Comments on: Way To Go Idaho | Judge Rules Lending Company (MERS) didn’t Follow Proper Steps to Obtain Couple’s Home

By: John peter

John peter — Tue, 10 May 2011 06:53:32 +0000

Apparently all these case wins are still missing the core of the issue. Even thought the lien was NOT recorded against title, in bad faith the trustee still failed to disclose the origin of the funds the alleged lender provided to the alleged borrower. The case also failed to mention the lender received Payment in full on the note, 91 days after the note was signed. See FASB report 140
ALL Lenders always use a 1099 OID form to collect on each note and then they collect on the note a second time using an IRS form 1099A. Lets start litigating the core of the issue – The Bank loaned NO ASSETS of their own. NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO FORECLOSE.

By: smylyface02

smylyface02 — Mon, 09 May 2011 23:17:40 +0000

i need an attorney who can litigate my lender. i believe nobody wants to sue the banks for fraud foreclosure.
if anyone can suggest a good real estate litigation attorney, please let me know. thank you

smylyface02

By: Pamela

Pamela — Mon, 09 May 2011 21:37:50 +0000

Also that it wasn’t robo signed in Pinnella”s county Florida in stead of the state that both they and the property reside in!!

By: AliceN.Wunderland

AliceN.Wunderland — Mon, 09 May 2011 19:25:14 +0000

Where can I get one of those signs.

By: TheHutMaster

TheHutMaster — Mon, 09 May 2011 18:24:41 +0000

In Florida, I see case dismissed, and then 90 days later the Mills foreclose again.

I think the Bansters think that since the case is dismissed, the Homeowner will not have the mony to retain a Lawter for the second forthcoming suit.

“Fight The Good Fight”

By: coolpillow

coolpillow — Mon, 09 May 2011 18:22:36 +0000

They should also see if there was an “Assignment of Mortgage” by MERS and make sure that the docs weren’t robo-signed (like mine were) and that the Notary’s Signature was Fraudulant (as mine was).