<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Guest Post &#124; Ibanez – Denying the Antecedent, Suppressing the Evidence and one big fat Red Herring	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/12/guest-post-ibanez-denying-the-antecedent-suppressing-the-evidence-and-one-big-fat-red-herring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/12/guest-post-ibanez-denying-the-antecedent-suppressing-the-evidence-and-one-big-fat-red-herring/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 16:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: indio007		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/01/12/guest-post-ibanez-denying-the-antecedent-suppressing-the-evidence-and-one-big-fat-red-herring/#comment-17771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indio007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=16785#comment-17771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In regard to...

&quot;&quot;Tom Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum, an industry lobbying group, said in a statement that the SJC’s decision, holds that “assignments of mortgage can be executed in blank, as long as a complete chain of transfers can be shown through the applicable deal documents.”&quot;&quot;

This statement is an outright LIE. It doesn&#039;t need to be explored

I can&#039;t even believe this guy would so shamelessly lie quite honestly. Whatever credibility ASF had is gone completely.

This is directly from the ruling. It&#039;s very unambiguous THERE CAN BE NO ASSIGNMENT IN BLANK!


We have long held that a 
conveyance of real property, such as a mortgage, that does not 
name the assignee conveys nothing and is void; we do not 
regard an assignment of land in blank as giving legal title in land 
to the bearer of the assignment. See Flavin v. Morrissey, 327 
Mass. 217, 219 (1951); Macurda v. Fuller, 225 Mass. 341, 344 
(1916). See also G.L. c. 183, § 3. 


This isn&#039;t even a close call.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;Tom Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum, an industry lobbying group, said in a statement that the SJC’s decision, holds that “assignments of mortgage can be executed in blank, as long as a complete chain of transfers can be shown through the applicable deal documents.”&#8221;&#8221;</p>
<p>This statement is an outright LIE. It doesn&#8217;t need to be explored</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even believe this guy would so shamelessly lie quite honestly. Whatever credibility ASF had is gone completely.</p>
<p>This is directly from the ruling. It&#8217;s very unambiguous THERE CAN BE NO ASSIGNMENT IN BLANK!</p>
<p>We have long held that a<br />
conveyance of real property, such as a mortgage, that does not<br />
name the assignee conveys nothing and is void; we do not<br />
regard an assignment of land in blank as giving legal title in land<br />
to the bearer of the assignment. See Flavin v. Morrissey, 327<br />
Mass. 217, 219 (1951); Macurda v. Fuller, 225 Mass. 341, 344<br />
(1916). See also G.L. c. 183, § 3. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t even a close call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
