<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dylan Ratigan &#124; Fraudclosure Whistleblowers Speak Out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: AliceN.Wunderland		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AliceN.Wunderland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351&quot;&gt;Get Real&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;if you provided funds up front to someone to purchase an object and then asked them to pledge the object as collateral for guarantee you would pay them back, and then they stopped paying you or refused to pay you as they had agreed to do, would you not want your collateral back that they pledged to you?? &quot;    Yes, that is why the Investors of the MBS are suing the banks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351">Get Real</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;if you provided funds up front to someone to purchase an object and then asked them to pledge the object as collateral for guarantee you would pay them back, and then they stopped paying you or refused to pay you as they had agreed to do, would you not want your collateral back that they pledged to you?? &#8221;    Yes, that is why the Investors of the MBS are suing the banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pamelag		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pamelag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 17:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351&quot;&gt;Get Real&lt;/a&gt;.

i paid my mortgage til they forced homeowners ins that i already had in place (proved it to them, they paid out of escrow) they applied all my payment to BALBOA ins escrow and filed foreclosure. i was never in default. the fn judge covered his ears. i am not the only one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351">Get Real</a>.</p>
<p>i paid my mortgage til they forced homeowners ins that i already had in place (proved it to them, they paid out of escrow) they applied all my payment to BALBOA ins escrow and filed foreclosure. i was never in default. the fn judge covered his ears. i am not the only one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R Foreman		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Foreman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 10:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397&quot;&gt;Wakeup.&lt;/a&gt;.

Not only that, but the allegedly &#039;damaged&#039; banks/servicers don&#039;t actually lose any money on a default since they get paid off with credit default insurance (CDS). The borrower should get a free home once the bank is made whole by the CDS payoff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397">Wakeup.</a>.</p>
<p>Not only that, but the allegedly &#8216;damaged&#8217; banks/servicers don&#8217;t actually lose any money on a default since they get paid off with credit default insurance (CDS). The borrower should get a free home once the bank is made whole by the CDS payoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hell NO - No More Bail-Outs or FALSE Modification Programs (Ahem or A-hamp)		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hell NO - No More Bail-Outs or FALSE Modification Programs (Ahem or A-hamp)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 07:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a piece of evidence that should be used to lift the bar license of one of Litton&#039;s in-house attorney&#039;s. Debra Lyman is supposed to be the person signing the assignment document. 

Litton is the supposed servicer for supposedly BNY-Mellon.

Yet after Litton was already the servicer and BNY-Mellon was already the supposed Trustee Litton was working for, Debra Lyman signed the concocted assignment in favor of that very same BNY-Mellon Trustee. This document was even produced far after the foreclosure had been initiated by Litton, and in fact, was generated even after a Proof of Claim had been entered into the Bankruptcy case that I filed.

So the assignment was produced specifically to match up with the Proof of Claim they had already filed. I contend that is FRAUD.

Additionally, that assignment document ATTEMPTS to assign even the NOTE! MERS is not on the original note so CA courts are already ruling such assignments are void regarding the NOTE.

This bogus assignment attempts to assign a supposedly defaulted mortgage into a Trust. That is another no-no.

It assigns it into a trust that closed 5 years ago.That is another no-no.

MERS can not assign as NOMINEE of a corporation that does not now exist. In fact, the lender named on the original loan documents NEVER has existed. That is just another little ole Litton no-no.

Oh, yeah, and this is one of those trusts with a PSA that directs that multi-step chain of assignments, not this single-step, impossible &#039;chain&#039; from a company that never existed into a trust that closed years ago!

Infact, even the name of the Trustee has changed over the ensuing years. The PSA specifies the Trustee is BNY. Now after 2005, BNY merged with Mellon, forming BNY-Mellon. The Litton assignment assigns to the f/k/a trustee. 

Additionally, if the assignments had even been performed at the proper time, there would not have been any Litton involvement in the generation of the fabrications. The initial servicer was CountryWide. Litton only became the servicer AFTER the supposed default occurred.

Because the NOTE and DEED both name a fictional LENDER, fabrications were inevitable. IF the mortgage was ever paid off, someone would have had to sign for that fictional company on the satisfaction of mortgage. Either that or generate the false assignment to another company that would have signed for the satisfaction of mortgage. In that case, there is no guarantee that they would not have also falsely assigned the debt to other company simultaneously that did NOT issue a satisfaction of mortgage. As long as they are signing false documents, what is to stop them from creating a satisfaction at the same time they produce a non-paid-off assignment?

