Comments on: No Federal Preemption by a Trustee of a Mortgage Backed Security Trust from Senior Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/no-federal-preemption-by-a-trustee-of-a-mortgage-backed-security-trust-from-senior-counsel-of-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-currency-2/ - Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE Wed, 03 Dec 2025 16:55:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: pparke500 https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/no-federal-preemption-by-a-trustee-of-a-mortgage-backed-security-trust-from-senior-counsel-of-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-currency-2/#comment-17685 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:08:26 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=16693#comment-17685 Oh, I want to thank 4foreclosurefraud for posting this letter. I heard a lawyer in Judge Starnes court allude to it so it will be nice to have a copy when I face Judge Starnes. The atty was arguing that the bank was a foreign corp and needed to post a bond. That fell on deaf ears but I’m trying it again in my motion to dismiss.

]]> By: pparke500 https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/no-federal-preemption-by-a-trustee-of-a-mortgage-backed-security-trust-from-senior-counsel-of-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-currency-2/#comment-17683 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:07:02 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=16693#comment-17683 In reply to LVLawman.

I disagree somewhat. One, I don’t think banks in foreclosure cases are going to admit they table funded the loan. And two, I think the rocket docket judges are more likely to claim federal exemption without figuring out the letter’s guidance because it does not help them rule in favor of the banks.

]]> By: LVLawman https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/no-federal-preemption-by-a-trustee-of-a-mortgage-backed-security-trust-from-senior-counsel-of-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-currency-2/#comment-17603 Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:21:05 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=16693#comment-17603 However, where a national bank did “table funding” for mortgage brokers (mortgage accumulators) there is a colorable claim that the banks, along the line, had a stake in the mortgage.

Similarly, I am waiting for some bank attorney to argue “preemption” where there are pending “put back” suits involving the specific mortgage. I have no faith that the Honorable members of the local judiciaries can, or wish, to parse this nonsense out and would seek any excuse to advance their rocket dockets without having to think or learn.

]]> By: James M https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/no-federal-preemption-by-a-trustee-of-a-mortgage-backed-security-trust-from-senior-counsel-of-the-office-of-the-comptroller-of-the-currency-2/#comment-17571 Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:22:07 +0000 https://4closurefraud.org/?p=16693#comment-17571 Funny, that’s just what I said in a comment to the prior posting.

https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/10/daily-finance-big-banks-tell-n-j-courts-to-stop-bugging-them-about-foreclosure-documents/#comment-17569

]]>