<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MERS FAIL &#124; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc v. Tammy Church	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 01:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Robert		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=25488#comment-34286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34285&quot;&gt;Michael-Lynn&lt;/a&gt;.

Lets hope Churches attorneys fix that little oversight where the judge refers to MERS as a lender or mortgagee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34285">Michael-Lynn</a>.</p>
<p>Lets hope Churches attorneys fix that little oversight where the judge refers to MERS as a lender or mortgagee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael-Lynn		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael-Lynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=25488#comment-34285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These idiot judges also mistate that MERS is the lender or mortgagee instead of the fact that MERS has not standing to be a Plaintiff as MERS has no interest in the property, mortgage or note as determined in Indiana and else where the past several months.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These idiot judges also mistate that MERS is the lender or mortgagee instead of the fact that MERS has not standing to be a Plaintiff as MERS has no interest in the property, mortgage or note as determined in Indiana and else where the past several months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Robert		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=25488#comment-34178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[- the question I have on this one is did the IRS file a Lien or a “Notice of Tax Lien”, my suspicion is they filed a Notice of Tax Lien whereby the IRS did not judicially obtain a proper Lien, which is why they file a Notice of Tax Lien. The County Clerks are so frightened by the big bad IRS that they allow the IRS to confiscate (steal) the property knowing that the IRS didn’t follow state and federal laws ignoring and by passing any judicial process and allowed them to move forward with a “Notice of Tax Lien”. Any Sheriff/Clerk who participates in confiscating based on a Notice of Tax Lien is a coward and a thief. 

The other loud and clear message here is own nothing and control everything. There is absolutely no reason to ever own anything in the US unless of course you want the IRS or some scum sucking attorney to sue you and try and take if from you. You can dam well bet that the Rothschild’s and the Rockefeller’s don’t own and dam thing, at least their name is not attached, however, they control everything.

Note to self, put a first in time lien on anything I own, period, and make sure my name is not attached to that lien and if possible make sure my name is not attached to the property. A Federal Judge told me a long time ago, (and I quote), “I can’t take what I can’t find”.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211; the question I have on this one is did the IRS file a Lien or a “Notice of Tax Lien”, my suspicion is they filed a Notice of Tax Lien whereby the IRS did not judicially obtain a proper Lien, which is why they file a Notice of Tax Lien. The County Clerks are so frightened by the big bad IRS that they allow the IRS to confiscate (steal) the property knowing that the IRS didn’t follow state and federal laws ignoring and by passing any judicial process and allowed them to move forward with a “Notice of Tax Lien”. Any Sheriff/Clerk who participates in confiscating based on a Notice of Tax Lien is a coward and a thief. </p>
<p>The other loud and clear message here is own nothing and control everything. There is absolutely no reason to ever own anything in the US unless of course you want the IRS or some scum sucking attorney to sue you and try and take if from you. You can dam well bet that the Rothschild’s and the Rockefeller’s don’t own and dam thing, at least their name is not attached, however, they control everything.</p>
<p>Note to self, put a first in time lien on anything I own, period, and make sure my name is not attached to that lien and if possible make sure my name is not attached to the property. A Federal Judge told me a long time ago, (and I quote), “I can’t take what I can’t find”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MAGGIe May		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MAGGIe May]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=25488#comment-34177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34175&quot;&gt;housemanrob&lt;/a&gt;.

IM CLUELESS  U TELL ME!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34175">housemanrob</a>.</p>
<p>IM CLUELESS  U TELL ME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: housemanrob		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/05/24/mers-fail-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-v-tammy-church/#comment-34175</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[housemanrob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 13:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=25488#comment-34175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So it ends up at the IRS and then immediately to the fed bank. Then the banksters borrow it for free! What am I missing here? Is there any difference?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it ends up at the IRS and then immediately to the fed bank. Then the banksters borrow it for free! What am I missing here? Is there any difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
