Comments on: Florida Bar Foreclosure CLE | “What to do when false affidavits have been filed in foreclosure cases”

By: Robert J. Strupp

Robert J. Strupp — Sun, 08 May 2011 16:37:40 +0000

This is very helpful to an artticle I am working on. My question is this: the attorney for the “lender: may not know for sure if “robo” or other document deficiencies actually occurred in prior cases, unless the attorney actualy reviews those files to look (checking files for “Linda Green” for example.) With all the evidence out there, is ithere a duty to review ALL completed files to determine if such dishonesty, fraud, etc has occurred? if so, how far back? This could involve MILLIONS of foreclosures.
I look forward to your thoughts.

By: Canuck Linda

Canuck Linda — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:38:48 +0000

I brought the fraud to the Court’s attention and was ignored. I had Judge Thompson in Lee County tell me that I didn’t have any due process rights that – if i became aware of a Court case, I was considered “served with process” on the day I became aware of the fraud. The Clerk made sure the “rocket docket” hearings were not recorded. The attorneys were allowed to be at the base of the Judge’s bench and Pro Se candidates weren’t even allowed into the regular hearing area – there was a microphone in the peanut gallery to use.

I reported to the Florida Bar the filing of a foreclosure case against me by an attorney without any notice of representation, default notice and no assignment signed until 7 weeks after the case was filed. The Bar created a “new” type of finding that is not listed as a type of result – they found “no harm or error by the member of the Bar, but then wrote a letter of advisement that the conduct was “less than professional”. It is all crooked. Only the Bar can discipline a lawyer, the Attorney Generals cannot charge them.

By: Catherine Mc Manus

Catherine Mc Manus — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:23:57 +0000

Speaking to the “In Camera”-private in Judges Chambers-Inspections of Materials
my Attorney filed a Motion to Compel-Aug 9th, again Aug 27, 2010-
then requested “in Camera Inspection of that Material denoted “Trade Secret”….
So in my case the answer must be DO NOTHING-(at least for the past 6 months)

By: John Anderson

John Anderson — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:52:31 +0000

I think they are not going to enforce the law against the banks ever! Not one prosecution against fraudsters signing phony assignments of mortgage, posing as bank vice presidents, signing for businesses that have been out of business for years. If it was a individual who proffered outright fraudulent documents to the court, they would be prosecuted and sent to jail.
This disregard for the equal rule of law is what starts and fuels revolution.

By: Danelle Hills

Danelle Hills — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:32:01 +0000

I surely hope the answer will NOT be the “perhaps nothing” done by the Court.

By: boots Aniel

boots Aniel — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:40:06 +0000

i think the problem are the debt collecting foreclosing attorney hired by third parties vendors who initiated this manufactured assignment of deed. it all started with bogus assignment of deed. reading the testimony of jeffrey stephan and other deposition the referral unit of loan servicer is responsible for all this mess. once this referral unit referred the foreclosure property to debt collector attorney and if the filed does not have proper assignment of deed, then the lawyer will create and manufactured the assignment of deed. and whatever info to search title online then these foreclosing attorney is responsible in naming the beneficiary on the assignment of deed.
then this attorneys will submit this to the loan servicer and have it executed and acknowledged by a notary hired by loan servicer or their notary department to do it without the person signing this in front of them. while the person executing the assignment is also signing the assignment of deed without personal knowledge. the robo-signers just relied on lawyers informations given to them. if homeowners like for example challenge this in bankruptcy court, then these lawyers will make a copy of deed of trust from the county recorder’s office where the property is located or from the title company and make a copy of your promissory notes and they will filed this as their exhibits on their motion for relief from stay. and when you dispute their standing that there is no endorsement on then promissory and no allonge on the deed of trust , then the next court hearing there magically & suddenly the copy of your deed has an allonge attached and your promissory note magically appear to have endorsement. so here you go these debt collectors lawyers have the standing to ask the relief. these lawyers are habitual and serial documents fraudster. this is their living to sustain their business. in my case i found out that the lawyers got around $ 40, 000.00 attorneys fees for foreclosing my property for just filing fraudulent and false evidence and to lied on their motion. easy money for these scumbag to earn a living. i wish our government will take criminal actions against these lawyers with license to commit fraud upon the court and upon the homeowners. i’m here in ca, i’m still fighting these fraudster in the court. pls read jeffrey stephan testimony and brian bly. all those information is like ” holy grail” LAW FIRMS THAT IS FORECLOSING ATTORNEY ARE DEBT COLLECTORS.

By: nm

nm — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:19:02 +0000

In reply to Leo II.

Leo II,
That’s a very insightful story. Carlo Gambino, the boss of the bosses of New York’s 5 mafia families was said to have never uttered words like “murder” that snitch or “kill” the rat or “whack” that SOB. He just gave a nod. The banks may be smarter than I thought. For them, their outside law firms are just a dispensable component, like one expense item of the costs of doing their business.

By: lisamarie

lisamarie — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:42:27 +0000

I dont know how without the court clerks assist a lawfirm can file bogus crap into a court file, but mine is loaded with BS. Including two false statements. Re; FILED ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE, and its not there. Only the statement. Same goes for the shoddy corporate assignment. How can somebody go down to the court house and just file anything they want to?

By: allisun

allisun — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:11:25 +0000

In this case perhaps the judges need to meet with plaintiffs attorneys and assist in recreating fabricated documents so that the PLAINTIFFS ARE PROTECTED from rabid homeowners trying to stay in their homes.
These courts cannot be accused of weighing any issues in the direction of homeowners as they are directed to do by law…the political climate will not stand for it…

By: Leo II

Leo II — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:45:44 +0000

A former State’s Deputy Attorney General now in private practice said to me during a conversation that he is strict with his clients regarding their testimony: “don’t ever lie in court”, he said, “that’s what you pay your lawyer to do.” I nearly vomited.