Comments on: Chief Judge Peter Blanc of PBC FL Ponders Jurists’ Role in GMAC/Ally Financial Foreclosure Cases

By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny

Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:37:23 +0000

Judge Blanc,

I’m a high school drop out with absolutely no formal legal training. I am, however, still aware that jurists have latitude to act on their own initiative, without any prompting from either party. I expect you covered the Latin term “sua sponte” in law school. The Ohio federal jurists (Boyko, Rose, Holschuh, O’Malley) are clearly familiar with the term and they took appropriate action as a result.

By: housemanrob

housemanrob — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:17:00 +0000

TO MICHAEL, BRAVOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!! LET US SEE THE JUDGES RESPONSE TO THAT OFFER. I look forward to it.

By: indio007

indio007 — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:08:38 +0000

Judges act at there own peril. If wants wants to be complicit in an unlawful taking without the requisites jurisdiction it his assets on the line. It’s a sad state of affairs when a judge doesn’t know his duty to do SUBSTANTIAL justice. That would be the affidavit dummy! Would it be too difficult to perform due diligence ?
Lazy bastard. Most of these affidavits are defective ON THEIR FACE.

Connely v Woods
These are the only grounds upon which it is claimed that the justice of the peace did not have jurisdiction to issue the order of attachment, or that he wrongfully issued the same. Are these grounds sufficient to render the justice liable? We would hardly think they are. The affidavit for the order of attachment was sufficient on its face;….
The affidavit for the order of attachment was sufficient on its face; and the affidavit is the principal thing upon which a justice of the peace issues the order of attachment,…..

What happens when not sufficient on it’s face? HE/SHE is liable for his actions.

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:09:45 +0000

OK – Michael excuse me for the first semi-commercial posting on your site but I want this one on the record.

Judge Blanc: We at little Legalprise have a monster database and technology that scans for fraud electronically. We also have systems we haven’t started to use to crowd-source and verify documents: allowing the public to check them. Our primary hurdle is obtaining data — getting electronic copies of the documents — but if you’d just issue an order we’d get them from the Clerk at absolutely no cost to the County and allow them to be audited by the public at no charge.

We’re just down the street from the Courthouse and happy to come over anytime, explain how we can take the case files electronically (again, at no cost to the County), and allow others to inspect and flag them for fraud, besides the auditing work our servers do automatically. Just call: 561-847-3443 or write olenick -at- legalprise.com.

PS: Any other judge or Clerk that wants the same .. same offer. Happy to publish the case files for the public to review and flag w/ concerns, as well as electronically audit. It won’t cost your County anything at all.