<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Judge Denies Protective Order of Removal of Jeffrey Stephan&#8217;s Deposition from &#8220;Internet Blog&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joyce		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-8128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-8128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7994&quot;&gt;Michael&lt;/a&gt;.

Well said !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7994">Michael</a>.</p>
<p>Well said !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joyce		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-8127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-8127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7992&quot;&gt;yvonne&lt;/a&gt;.

If a plaintiff lawyer lies the first time around, why is it OK for them to re-package their lie and serve it to me agaiin?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7992">yvonne</a>.</p>
<p>If a plaintiff lawyer lies the first time around, why is it OK for them to re-package their lie and serve it to me agaiin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Loubriel		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-8010</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Loubriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-8010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Slowly but surely we will prevail......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slowly but surely we will prevail&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Officer of the Law		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-8005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Officer of the Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-8005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7994&quot;&gt;Michael&lt;/a&gt;.

Very well said!  Now is the time to stand up and demand that justice is done!!!  

Fraud is a crime, and those who commit fraud have unclean hands which bars foreclosure.   

The banksters who caused this mess need to be prosecuted, and their assets need to be seized to repay their victims, both homeowners who had their homes stolen and investors who invested in the bankers&#039; fraudulent securities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7994">Michael</a>.</p>
<p>Very well said!  Now is the time to stand up and demand that justice is done!!!  </p>
<p>Fraud is a crime, and those who commit fraud have unclean hands which bars foreclosure.   </p>
<p>The banksters who caused this mess need to be prosecuted, and their assets need to be seized to repay their victims, both homeowners who had their homes stolen and investors who invested in the bankers&#8217; fraudulent securities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7992&quot;&gt;yvonne&lt;/a&gt;.

GMAC &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; the US Government; Treasury is the majority shareholder.

All the &quot;banks&quot; that played in mortgages at the investment banking level are really just a collection of the offshore SIV&#039;s; only the &quot;super senior&quot; debt was held by some US banks, and even then a lot of that was really just risk they quietly shifted back when it was clear that Treasury was going to bail them out for their incompetent lending decisions.

We&#039;ve broken the market, gutted our court system, allowed crooks to loot the Treasury, and now tried to gut the first amendment to protect a bunch of incompetent bond traders who refused to accept the losses they signed up for.

Of course, the invisible hand &lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; wins; the only question is whether it forces things into place with a gentle nudge, a hard push, or a violent smack.  It&#039;s unbeatable, and always has been.  

The paper those notes are printed on is virtually worthless: we need to stop pretending otherwise and just let the too big to fail crowd meet the destiny they signed up for.  Smarter bankers will take their place who, as real bond traders like Lew Ranieri understand, will work with their borrowers not out of a sense of compassion (though nothing is wrong with that) but because that is what makes the most financial sense.  

This country is faced with what is arguably the worst crisis since the civil war; now is the time for real people, no matter what their political persuasion, race, socio-economic class, or anything else -- to stand up, meet the challenge, protect one another and our children, and demand that justice be done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7992">yvonne</a>.</p>
<p>GMAC <i>is</i> the US Government; Treasury is the majority shareholder.</p>
<p>All the &#8220;banks&#8221; that played in mortgages at the investment banking level are really just a collection of the offshore SIV&#8217;s; only the &#8220;super senior&#8221; debt was held by some US banks, and even then a lot of that was really just risk they quietly shifted back when it was clear that Treasury was going to bail them out for their incompetent lending decisions.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve broken the market, gutted our court system, allowed crooks to loot the Treasury, and now tried to gut the first amendment to protect a bunch of incompetent bond traders who refused to accept the losses they signed up for.</p>
<p>Of course, the invisible hand <b>always</b> wins; the only question is whether it forces things into place with a gentle nudge, a hard push, or a violent smack.  It&#8217;s unbeatable, and always has been.  </p>
<p>The paper those notes are printed on is virtually worthless: we need to stop pretending otherwise and just let the too big to fail crowd meet the destiny they signed up for.  Smarter bankers will take their place who, as real bond traders like Lew Ranieri understand, will work with their borrowers not out of a sense of compassion (though nothing is wrong with that) but because that is what makes the most financial sense.  </p>
<p>This country is faced with what is arguably the worst crisis since the civil war; now is the time for real people, no matter what their political persuasion, race, socio-economic class, or anything else &#8212; to stand up, meet the challenge, protect one another and our children, and demand that justice be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: yvonne		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yvonne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some judges in  Miami  are allowing the banks attorneys from David Sterns office to ammend their original  complaints without first notifying the defendant for approval or acceptance...and they  are  requesting that the defendant not respond....
GMAC is  not  really  local...but  foreign, hiding behind Deutche Bank, research Deutch Bank and get an eye opener   how they  funded Hitler etc....and  how  long  they  have  been in  this country under adifferent guise...
why  is  GMAC hell bent  on supporting  them????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some judges in  Miami  are allowing the banks attorneys from David Sterns office to ammend their original  complaints without first notifying the defendant for approval or acceptance&#8230;and they  are  requesting that the defendant not respond&#8230;.<br />
GMAC is  not  really  local&#8230;but  foreign, hiding behind Deutche Bank, research Deutch Bank and get an eye opener   how they  funded Hitler etc&#8230;.and  how  long  they  have  been in  this country under adifferent guise&#8230;<br />
why  is  GMAC hell bent  on supporting  them????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marla		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We are suppose to feel compassion for GMAC and its employees because they are embarrased for their own fraudulent practices.  Tell me when I should start to shed a tear.  They can all crawl in the holes they came from if they cannot face the fact that they did this to themselves.  If the employees of GMAC are so embarrased then they should just quit their jobs.  Oh wait that might mean they may into foreclosure and we can have that now can we?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are suppose to feel compassion for GMAC and its employees because they are embarrased for their own fraudulent practices.  Tell me when I should start to shed a tear.  They can all crawl in the holes they came from if they cannot face the fact that they did this to themselves.  If the employees of GMAC are so embarrased then they should just quit their jobs.  Oh wait that might mean they may into foreclosure and we can have that now can we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BlaqRubi		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BlaqRubi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7838&quot;&gt;Joblogger&lt;/a&gt;.

Bout dayn time!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7838">Joblogger</a>.</p>
<p>Bout dayn time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BlaqRubi		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BlaqRubi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am LOVING IT!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am LOVING IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/15/judge-denies-protective-order-of-removal-jeffrey-stephans-deposition-from-internet-blog/#comment-7867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=12739#comment-7867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They tried to usurp the first amendment!  The first amendment!!! The cornerstone of our entire country.

Bankers.  Read the first amendment.  Think about why the framers wrote it.  Then read the next amendment they wrote and think about the message they were relaying should #1 ever be subject to what you just tried.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They tried to usurp the first amendment!  The first amendment!!! The cornerstone of our entire country.</p>
<p>Bankers.  Read the first amendment.  Think about why the framers wrote it.  Then read the next amendment they wrote and think about the message they were relaying should #1 ever be subject to what you just tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
