Comments on: IN RE PHILLIPS, US Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama | AURORA LOAN SERVICES Motion to Dismiss GRANTED, Except for Fraud on the Court

By: Mad as hell in Maryland

Mad as hell in Maryland — Wed, 11 May 2011 02:40:32 +0000

I thought FRAUD had no statue, and one only needed to ‘bring it up’ when first learned of?

By: Readdocs

Readdocs — Tue, 10 May 2011 21:13:55 +0000

Upfront, who owns the note, who has possession of the note. Who has the deed of trust? Demand they
be presented in court before the judge to be physically examined and verified they are not copies and they are not forgeries. This is the key to every suit brought before the courts as to whether there is any advantage
in fighting the opponents in court.

By: Lit Gant

Lit Gant — Tue, 10 May 2011 18:44:05 +0000

Well, the banks win again. And they will also prevail on the fraud on the court count. They will buy the judge off out of chambers. That is the way they always do it.

By: Jay Spencer

Jay Spencer — Tue, 10 May 2011 18:41:04 +0000

Not challenging the legitimacy of the mortgage and note at the beginning of legal proceedings, sayeth the judge, was enough to let the banksters off the hook, and for the plaintiffs to lose their house. Ye have been warnst!