With the supposed default, they had to generate the fabricated assignment because they can not foreclose in the name of a TRADENAME. See Pagano v America&#039;s Wholesale Lender. See also Silverstein v America&#039;s Wholesale Lender.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a piece of evidence that should be used to lift the bar license of one of Litton&#8217;s in-house attorney&#8217;s. Debra Lyman is supposed to be the person signing the assignment document. </p>
<p>Litton is the supposed servicer for supposedly BNY-Mellon.</p>
<p>Yet after Litton was already the servicer and BNY-Mellon was already the supposed Trustee Litton was working for, Debra Lyman signed the concocted assignment in favor of that very same BNY-Mellon Trustee. This document was even produced far after the foreclosure had been initiated by Litton, and in fact, was generated even after a Proof of Claim had been entered into the Bankruptcy case that I filed.</p>
<p>So the assignment was produced specifically to match up with the Proof of Claim they had already filed. I contend that is FRAUD.</p>
<p>Additionally, that assignment document ATTEMPTS to assign even the NOTE! MERS is not on the original note so CA courts are already ruling such assignments are void regarding the NOTE.</p>
<p>This bogus assignment attempts to assign a supposedly defaulted mortgage into a Trust. That is another no-no.</p>
<p>It assigns it into a trust that closed 5 years ago.That is another no-no.</p>
<p>MERS can not assign as NOMINEE of a corporation that does not now exist. In fact, the lender named on the original loan documents NEVER has existed. That is just another little ole Litton no-no.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, and this is one of those trusts with a PSA that directs that multi-step chain of assignments, not this single-step, impossible &#8216;chain&#8217; from a company that never existed into a trust that closed years ago!</p>
<p>Infact, even the name of the Trustee has changed over the ensuing years. The PSA specifies the Trustee is BNY. Now after 2005, BNY merged with Mellon, forming BNY-Mellon. The Litton assignment assigns to the f/k/a trustee. </p>
<p>Additionally, if the assignments had even been performed at the proper time, there would not have been any Litton involvement in the generation of the fabrications. The initial servicer was CountryWide. Litton only became the servicer AFTER the supposed default occurred.</p>
<p>Because the NOTE and DEED both name a fictional LENDER, fabrications were inevitable. IF the mortgage was ever paid off, someone would have had to sign for that fictional company on the satisfaction of mortgage. Either that or generate the false assignment to another company that would have signed for the satisfaction of mortgage. In that case, there is no guarantee that they would not have also falsely assigned the debt to other company simultaneously that did NOT issue a satisfaction of mortgage. As long as they are signing false documents, what is to stop them from creating a satisfaction at the same time they produce a non-paid-off assignment?</p>
<p>With the supposed default, they had to generate the fabricated assignment because they can not foreclose in the name of a TRADENAME. See Pagano v America&#8217;s Wholesale Lender. See also Silverstein v America&#8217;s Wholesale Lender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: l vent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[l vent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 02:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397&quot;&gt;Wakeup.&lt;/a&gt;.

