<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FL 1st DCA Default Judgment REVERSED &#8211; Appellants were “under the reasonable belief that the foreclosure action had been abated.” During Loan Mod	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Concerned		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/#comment-15665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Concerned]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=15271#comment-15665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/#comment-15656&quot;&gt;indio007&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree that these judges should receive notice that any cases where they have refused to correctly apply the law, such as the failure to even conduct an evidentuary hearing, will be grounds to reduce their salary. In fact the costs of the full attorneys fees and the costs of the appelate court should be borne by the judges whose failure led to the case needing an appeal.

Such a change to the &#039;contract&#039; with which the judges serve the state would give the judges an incentive to stop playing favorites with the banks.

These judges do not want these cases. Too BAD. It is time the judges experienced repercussions from their faulty work.

I think the appeals courts should start handing out smack-downs for the judges. Let the judges have to let some homeless perosn they caused to improperly loose THEIR home to get to occupy the JUDGE&#039;s residence. Let the Judge have to move into the a homeless shelter for a month, while continuing to work on non-foreclosure cases. No special cot in the judge&#039;s office should be the substitiute either. If he&#039;s married, let the spouse stay in a hotel at her expense. No access should be allowed by either of them to their house, just as would happen if they had lost it to a foreclosure.

Do you think the judges in this country would stop being the bankster&#039;s patsies if this happened to a few of their cronies?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/#comment-15656">indio007</a>.</p>
<p>I agree that these judges should receive notice that any cases where they have refused to correctly apply the law, such as the failure to even conduct an evidentuary hearing, will be grounds to reduce their salary. In fact the costs of the full attorneys fees and the costs of the appelate court should be borne by the judges whose failure led to the case needing an appeal.</p>
<p>Such a change to the &#8216;contract&#8217; with which the judges serve the state would give the judges an incentive to stop playing favorites with the banks.</p>
<p>These judges do not want these cases. Too BAD. It is time the judges experienced repercussions from their faulty work.</p>
<p>I think the appeals courts should start handing out smack-downs for the judges. Let the judges have to let some homeless perosn they caused to improperly loose THEIR home to get to occupy the JUDGE&#8217;s residence. Let the Judge have to move into the a homeless shelter for a month, while continuing to work on non-foreclosure cases. No special cot in the judge&#8217;s office should be the substitiute either. If he&#8217;s married, let the spouse stay in a hotel at her expense. No access should be allowed by either of them to their house, just as would happen if they had lost it to a foreclosure.</p>
<p>Do you think the judges in this country would stop being the bankster&#8217;s patsies if this happened to a few of their cronies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: indio007		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2010/12/08/fl-1st-dca-default-judgment-reversed-appellants-were-under-the-reasonable-belief-that-the-foreclosure-action-had-been-abated-during-loan-mod/#comment-15656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indio007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=15271#comment-15656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another example of the abuse &quot;rubber stamp&quot;. Why pay filing fees or this judges salary if he won&#039;t do anything &quot;judicial&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example of the abuse &#8220;rubber stamp&#8221;. Why pay filing fees or this judges salary if he won&#8217;t do anything &#8220;judicial&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
