Bryan Bly and Crystal Moore are robo signer.and citigroup…never own the loans from Ameriquest.. if you google Citigroup only takes the servicing rights not the loans.. you will find alot of info.. I also have a court case where citi says they never had the loans from Ameriquest… everything from Ameriquest… all loans are gone.. no one has the MORTGAGE OR NOTE.. and DBNTC.. I have a letter stating the do not have the loans from Ameriquest.. citigroup .. did the assignment from Nationwider title clearing.. it is fraud.. I have alot of info… to help..

I have the same on my deed of title.. first what is the dates remember citi closed there doors, in 2008 if the assiment was later then 2008 it MAYBE FRAUD.. ASK a lawyer
also.. Citi did not have note.. CITI only had servicing RIGHTS… google… citi and read all the information…. more and likely if you LOAN HAS CHANGED HANDS.. it was only the servicing
rights not the paper work or the mortage.. note…
do a quiettitle and Tresspass to try a lawyer can ask for Attorney fee to be paid.. also
have the lawyer to a action of slander of title and delacarton of judgement act.. and consumer protection,, there are many more…
..what needs to be done is the books need to be seen where has your money gone
all the banks need to bring in there books there will be two.. the one they show your
records of paying and the off set book and all the books of all the investors
of your sec note… all of them including the books of your investor or you server
…. ha ha ha .. can they do it…………….. MORE AND LIKELY NO..
WHY.. money in the sec is tax free.. so where is the money….
hummmmmm maybe money laundering…….. as most of the banks have now been found
guilty of mortage fraud and money laundering……… yes sir.. oh yep

I have the same on my title deed.. exactly as you do John… it is fraud.. anything signed by these robo signers.. first nether Crystal or Bly have ever been vice pres of any bank or leanding compay or corp.. all they did is sign as vice pres or sec. or or.. they word for nationwide title clearing… robo singing on a deed,,is a clouded title.. you will need an Attorney .. its should be easire now that they have given depo.. and Duetsche bank has been found guilty of mortage fraud and money laundering.. google it .. you will find the info..

The name and commission end date has even been searched by the TX SOS. The stamp used by the Litton ‘notary’ is bogus.

Wow, I googled both names and got a deposition of her where she freely admits falsifying all documents and him notorizing them knowing they were false.

I see now where they are still doing the same work, but are now OK to do it under the law.
All they got was a slap on the wrist. I thought they would all do time.

How can that help me now. Mine were signed falsely two days before her deposition.

What can my lawyer do with this? How have others used this to the homeowners advantage if discovered after foreclosure?

Thanks for the help!!!
John

John,

I can not BELIEVE someone has not heard of Brian J Bly after he was so completely ‘outed’ in the media?

Also, Crystal Moore is on the list of well-known robo-signers.

Have you tried just a ‘google’ of “Brian Bly”?

How about Brian J. Bly as Notary Public from Florida?

These did this for Deutsche Bank. Are they ligetimate or robo signers?

Litton filed the POC on behalf of Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for a particular REMIC’c certificate-holders.

I don’t know why Litton has not gotten smeared for their robo-signing. They are creating false documents just like the others have been ‘busted for’ and are even employing LPS, McCalla-Rhymer and the rest of the LPS set of fraudsters.

Search on “Melissa Bell” as a notary. Look up “Marti Noriega” as a signer. “M Bell” should not be signed using the “Melissa Bell” stamp per TX rules.The only valid signature is the same spelling as the stamp.

Don’t worry, there are quite a few additional counts that will be in the adversarial motion and I’m sure the robo signatures will be included. But we shall see IF the adversarial even needs to be filed. Since the Proof of Claim has been botched and they transferred the loan again AFTER filing the POC, this claim by the Banksters may get stomped on by the BK Trustee.

If the case is goes forward, the documents will show that Litton is generating self-serving documents in favor of the entity that they are supposedly employed by. Of course they attempt to use MERS but courts have already ‘awakened’ to the fact that the people signing the assignments are doing so in their own favor, simply using MERS to disguise it.

Use of MERS to sign as the nominee for a defunct entity has a problem itself: The ‘nominee’ role should not provide MERS with greater powers than the original entity now has. That original entity is defunct. It was a TRADE NAME at best. The original TRADE NAME did not even have the rights to have made the loan, yet the TRADE NAME was the only one supplied as the supposed ‘LENDER’ on the original loan docs.