<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Florida Rule 1.110(b) &#8211; Bank of America Verification of Foreclosure Complaint is a JOKE	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: brendan n		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-12789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brendan n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-12789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10908&quot;&gt;Whippy FLoggman&lt;/a&gt;.

can i get list of bank of america robo-signers? thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10908">Whippy FLoggman</a>.</p>
<p>can i get list of bank of america robo-signers? thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-12420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-12420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whippy, can you also send me a list of Robo-signer names?  Where else can I go to look for a list of Robo-signer names???  Anybody know?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whippy, can you also send me a list of Robo-signer names?  Where else can I go to look for a list of Robo-signer names???  Anybody know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FightPredatoryLenders		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-11004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FightPredatoryLenders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-11004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10909&quot;&gt;Whippy FLoggman&lt;/a&gt;.

Whippy, could you send that list of BofA signers to me also. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10909">Whippy FLoggman</a>.</p>
<p>Whippy, could you send that list of BofA signers to me also. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elaine S		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I sn&#039;t the court clerk responsible for making sure there was a notarization on the &quot;sworn&quot; document before accepting it into the file?   


When are judges going to start &quot;dismissing with prejudice,&quot; whenever there is obvious fraud or perjury upon the court?  Maybe its time to put some of the spotlight on the judges, and how many cases a day some of these rocket docket judges did in a day. They too have a responsibilty to know their cases so as to make  informed decisions.  If none or next to none of the paperwork is attached to an affidavit where an MBS is named, a judge should be able to tell the affidavit is potentially fraud on the court just by the lack of a stack of papers, cause I&#039;ve read the average MBS ownership entails the mortgage/deed of trust having been transferred at least four times. Every transfer must have its own documentation to show the links of the chain of title, I do believe.

And someone pointed out unelected judges have no right per the FL Constitution to be sitting for these foreclosure cases.  Anyone know more about that? Or doing anything about that?


How about a team of volunteers doing amicus briefs pointing out some of the obvious defects in  files and all calling on one targeted  judge to look at the entire set of his  files himself,  to cause the judge to be responsible as much as the attorney that plead it.  Or just a team of volunteers watching a judge&#039;s case load, and keep records of what foreclosures he&#039;s hearing and do them same with them, after he has ruled.   Offer the list of defects found to him. And  be polite in pointing out that better given to him than to the press. 

Would an attorney put up a simple fill-in the blank form for filing such a submission? Each county may be different in some regards. A simple beginner&#039;s checklist, and obviously not  a complete one, could be of great benefit.   I don&#039;t know Florida but in my state, unless its sealed I can go and ask to look at the file of any case before the court..  If one judge had several volunteers go through say  5 files each  for a simple list of possible defects. And called them all to his attention, then that judge would become very aware of what may have been glossed over before that point.

And if you have  a list of robo-signers and you&#039;re sure of your information, please send them to states&#039; attorneys general, especially Att Gen Cordray in Ohio. He called for every case with a certain robo-signer&#039;s name in the file from 133 judges in his state! . With that precedent maybe we can get this kind of call in multiple states for every known-to-be robo-signor, and every lender/servicer/MBStrustee known to be using robo-signers.

Also who is comparing the signatures of notaries on their licensing document with the one they are using now?   FL  statute requires using the same name in their signature as they were commissioned under, not some initials. I do believe , by itself it is grounds to nullify the document that would need a valid notarization.  Every judge should know to never accept a notary signature that is just an initial.  How does one correctly subpoena a true copy of  that licensing signature in the FL secretary of state&#039;s records? Do a little research. 
Know your notary statute.  Google &quot; FL Statute notary public law  and read at least 4 or 5 entries. Reading one will often suggest the next sub-topic. and keep notes or print outs of what you found AND where you found it in a statute, by number, and so you can find it again.

In my mind every attorney filing in defense of a foreclosure upon their client could claim the doctrine of clean hands, and demand dismissal with prejudice for lack of clean hands, or however that is technically done correctly. Maybe lack of standing for the entire Plaintiff-entity to come before the court in the state from now on?
  
