<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.: A Survey of Cases Discussing MERS’ Authority to Act	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/08/mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-a-survey-of-cases-discussing-mers-authority-to-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/08/mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-a-survey-of-cases-discussing-mers-authority-to-act/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 14:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: smallz		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/08/mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-a-survey-of-cases-discussing-mers-authority-to-act/#comment-4847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smallz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9841#comment-4847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why or how anyone would  &quot;analyze the legality of MERS&quot; when its long been established that MERS HAS NO LEGAL AUTHORITY.

Wake me up when somwone decides to take FACISM head on.

Oh wait, Richard Fine already tried.

All these half ass lawyers need to shit or get off the pot.

Thanks to technology talk is really cheap]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why or how anyone would  &#8220;analyze the legality of MERS&#8221; when its long been established that MERS HAS NO LEGAL AUTHORITY.</p>
<p>Wake me up when somwone decides to take FACISM head on.</p>
<p>Oh wait, Richard Fine already tried.</p>
<p>All these half ass lawyers need to shit or get off the pot.</p>
<p>Thanks to technology talk is really cheap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrea Guice		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/08/mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-a-survey-of-cases-discussing-mers-authority-to-act/#comment-4846</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea Guice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=9841#comment-4846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fight: Mortgage fraud/forgery, question?
Their defense&#062; Pinney v. the Merchant Bank 1904... For a junior mortgage, is the only obligation to name the mortgagee of record? .... rebuttal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fight: Mortgage fraud/forgery, question?<br />
Their defense&gt; Pinney v. the Merchant Bank 1904&#8230; For a junior mortgage, is the only obligation to name the mortgagee of record? &#8230;. rebuttal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
