Comments on: Toxic Titles Part Deux – Linda Green of Docx (et al?) Did NOT Have Signing Authority on Behalf of MERS

By: Ashley

Ashley — Sat, 03 Jun 2017 23:43:57 +0000

How do we find more of the research you have done? I just finished reading “Chain of Title”. The second wave is going on!!

By: Nathanael

Nathanael — Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:29:05 +0000

In reply to indio007.

MERS was a fraud from *day one*. Its entire *purpose* — stated openly on its website — was to cheat local governments out of their mortgage recording fees!

As you might imagine, the entire structure of it was illegal. By illegal, I mean simply that it never legally transferred the ownership of any mortgage to anyone other than the original lender, even though it pretended to. Sloppy sloppy…. and a fraud against the people who bought the “mortgage-backed securities”.

The banks have been trying to paper over this unfortunate fact with fraud against the courts and fraud against the homeowners, which is what this entire blog documents. Unfortunately all too many people in power have gone along with the banks’ fairy story about MERS, rather than noticing that it was a deliberate fraud from day one.

By: fighting mad, mad as hell

fighting mad, mad as hell — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:06:25 +0000

Does this mean that we get to file against the banks now?
How do we go about getting our homes back?
In my case, what do I do? My house has already been sold.
What about the total disruption of our lives, loss of property, the cost of restarting from nothing, the stress and the embarassment? No one believed me when I said that the whole process was wrong, that GMAC lied to me, gave me the runaround for months.
Will there be a class action or do we sue them for ourselves?
I’d sure love to foreclose on their properties!

By: fighting mad, mad as hell

fighting mad, mad as hell — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:59:30 +0000

In reply to indio007.

That has been the problem from the start, everybody fell into line with the “banks must be right” mindset and played the game by the banks rules.
It’s taken years for folks to wake up and realize what has been going on.
Judges, lawyers, homeowners and baliffs all simply did what the banks said to do. The banks set the rules for how the foreclosures were going to go and at first nobody questions anything.
What is bugging me is that there are still sites, including the HUD official site, that tell people to try to get a modification, walk away, short sell, all the things that didn’t work and only made the hole deeper and wider and harder to get out of.
That is the beauty of a perfect con, the victim does all the work for the con man, all the con man has to do is collect his goodies.
Who would’ve ever thought that the banks would do the robbing?

By: indio007

indio007 — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:04:09 +0000

The fact is MERS doesn’t have the authority without some proof of agency from the payee of the note. You can’t grant authority you don’t have. Which of course makes me reflect back on the Deed of Trust in which the Trustor/Borrower grants rights to MERS that subrogate the rights of the note holder. This would make the note NON-negotiable because conditions are placed on the note. Why is no one claiming the note is NON-negotiable and broadening their defenses????

Not to mention that the original text doesn’t say pay to the order that is stamped on retroactively.

it’s just blowing my mind that everyone is acquiescing to the negotiable instrument claim.

By: leapfrog

leapfrog — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:10:06 +0000

Why is any of this acceptable to the court? Why is this allowed? How on earth can you “replace” or “substitute” fraud for more fraud???

By: Tim Barker

Tim Barker — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:37:56 +0000

so does this mean they just get to file corrective paperwork without voiding the judgement?

By: housemanrob

housemanrob — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:41:42 +0000

Hey everybody, Our courts have become a CIRCUS. The only reason they will NOT allow us to attend public hearings, using excuses like the fire marshall to keep us out, is so they can sell TICKETS when the HIGH WIRE act performed by the banksters is included, in these courts, when this “house of cards” falls down!

By: foreclosurefight

foreclosurefight — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:06:56 +0000

“Kathy Smith” is bogus as well…she is a “Robo Signer” who has ties with American Home Mortgage Servicing, Deutsche Bank, Ameriquest just to name a few…

Just google “Kathy Smith” “AHMSI” “Deutsche” and you should be able to find plenty of examples…

She is tied to AHMSI in Texas…and I think that she is an Attorney as well…