Comments on: KABOOM – Full Deposition of Tamara Price Citi Robo-signer Extraordinaire

By: Recoveryless Recovery

Recoveryless Recovery — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:06:40 +0000

Is that a picture of a nuclear mushroom cloud up above or simply a snapshot of QE2?

By: RAMONA

RAMONA — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:37:51 +0000

In reply to Nelson J Velardo. If we continue to let them steal our property,which they have been doing now for going on 4 yrs ...it will take the masses because congress has done nothing to protect us . we have to protect ourselves. they are getting prepared or we?

By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny

Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:54:52 +0000

In reply to erkme73.

They have known since before 2009.

Look at In Re Hill, the “recreated letters,” and the downfall of Countrywide. There is at least one thread over on MSFraud that covers In Re Hill:

http://ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=2406472&pid=1266034869#post1266034869

By: erkme73

erkme73 — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:55:29 +0000

Anyone else notice the date of this deposition? ’09? Really? They knew since ’09???

By: Dan Junk

Dan Junk — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:59:47 +0000

In reply to Dan Junk. The document is now marked private on Scribd. Do you have it? Or do you have the reporting company name so we can order a copy?

By: Dan Junk

Dan Junk — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:51:06 +0000

Niiiice. Great work. Citi has tried to act above the rest as if it was clean. They are as dirty as any of them.

By: Whippy FLoggman

Whippy FLoggman — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:47:09 +0000

Have not seen one depo where the Witness had Personal Knowledge or Reviewed the Records. But I have noticed a accepted pattern of business whereby other people, other firms have prepared & reviewed the DOCS which serves the notion of willful, premeditated Fraud upon the Court.

By: Nelson J Velardo

Nelson J Velardo — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:37:01 +0000

It may be coming to the place and time where” We The People” may be left with no alternative other than imposing the will of the masses by force, lest we fulfill the prophetic words of one of our most brilliant founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson:

“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.”

By: housemanrob

housemanrob — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:54:16 +0000

This is more ridiculous robo-signer crap extraudinaire. Over and over again the same obvious fraud, not even a ” slap on the wrist”. Anybody paying arrention, it’s not rocket science, would see the obvious mass conspiracy all this money has caused. THESE BANKSTERS AND THEIR CRONIES NEED TO BE STOPPED and we need to do whatever is necessary!! Save the children and god bless. By the way………wonderful work guys.

By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny

Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 17:15:46 +0000

I imagine this must have been a nerve wracking experience for the witness. Clearly she put up resistance to answering Kowalskis questions directly. Ultimately though the truth of it was expressed. Ms. Price had no personal knowledge of any of the things contained in the affidavits or assignments she signed.

I remind all that Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 56(g) states:

“(g) Affidavits Submitted in Bad Faith.

If satisfied that an affidavit under this rule is submitted in bad faith or solely for delay, the court must order the submitting party to pay the other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, it incurred as a result. An offending party or attorney may also be held in contempt.” [emphsis added]

Note the unambiguous language: “…the court MUST order the submitting party to pay the other party the reasonable expenses, INCLUDING ATTORNEY’S FEES…”

Any of you broke deadbeats (tongue in cheek) out there in need of a way to pay for an attorney could suggest this as a means for counsel to be compensated. Check for the corresponding local rule.