I am interested! Please email me @ alliebuster2@yahoo.com

Cite the exemption from the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act which prohibits the Attorney General from investigating attorneys. If there was one, don’t you think Judge Cox or Richman would have been able to cite it?

According to you and Judge Cox, attorneys can do anything including commit crimes, but no one other than the Florida Bar can investigate or discipline them. Did you forget about equal rights or liberty and justice for all?

It should be obvious that the prosecutors are feeling the heat due to their obvious failure to hold any of these criminals accountable for their crimes, and some are starting to take action.

I expect Judge Cox to go to jail before too long, and he will be in the company of his friends from the big bad banks, their attorneys and those who do favors them.

I would be interested. I have been one of those concientious struggling homeowners and have been current on my mortgage until this month. I recieved notice from the Servicer that my interest rate had been reduced by .5% and yet my mortgage had increased by $112. Nothing they tell me makes any logical sense so I told them I would see them in court. I am stuck in an option arm which I was NOT Informed of prior to signing. So the battle starts here, and I would really appreciate any guidance you can offer.

It is exactly ‘CIRCLE’ I had, they push our Complaints to each other and no one want to be responsible. Please, DORMANMOM, send me your Complaint, they do pretty much the same offence. My Complaint almost ready but I need to correct something. My E-mail: mc737@juno.com. If anyone has same advice I am open to consider it. Thank you so much! Million thanks to holders of this website! God bless you!

He is fundamentally wrong: The AG’s has a right to investigate and prosecute ANY crime in Florida.

Florida bar does not have the power to convict criminals, it’s only power is to enforce it’s own rules of professional conduct and ultimately, the most it can do is disbar lawyers.

The AG has jurisdiction and a MANDATE to prosecute crimes in the State of Florida. That is his job.

The AG also has a duty, as does every other officer of the State and officers of the State Courts, to protect the integrity of the public records.

Past AG’s have issued written opinions strongly warning other state officers and clerks of courts about this duty. It is a duty the AG cannot himself ignore, especially when the statutes state that recording fraudulent documents in the public record is a felony, as is causing them to be recorded (preparing them and having them recorded even if not in your hand) and / or recording documents to perpetrate a felony.

I think you will see an emergency appeal from the AG’s office. Maybe not. He is a pussy and also running for office. When I first read the subpoenas I thought he is going after the wrong documents and the wrong issues. Incidentally I also thought they were going to be challenged as over board. They could have been better crafted.

I think we may well find out someone has empaneled a grand jury that is looking into this matter. This could lead to indictments and search warrants, where the state or feds come in and take away not just the documents requested, but ALL their documents and computers. Thy don’t like doing that to law firms because of the attorney client privilege involved, but if pushed, the AG just might.

I notice a number of people telling me they cannot talk about xxx or yyy, but I will find out more later. I hope this is not because their counsel has asked them not to talk, and hope it is not because they are too paranoid, but because there is a real criminal investigation going on somewhere.

Why would a judge enter an opinion that even a first year law student could figure out was horribly wrong? Maybe it is a way of buying S&F time to dispose of the bodies by cleaning up their files?
Maybe it is because he thinks the Appellate court will agree the subpoena is over broad and withstand appellate challenge on that issue alone, hoping the appellate court restricts it’s ruling to that issue and lets the snub to the AG pass.

Maybe the AG will let it slide, comeing back with a whole series of very narrow and targeted subpoenas. Each one a narrow targeted request, for example:

A) Every AOM prepared by S&F and executed after the action commenced, along with the associated pleading.
B) All communications, documents and payments between S&F and DOCX,
C) Same for FIS & LPS & Saxon Mortgage

https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B1wtyXDQr0s-YzRiODAwYTMtZWRkZS00ZGM4LWE2ZGYtZGFiNzc2M2MyYTFm&hl=en