<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: GMAC&#8217;s Recent Foreclosure &#8220;Technicalities&#8221; Ain&#8217;t Nothin New &#8211; 2006 Order Granting Motion for Sanctions RE Fraud on the Court for False Affidavits	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/22/gmacs-recent-foreclosure-technicalities-aint-nothin-new-2006-order-granting-motion-for-sanctions-re-fraud-on-the-court-for-false-affidavits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/22/gmacs-recent-foreclosure-technicalities-aint-nothin-new-2006-order-granting-motion-for-sanctions-re-fraud-on-the-court-for-false-affidavits/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 15:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marla Gibson		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/22/gmacs-recent-foreclosure-technicalities-aint-nothin-new-2006-order-granting-motion-for-sanctions-re-fraud-on-the-court-for-false-affidavits/#comment-24437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marla Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=10713#comment-24437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m Pro Se in a lawsuit filed by GMAC in which Judge Hall in Desota Co. ordered the plaintiff to schedule mediation within a specific time. 
1st: Our schedule &quot;meeting&quot; is 1 day past the specified time
2nd: The meeting that is scheduled by plaintiff is with KeyChain Alliance which seems to be GMAC related and may not meet the judges criteria concerning  mediator 
3rd: The plaintiff was ordered to contact me with the information about the mediation with in a specific time which they did not.
4th: This lawsuit has already seen one council for the plaintiff withdraw council. Now Florida Default is council for plaintiff.
5th: My note was robo signed.
6th: 2 separate affidavits from 2 separate  servers, from 2 separate states, with 2 separate and different amounts owed.
7th: Sent my last payment back to me after they filed suit. Payment was made in good faith prior to any notice of action. 
Does any or all hold any water? Do i have a chance considering pro se representation? 
Thanks from a terrified home owner
Marla Gibson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Pro Se in a lawsuit filed by GMAC in which Judge Hall in Desota Co. ordered the plaintiff to schedule mediation within a specific time.<br />
1st: Our schedule &#8220;meeting&#8221; is 1 day past the specified time<br />
2nd: The meeting that is scheduled by plaintiff is with KeyChain Alliance which seems to be GMAC related and may not meet the judges criteria concerning  mediator<br />
3rd: The plaintiff was ordered to contact me with the information about the mediation with in a specific time which they did not.<br />
4th: This lawsuit has already seen one council for the plaintiff withdraw council. Now Florida Default is council for plaintiff.<br />
5th: My note was robo signed.<br />
6th: 2 separate affidavits from 2 separate  servers, from 2 separate states, with 2 separate and different amounts owed.<br />
7th: Sent my last payment back to me after they filed suit. Payment was made in good faith prior to any notice of action.<br />
Does any or all hold any water? Do i have a chance considering pro se representation?<br />
Thanks from a terrified home owner<br />
Marla Gibson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: housemanrob		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/09/22/gmacs-recent-foreclosure-technicalities-aint-nothin-new-2006-order-granting-motion-for-sanctions-re-fraud-on-the-court-for-false-affidavits/#comment-5474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[housemanrob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=10713#comment-5474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do judges like Sasser and Blanc, etc...etc  and the spiritual thinkers of this &#039;mind blowing&quot; scheme really believe or think they can pull this off by downplaying legal issues like FRAUD! Are they saying a little crookedness is ok if it does not get out of hand. It is too ridiculous to accept for reason or intellect.This is a CONSPIRACY. Have a look underneath the surface and once again it is about power and money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do judges like Sasser and Blanc, etc&#8230;etc  and the spiritual thinkers of this &#8216;mind blowing&#8221; scheme really believe or think they can pull this off by downplaying legal issues like FRAUD! Are they saying a little crookedness is ok if it does not get out of hand. It is too ridiculous to accept for reason or intellect.This is a CONSPIRACY. Have a look underneath the surface and once again it is about power and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
