Comments on: Foreclosuregate – U.S. Trustee Taking On Banks in Mortgage Mess – NYTimes

By: Prince Ella Green

Prince Ella Green — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:44:37 +0000

We have begged ever agency you can think of to help us since 2001, even the U.S. Trustee. After being attacked at work as a U.S. Letter Carrier by a vicious dog in 91″, we filed a chapter 13. Cenlar Federal Savings Loan was given permission to lift the “STAY” on 427 4th St North, located in Texas City, Texas. But they never took possession of the property. It is vacate. We were issued a discharge in 2000. The debt continues in our name to date with MidFirst, it was re-sold 2 different times since 2001. Yes we sued, but Judge Wayne Mallia issued a judgment against us that we sign Midland Mortgage (MidFirst Bank) settlement agreement, which include the re-payment of the 2000 FHA/HUD discharge mortgage debt. The judge would not allow the Lawsuit to go to trial, he is forecing us to sign this contract that we never saw. If we refuse we could go to jail/fine. Attorney Steven Leyh some how filed the unsigned settlement agreement, claiming that we agreed to accept $40,000 for their illegal practices and that we agreed to re-pay the debt. We told the judge that Leyh had lied and 10 years was a long time to be hounded for a discharged debt. The story can be read in the Houston Chronicle, Google “Zombie Debt Refuse To Die, Prince Ella” Can someone tell me how can anyone force a debtor to re-pay a legally discharged fha/hud mortgage debt? What good is a DISCHARGE ORDER? The court has looked on as MidFirst Bank rape me with this discharged debt. But, the case is on APPEAL at the 14th Court of Appeals and the 5th Circuit Court Of Appeals. MidFirst is cold blooded to have bought a 2000 discharged mortgage debt and then attempt to harass, threaten, and collect the debt. We are now almost 60, disabled and it is 15 years since we filed (1995). Today is December 1, 2010, my birthday, but its just another day, a day of war. So, this article is true, 4closurefraud is right on the money. I’m hard pressed to do something out of the norm, I should not have to, but I have no chioce. pgreen019@comcast.net

By: trust hater

trust hater — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:38:12 +0000

Looks more like damage control to me, sure it might halt or slow down a few foreclosures, looks more like they are making themselves look pretty by doing this and are infact supporting the banks with this strategy.
(Are they trying to gain peoples trust perhaps?)

Worst thing is why don’t they teach people about law i school? they assume the incompetence position in court all the time, but how can that be so, if they never told people how important law was and don’t make it something that needs ot be known about form a young age. (probably because they know how corrupt law is and kids wouldn’t put up with all the nonsense)

this kind of deception is cruel at best.

sorry for going off topic, but the fact they don’t teach people law at school from an early age shows just how deceitful they are about everything.

I’m not convinced about the U.S. Trustee doing anything else other than damage control on their reputation.

By: acmodspecialists

acmodspecialists — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:54:42 +0000

This is god if banks start finding it more difficult to foreclose or FRAUD-CLOSE and we make sure they are not over the Law It could make Banksters think more before foreclosing in a Homeowner and may be more willing to do a Loan Modification, as it is right now the incentives for the banks are to foreclose (they collect AIG insurance etc) and commit fraud to foreclosure, We need to make it more balance towards the homeowner Most important a foreclosure home is bad for the economy, The state, The city, Their community, and the american family, When a Loan Modification is approved all the houses around it that property, wont go down on value, It will make that family be more certain about their future , this family start spending money on their home, if they were thinking about buying new furniture, a new stove, a new dish washer, a carpet etc If they are now sure that they are going to stay in their home, they will spend the money and will help all those industries, there is nothing better for the economy than to modify a loan instead of foreclosing

By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny

Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:29:29 +0000

A nice article. I’m pleased to see US Justice, in the form of the Trustees, finally taking some meaningful interests in the issues.

There are two other cases in which Trustees have put forth some efforts: In Re Wilson in Louisiana and In Re Hill in Pennsylvania. I continue to hope for national media to pick up either of these stories as they involved evidence fabrication and false swearing.

Some of the pleadings in these cases can be found at: http://www.scribd.com/wjr__10

Wilson is set for a hearing on the US Trustees Motion for Sanctions against Fidelity/LPS on Wednesday of the coming week – December 1, 2010.

Hill had a hearing on a motion for sanctions on Monday, November 22, 2010. That hearing has been continued.

Having sanctions imposed in either of these cases may have deep impact and significance.