Get Real,  We were all paying our bills on time for the last 25+ years until the ILLUMINATI INTENTIONALLY CRASHED THE STOCK MARKET IN 2008.  GO...TO...YOU...TUBE....AND....SEARCH...FOR,,,,,THE VIDEO ENTITLED.............CNBC THE ILLUMINATI CRASHES THE STOCK MARKET.   THEN YOU WILL ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTION.   IT IS CALLED TOO MUCH POWER IN THE HANDS OF A FEW GIANT FOREIGN OWNED AND OPERATED MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS A/K/A AND OLIGARCHY.......THAT WILL NOT STAND IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS.  GOD BLESS AMERICA......OUR HOMES ARE PAID FOR FREE AND CLEAR BECA-- USE OF THEIR PONZI SCHEME SWINDLE AND HEIST, THE PROOF IS IN THE ORIGINATION AND ON TITLE.....................WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAN ON NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE DEFAULTS AND TAX REVOLTS AND DECLARING OUR NATIONAL SOVERIEGNTY FROM THE FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   FREEDOM WILL REIGN SUPREME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397">Wakeup.</a>.</p>
<p>Get Real,  We were all paying our bills on time for the last 25+ years until the ILLUMINATI INTENTIONALLY CRASHED THE STOCK MARKET IN 2008.  GO&#8230;TO&#8230;YOU&#8230;TUBE&#8230;.AND&#8230;.SEARCH&#8230;FOR,,,,,THE VIDEO ENTITLED&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.CNBC THE ILLUMINATI CRASHES THE STOCK MARKET.   THEN YOU WILL ANSWER YOUR OWN QUESTION.   IT IS CALLED TOO MUCH POWER IN THE HANDS OF A FEW GIANT FOREIGN OWNED AND OPERATED MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS A/K/A AND OLIGARCHY&#8230;&#8230;.THAT WILL NOT STAND IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS.  GOD BLESS AMERICA&#8230;&#8230;OUR HOMES ARE PAID FOR FREE AND CLEAR BECA&#8211; USE OF THEIR PONZI SCHEME SWINDLE AND HEIST, THE PROOF IS IN THE ORIGINATION AND ON TITLE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAN ON NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE DEFAULTS AND TAX REVOLTS AND DECLARING OUR NATIONAL SOVERIEGNTY FROM THE FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   FREEDOM WILL REIGN SUPREME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Get Real		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Get Real]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397&quot;&gt;Wakeup.&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Wakeup, why would anyone buy a car before test driving it, hence it would have to have an engine to do so...whos stuid now???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397">Wakeup.</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Wakeup, why would anyone buy a car before test driving it, hence it would have to have an engine to do so&#8230;whos stuid now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wakeup.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wakeup.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 22:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351&quot;&gt;Get Real&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey GET REAL...you&#039;re pretty sharp cookie. What if you bought a new car, signed the note, agreed to make payments, and the car didn&#039;t have an engine! Would you keep paying? if you say yes, you&#039;re a liar. Wake up stupid!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351">Get Real</a>.</p>
<p>Hey GET REAL&#8230;you&#8217;re pretty sharp cookie. What if you bought a new car, signed the note, agreed to make payments, and the car didn&#8217;t have an engine! Would you keep paying? if you say yes, you&#8217;re a liar. Wake up stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrs Doutfire		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrs Doutfire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 20:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quoting Binkey:,   (All of sudden my records in the Federal Courts have been sealed without my knowledge, if there is no problem, why have the records been sealed. I was told that was only in the case of my statements to the courts and they are not open for public view. I have never heard of this unless I made that request to the courts, and paid to have it sealed….)