Remember, I do believe, that  the principle is responsible for the acts of its agents and employees acting in the normal course of their assigned duties. If enough attorneys start screaming about unclean hands it could make a huge difference for a huge number of people.
 ( I am not an attorney, seek legal advise. Just educate yourself  and prepare so you can use your attorneys time wisely.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sn&#8217;t the court clerk responsible for making sure there was a notarization on the &#8220;sworn&#8221; document before accepting it into the file?   </p>
<p>When are judges going to start &#8220;dismissing with prejudice,&#8221; whenever there is obvious fraud or perjury upon the court?  Maybe its time to put some of the spotlight on the judges, and how many cases a day some of these rocket docket judges did in a day. They too have a responsibilty to know their cases so as to make  informed decisions.  If none or next to none of the paperwork is attached to an affidavit where an MBS is named, a judge should be able to tell the affidavit is potentially fraud on the court just by the lack of a stack of papers, cause I&#8217;ve read the average MBS ownership entails the mortgage/deed of trust having been transferred at least four times. Every transfer must have its own documentation to show the links of the chain of title, I do believe.</p>
<p>And someone pointed out unelected judges have no right per the FL Constitution to be sitting for these foreclosure cases.  Anyone know more about that? Or doing anything about that?</p>
<p>How about a team of volunteers doing amicus briefs pointing out some of the obvious defects in  files and all calling on one targeted  judge to look at the entire set of his  files himself,  to cause the judge to be responsible as much as the attorney that plead it.  Or just a team of volunteers watching a judge&#8217;s case load, and keep records of what foreclosures he&#8217;s hearing and do them same with them, after he has ruled.   Offer the list of defects found to him. And  be polite in pointing out that better given to him than to the press. </p>
<p>Would an attorney put up a simple fill-in the blank form for filing such a submission? Each county may be different in some regards. A simple beginner&#8217;s checklist, and obviously not  a complete one, could be of great benefit.   I don&#8217;t know Florida but in my state, unless its sealed I can go and ask to look at the file of any case before the court..  If one judge had several volunteers go through say  5 files each  for a simple list of possible defects. And called them all to his attention, then that judge would become very aware of what may have been glossed over before that point.</p>
<p>And if you have  a list of robo-signers and you&#8217;re sure of your information, please send them to states&#8217; attorneys general, especially Att Gen Cordray in Ohio. He called for every case with a certain robo-signer&#8217;s name in the file from 133 judges in his state! . With that precedent maybe we can get this kind of call in multiple states for every known-to-be robo-signor, and every lender/servicer/MBStrustee known to be using robo-signers.</p>
<p>Also who is comparing the signatures of notaries on their licensing document with the one they are using now?   FL  statute requires using the same name in their signature as they were commissioned under, not some initials. I do believe , by itself it is grounds to nullify the document that would need a valid notarization.  Every judge should know to never accept a notary signature that is just an initial.  How does one correctly subpoena a true copy of  that licensing signature in the FL secretary of state&#8217;s records? Do a little research.<br />
Know your notary statute.  Google &#8221; FL Statute notary public law  and read at least 4 or 5 entries. Reading one will often suggest the next sub-topic. and keep notes or print outs of what you found AND where you found it in a statute, by number, and so you can find it again.</p>
<p>In my mind every attorney filing in defense of a foreclosure upon their client could claim the doctrine of clean hands, and demand dismissal with prejudice for lack of clean hands, or however that is technically done correctly. Maybe lack of standing for the entire Plaintiff-entity to come before the court in the state from now on?</p>
<p>Remember, I do believe, that  the principle is responsible for the acts of its agents and employees acting in the normal course of their assigned duties. If enough attorneys start screaming about unclean hands it could make a huge difference for a huge number of people.<br />
 ( I am not an attorney, seek legal advise. Just educate yourself  and prepare so you can use your attorneys time wisely.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael from Legalprise		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael from Legalprise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10910&quot;&gt;Joe Esquivel&lt;/a&gt;.

Will you send them to me?  I&#039;m working on a game to let people whip through them in bulk but it&#039;d be great to start w/ a set of signatures we know are real, or at least with something besides people just guessing.  Working on getting it online; have one million docs to start, and that&#039;s just the beginning; imagine there&#039;s a couple hundred million for the crowd to scan through by the time the whole country&#039;s records are online.

Michael Olenick, olenick-at-legalprise.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10910">Joe Esquivel</a>.</p>
<p>Will you send them to me?  I&#8217;m working on a game to let people whip through them in bulk but it&#8217;d be great to start w/ a set of signatures we know are real, or at least with something besides people just guessing.  Working on getting it online; have one million docs to start, and that&#8217;s just the beginning; imagine there&#8217;s a couple hundred million for the crowd to scan through by the time the whole country&#8217;s records are online.</p>
<p>Michael Olenick, olenick-at-legalprise.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Whippy FLoggman		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whippy FLoggman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Florida, the court fonts are 14 pt, double spaced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Florida, the court fonts are 14 pt, double spaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Whippy FLoggman		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whippy FLoggman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10910&quot;&gt;Joe Esquivel&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Joe,

I have a List of all names, not signatures.  However, you can look them up with relative ease if you want to view the signatures and multiple titles ( other than BAC ).. Give me your Email, and I will send you the pdf. in attachment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10910">Joe Esquivel</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Joe,</p>
<p>I have a List of all names, not signatures.  However, you can look them up with relative ease if you want to view the signatures and multiple titles ( other than BAC ).. Give me your Email, and I will send you the pdf. in attachment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dahotruth		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dahotruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Welcome to McDonald&#039;s .....Would you like fries with that affidavit?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to McDonald&#8217;s &#8230;..Would you like fries with that affidavit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Esquivel		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Esquivel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10909&quot;&gt;Whippy FLoggman&lt;/a&gt;.

can you please send me the list of BAC Robo signers that you know of so I can compare them against the ones who are signing my documents.

thank you
Joe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10909">Whippy FLoggman</a>.</p>
<p>can you please send me the list of BAC Robo signers that you know of so I can compare them against the ones who are signing my documents.</p>
<p>thank you<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Whippy FLoggman		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/11/01/florida-rule-1-110b-bank-of-america-verification-of-foreclosure-complaint-is-a-joke/#comment-10909</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whippy FLoggman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=13780#comment-10909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not Hartsler, its Robert Rybarczyk.  I have a list of all BAC ROBO&#039;s,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Hartsler, its Robert Rybarczyk.  I have a list of all BAC ROBO&#8217;s,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
