is every reason to expect this number to explode even higher. A few of you know of my efforts over the past few years to protect the theft of our home, which still continues to this day.

It is time to be realistic and face the issue head on, not in a conciliatory manner as some of your peers have. These attempts have been futile and a waste of time. I was appalled over a senatorial bill that passed a year or so ago that was just this: conciliatory. It was no wonder why this came to be, the campaign financing records indicating an average of $20,000 from financial interests into the coffers of each of the committee members.

The fact of the matter is that there exists a preponderance of evidence supported by several other state court rulings that prove the existence of mass fraud. All one needs to do is crack the door of MERS and peer beyond. Unfortunately, Oregon supports the nonjudicial method of foreclosure or put differently rubber stamping them through.

This presents a potential problem for the state of Oregon at some point in the near future should it continue to lack in its efforts to find an effective solution. Oregon, as I see it is in violation of my Constitutional right to due process in supporting the illegal seizure of homes. It is only a matter of time before a coalition of people in similar straits come together and file suit with the ACLU against the state of Oregon.

This is not something that this state needs in times of budget shortfalls.

Oregon can rise above and set a tone for other states to follow should it take drastic action in the name of justice and its citizens; PLACE A MORATORIUM ON ALL FORECLOSURES. Not only is this justified by other state rulings, but also in the 2009 Supreme Court ruling in Cuomo v Clearinghouse Association in which it said that the OCC overstepped its bounds enforcing a policy that was contrary to Congress’ intent.

This ruling clears the path for state officials to prosecute and enforce their states civil rights and consumer protection laws that prior had been preempted by the OCC.

Please stand up for the thousands that have been destroyed by predatory and the fraudulent schemes.

I am available to speak with and present dozens of prevailing lawsuits and a host of evidence.

Thank you

Ken Dost

503-780-2911]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Senators and Representatives,</p>
<p>Oregon has the distinction of now ranking third in the nation for the number of foreclosures at over 22,000. There is every reason to expect this number to explode even higher. A few of you know of my efforts over the past few years to protect the theft of our home, which still continues to this day.</p>
<p>It is time to be realistic and face the issue head on, not in a conciliatory manner as some of your peers have. These attempts have been futile and a waste of time. I was appalled over a senatorial bill that passed a year or so ago that was just this: conciliatory. It was no wonder why this came to be, the campaign financing records indicating an average of $20,000 from financial interests into the coffers of each of the committee members.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that there exists a preponderance of evidence supported by several other state court rulings that prove the existence of mass fraud. All one needs to do is crack the door of MERS and peer beyond. Unfortunately, Oregon supports the nonjudicial method of foreclosure or put differently rubber stamping them through.</p>
<p>This presents a potential problem for the state of Oregon at some point in the near future should it continue to lack in its efforts to find an effective solution. Oregon, as I see it is in violation of my Constitutional right to due process in supporting the illegal seizure of homes. It is only a matter of time before a coalition of people in similar straits come together and file suit with the ACLU against the state of Oregon.</p>
<p>This is not something that this state needs in times of budget shortfalls.</p>
<p>Oregon can rise above and set a tone for other states to follow should it take drastic action in the name of justice and its citizens; PLACE A MORATORIUM ON ALL FORECLOSURES. Not only is this justified by other state rulings, but also in the 2009 Supreme Court ruling in Cuomo v Clearinghouse Association in which it said that the OCC overstepped its bounds enforcing a policy that was contrary to Congress’ intent.</p>
<p>This ruling clears the path for state officials to prosecute and enforce their states civil rights and consumer protection laws that prior had been preempted by the OCC.</p>
<p>Please stand up for the thousands that have been destroyed by predatory and the fraudulent schemes.</p>
<p>I am available to speak with and present dozens of prevailing lawsuits and a host of evidence.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Ken Dost</p>
<p>503-780-2911</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
