Going a step further, ReconTrust was Countrywide’s company, not BofA’s. Given that BofA claimed no successor liability for Countrywide, in CA court, BofA should prove that they are a successor in interest to ReconTrust, before even addressing the issue.

I cannot remember the lady’s name at this time but sometimes around 2004 she was head of the OCC and tried everything in her tool box to take all state powers away and let federal rules dominate any court actions, but still allow them to screw the states’ citizens with out of control credit card interest. Banks like Chase and Bank of Am were calling their headquarters states like South Dakota and Delaware in their metal – brick wall fronted buildings, while operating out of skyscrapers in California and New York????????????

Fraud should be dealt with wherever it is found, be it state or federal and allow for now escape hatches via use of courtroom symathics.

The preceeding court venue argument should be null and void because via the use of MERS or any type of trustee BS would mean that the mortgage and promissory note were definitely separated making them unstable and unenforcable according to the US SUPREME COURTS DECISION………

I pray for the day when the Fed Res, Bank of America, Chase Manhattan and Wells Fargo are conviced of their mass fraud and then no longer exist………TOO BIG TO FAIL — BS —- SO BIG THAT THEY GET CONGRESS TO DO WHAT THEY WANT DONE FOR THEM WHETHER DIRECTLY OR BY USING THEIR OWNERS THE FOREIGN OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE TO BS CONGRESS FOR THEM………It’s all the same gang/ cartel of banksters from Europe who has controlled our economy and ruined our banking system since 1913…….

Ok …. You tell me where the hell in AZ is there a component F’n Lawyer? I have spent a small fortune just to talk with a lawyer only to find out, I know more then he did. (thank you Internet and YouTube) I do even have Countrywide on my Deed listed and the original lender had their license pulled for fraudulent practice. They don’t even exist anymore. I personally have not paid my mortgage in over 2 years and threats from the Banksters of America keep coming yet they don’t dare to foreclose on me. So looking for a Lawyer is so F’n tiring.

Thrift Looting, Time ALL of the foreign multinationals posing as American institutions WHO ROBBED AMERICA IN THE BIGGEST PONZI SCHEME SWINDLE AND HEIST in history, are sent packing. Bank of America, Chase, Wells Fargo, FANNIE/FREDDIE, THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, WALL STREET, THE NYSE/EURONEXT, THE CME GROUP, ALL foreign owned and operated. THEY ALSO STOLE THE BAILOUT MONEY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEY ARE_ FOREIGNERS_ AND WE PAID FOR THEIR PONZI SCHEME CRIME SPREE and we still are. THEY ARE WHO HAVE _NO RIGHTS_ HERE IN AMERICA UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. THEY ARE ALL D/B/A AS AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS, THEY ARE LIARS, THEY ARE FOREIGN INSTITUTIONS. THEY CREATE IMMENSE WEALTH FOR THEMSELVES AND DEBT AND IMPOVERISHMENT FOR THE REST OF HUMANITY. DEATH TO THE FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I meant to say Utah in place of AZ.

You AZ homeowners need to dig out your Deed and your Note to see if you have a valid LENDER named on the face of the documents.

Some of the firms involved initially DID exist but then there are the ones that NEVER did exist. That means those loans that specify “America’s Wholesale Lender – A Corporation” and also specify the corporation to be a NEW YORK corporation, need to hire a competent attorney and inform him that not only did the company not exist when the loan was originated, there can be NO WAY that AZ or any other state registered ‘AWL’ as a business that could do business in the state, nor world they have been registered as a licensed LENDER in any state.

The four corners of you loan does not identify your LENDER.

What has been occurring is that CountryWide has been claiming that they could register a “D/B/A” with the various states. IF your loan cites ‘CountryWide D/B/A America’s Wholesale Lender” on it’s face, then CountryWide can use the D/B/A.

For the loans that do NOT have any such designation and which clearly state that the LENDER is a NEW YORK CORPORATION that is “America’s Wholesale Lender”, they are just full of it and have as yet not had a recent major case hallmark that point.

If they were able to have used a D/B/A to ‘fix’ the problem with these “AWL CORP” loans, then CountryWide would not have LOST the Pagano and the Silverstein cases where appeals courts ultimately determined that CountryWide had issued the mortgages in nothing more that a TRADE NAME and tried to foreclose in that tradename. CountryWide learned they could not do so. So their newer claim is that they have the “D/B/A’.

Well, now if they could have used that “D/B/A” to cure those TRADE NAME loans at the time of the two prior decisions, they would have. These loans today with the “America’s Wholesale Lender Corporation” LENDER are no different than the loans involved in the Pagano and the Silverstein cases. The only difference is that they are managing to fool attorneys or people have not found an attorney who is up to the argument.

IF you research the NY state filings, you will find a company by that name incorporated on 12/16/2008. The principal person is a CANADIAN apparently. Also note that by the time that later company was incorporated, CountryWide had been taken over by Bank AmeriFRAUD. The ‘AWL Inc” that DOES exist in NY State boxes the fraudsters in a bit. It is a company that clearly was first registered TOO LATE. But it takes the NY corporate registration slot away from any other manipulation to make it appear that the company did exist at the correct time. For example, it keeps the fraudsters from simply trying to confuse people with a rename of some other NY corporation to fit the name shown on these loans.

By not having the named LENDER in existence at any time, these loans were a fraud from the beginning. Assignments are being bluffed, using MERS.

MERS is being used to sign as the NOMINEE for a corporation that NEVER EXISTED.

When are people going to notice that these loans should NEVER have even have gotten a MIN number from MERS? Ameica’s Wholesale Lender never had a membership in MERS.

MERS can NOT assign for a company that does not exist, yet Litton has tried to assert that very ability with the assignment of my loan.

A loan that identifies a fraudulent name of the LENDER should not be allowed to be in any of the investment trusts.

I am wondering how soon the SEC is going to start receiving complaints of various CWABS, CWALTS, CWMBS, etc., that need to have loans disgorged or ejected (I’m not sure which term is correct).

I am not an attorney but Neil Garfield has posted information on his Living Lies website that points out the AWL Corp loans as ‘wild’ loans.