Comments on: 3rd DCA – VERNERET v. FORECLOSURE ADVISORS, LLC. Reversed – A Mortgagor Need Not Obtain the Trial Court’s Permission in Order to Exercise a Right of Redemption https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/16/3rd-dca-verneret-v-foreclosure-advisors-llc-reversed-a-mortgagor-need-not-obtain-the-trial-courts-permission-in-order-to-exercise-a-right-of-redemption/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:32:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6 By: indio007 https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/16/3rd-dca-verneret-v-foreclosure-advisors-llc-reversed-a-mortgagor-need-not-obtain-the-trial-courts-permission-in-order-to-exercise-a-right-of-redemption/#comment-5098 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:32:46 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=10310#comment-5098 Why didn’t she subpoena the notary if she really didn’t sign the mortgage?

]]> By: Lit Gant https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/16/3rd-dca-verneret-v-foreclosure-advisors-llc-reversed-a-mortgagor-need-not-obtain-the-trial-courts-permission-in-order-to-exercise-a-right-of-redemption/#comment-5075 Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:05:13 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=10310#comment-5075 At least one point of law is upheld the right of redemption without need of a court order.

Keep up the good work.

Lit Gant

]]>