Kinda makes you go Hmmmmm. FRAUD thats all it is and the Banks dont want the public to know and I think like everyone else here that it goes A WHOLE  lot depper than what we really know.........
Keep up the great work everyone!!!!!
The more I dig in my own case, the more fraud I find....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting Binkey:,   (All of sudden my records in the Federal Courts have been sealed without my knowledge, if there is no problem, why have the records been sealed. I was told that was only in the case of my statements to the courts and they are not open for public view. I have never heard of this unless I made that request to the courts, and paid to have it sealed….)</p>
<p>Kinda makes you go Hmmmmm. FRAUD thats all it is and the Banks dont want the public to know and I think like everyone else here that it goes A WHOLE  lot depper than what we really know&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Keep up the great work everyone!!!!!<br />
The more I dig in my own case, the more fraud I find&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Get Real		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Get Real]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By a show of hands how many writers to this or any other blog have had some personal financial difficulty, such as job loss, medical bills etc that have caused you to stop paying your mortgage because you simply did not have the money?? Silly question I know, now heres another, AND if those hardships had not come would you all still be paying your mortgage, you sure would...and would you have all the time in the world to continually gripe about who is being fraudulent to you? No you would not!! The bottom line is anyone who purchased a property and did not have 100% of their own funds at closing needed the assistance of another party to provide the funds which allowed the buyer to purchase that property, move in and raise a family, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, all of us signed documents pledging the asset (the home) as collateral that could be taken away if we stopped paying for it.  And if you recall my first question and answered yes then what are you whining about? We all agreed to do certain things and we have failed, yet we want to sit back and point fingers as to who exactly holds the note to our properties and because it cannot be proven we are entitled to something for nothing, BULL SHIT, We owe the money to someone and that someone will come forward to collect, may not be today may not be tomorrow but we will all have to pay or we will have to get out...One final question, if you provided funds up front to someone to purchase an object and then asked them to pledge the object as collateral for guarantee you would pay them back, and then they stopped paying you or refused to pay you as they had agreed to do, would you not want your collateral back that they pledged to you?? Caution if you say no you are a liar!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a show of hands how many writers to this or any other blog have had some personal financial difficulty, such as job loss, medical bills etc that have caused you to stop paying your mortgage because you simply did not have the money?? Silly question I know, now heres another, AND if those hardships had not come would you all still be paying your mortgage, you sure would&#8230;and would you have all the time in the world to continually gripe about who is being fraudulent to you? No you would not!! The bottom line is anyone who purchased a property and did not have 100% of their own funds at closing needed the assistance of another party to provide the funds which allowed the buyer to purchase that property, move in and raise a family, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, all of us signed documents pledging the asset (the home) as collateral that could be taken away if we stopped paying for it.  And if you recall my first question and answered yes then what are you whining about? We all agreed to do certain things and we have failed, yet we want to sit back and point fingers as to who exactly holds the note to our properties and because it cannot be proven we are entitled to something for nothing, BULL SHIT, We owe the money to someone and that someone will come forward to collect, may not be today may not be tomorrow but we will all have to pay or we will have to get out&#8230;One final question, if you provided funds up front to someone to purchase an object and then asked them to pledge the object as collateral for guarantee you would pay them back, and then they stopped paying you or refused to pay you as they had agreed to do, would you not want your collateral back that they pledged to you?? Caution if you say no you are a liar!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: l vent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/14/dylan-ratigan-fraudclosure-whistleblowers-speak-out/#comment-32306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[l vent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=24751#comment-32306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What they want is to steal homes they don&#039;t own, collect all the money they can by fraudclosing and turn America into a nation of renters. THEY DO NOT OWN OUR HOMES AND EITHER DO THE TRUSTS. We own our homes free and clear because of the GIANT PONZI SCHEME.
 THE BANKSTERS NEVER ASSIGNED THE LOANS TO THE TRUSTS. ESSENTIALLY NONE OF THEM....EVER....ASSIGNED....THE......LOANS....TO.....THE....TRUSTS. 
 AS MAX GARDNER POINTED OUT SPEAKING TO SOME OF HIS FELLOW ATTORNEYS ABOUT THIS ISSUE, ,  IF ANYONE EVER FINDS A DEAL WHERE THE NOTE WAS CORRECTLY ENDORSED TO THE TRUST, HE OR SHE SHOULD BRONZE IT AND HANG IT ON THEIR WALL. 
THEREFORE, THIS MEANS THEY CAN NOT FORECLOSE.
. THIS IS WHY WE HAVE FORECLOSUREGATE .  
THIS IS THE TRUTH THAT NEEDS TO GET OUT THERE. 

DID YOU HEAR THAT WASHINGTON??????????????????????????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they want is to steal homes they don&#8217;t own, collect all the money they can by fraudclosing and turn America into a nation of renters. THEY DO NOT OWN OUR HOMES AND EITHER DO THE TRUSTS. We own our homes free and clear because of the GIANT PONZI SCHEME.<br />
 THE BANKSTERS NEVER ASSIGNED THE LOANS TO THE TRUSTS. ESSENTIALLY NONE OF THEM&#8230;.EVER&#8230;.ASSIGNED&#8230;.THE&#8230;&#8230;LOANS&#8230;.TO&#8230;..THE&#8230;.TRUSTS.<br />
 AS MAX GARDNER POINTED OUT SPEAKING TO SOME OF HIS FELLOW ATTORNEYS ABOUT THIS ISSUE, ,  IF ANYONE EVER FINDS A DEAL WHERE THE NOTE WAS CORRECTLY ENDORSED TO THE TRUST, HE OR SHE SHOULD BRONZE IT AND HANG IT ON THEIR WALL.<br />
THEREFORE, THIS MEANS THEY CAN NOT FORECLOSE.<br />
. THIS IS WHY WE HAVE FORECLOSUREGATE .<br />
THIS IS THE TRUTH THAT NEEDS TO GET OUT THERE. </p>
<p>DID YOU HEAR THAT WASHINGTON??????????????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
