Comments on: Oh No They Didn’t! PB Post – Legislature Did NOT Approve $9.6 Million for Judges to Listen ONLY to “Lenders”

By: Wilson

Wilson — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 22:32:05 +0000

In reply to Parker. .Very similar happened to me, this person is corrupt , he encourages bank fraud and is rewarded for it.

By: Parker

Parker — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 22:02:15 +0000

Judge Roger B. Colton; Rubber stamp for banks. The man is in the bank’s pocket. He does hearings that do not require the bank to actually file a motion, but allows the bank to verbally state a motion at the time of the hearing, and without any argument from either side, states he will take it under advisement and give a ruling in a week or so. He rules in the bank favor the same day and but only latters mails the ruling which arrives in 8 days, not too bad for a 30 mile distance and w/o a post mark thereby reducing your time to file for an appeal and ask the appellate court for an emergency hearing to stay the sale.
Constitutional guarantees for due process are circumvented by this vindictive old man who works for the banks interests for his personal gain.

By: Jupiter homeowner

Jupiter homeowner — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:01:18 +0000

Judge Colton did the same to us. Said he had to review our case it would take at least a week to make a ruling. He ruled in favor of the bank after we walked out of the court room!!!
Never reviewed our case if he did, he would of seen the law shows the case would have to be dismissed, and would not be allowed to re file, The plantiff”s witness sais under oath they didnt own the “loan or note ” The Plantiff was taken over more than a year prior to filing the lis pending and was no longer a ” bank ” and there was never a asignment made to any other bank
we need to stand out grounds agiant these banks and judges taking our homes !!!!
Appeals ourt here I come

By: Paul Jones

Paul Jones — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:14:32 +0000

These judges should need to be exposed,Lets keep it up,they think what they say in that court room will never see the light of day.

By: Lori Bangor

Lori Bangor — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:12:12 +0000

I find it disturbing that Judge Blanc said “foreclosure cases are new to most judges in the circuit”. Judge Blanc also said that “the court has provided some training to judges and plans to do more.” This is a frightening statement. Haven’t these judges been to law school? And if they don’t know anything about foreclosure cases, shouldn’t that be even more reason to listen to both sides of the issue and make a determination on the merits? Even given that foreclosure cases may be new to “most judges in the circuit”, surely they are familiar with the basics of any civil litigation, namely the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence. If you follow the rules, a foreclosure case is no different than any other civil matter. Foreclosure defendants may or may not have winning arguments, but we can’t win if we can’t make them.