<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: KABOOM &#124; HENDRICKS v. U.S. BANK, BofA &#8211; MI Court Destroys MERS Finds &#8220;MERS Transferred Nothing&#8221; with Bonus Securitization FAIL	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard G. Chosid		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36227</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard G. Chosid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36027&quot;&gt;Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny&lt;/a&gt;.

We can hope that the apparent inconsistent portions of the findings and decision will be brought before a higher court. This show should not be over yet. I hope that Michigan lawyers upon learning of the publication of a notice of sale would start an action to clear title. Perhaps such an action would hold up the sale without the need to file bankruptcy and allow for a reasonable and proper judicial disposition. 

What ever happened to loan modifications as mandated in TARP in Michigan?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36027">Stupendous Man &#8211; Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny</a>.</p>
<p>We can hope that the apparent inconsistent portions of the findings and decision will be brought before a higher court. This show should not be over yet. I hope that Michigan lawyers upon learning of the publication of a notice of sale would start an action to clear title. Perhaps such an action would hold up the sale without the need to file bankruptcy and allow for a reasonable and proper judicial disposition. </p>
<p>What ever happened to loan modifications as mandated in TARP in Michigan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Molley		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry I am not a legal person, but have an interest in all this stuff.  How can Franklin own anything, did they not get paid in full.  Am I missing something here.  Surely if you have already been paid, you would not be entitled to foreclose as well ?  Also would the beneficiaries of the securitzation trust not have recourse to sue the trustees  ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I am not a legal person, but have an interest in all this stuff.  How can Franklin own anything, did they not get paid in full.  Am I missing something here.  Surely if you have already been paid, you would not be entitled to foreclose as well ?  Also would the beneficiaries of the securitzation trust not have recourse to sue the trustees  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Homer		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can an attorney please provide their input on the following:
-First Franklin is a defunct company.
-National City is a defunct company after being purchased by PNC on 10/24/08 (with TARP funding)
-The subject loan was sold and National City was paid in full prior to the sale to PNC.
-The sale of National City to PNC did not include this loan.

How can First Franklin own this loan?  It seems to me that we have a new conundrum - where the beneficial interest has been divided from the legal title of the note.  Any comments???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can an attorney please provide their input on the following:<br />
-First Franklin is a defunct company.<br />
-National City is a defunct company after being purchased by PNC on 10/24/08 (with TARP funding)<br />
-The subject loan was sold and National City was paid in full prior to the sale to PNC.<br />
-The sale of National City to PNC did not include this loan.</p>
<p>How can First Franklin own this loan?  It seems to me that we have a new conundrum &#8211; where the beneficial interest has been divided from the legal title of the note.  Any comments???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: l vent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[l vent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How could First Franklin be granted the foreclosure? There were obviously many laws broken here and no clean chain of title and then therefore this mortgage could NEVER, EVER be a secured debt. The debt has to be secured at the ORIGINATION. This foreclosure should be illegal. How is First Franklin  entitled to a judgement as a matter of law?  WHAT LAW DID THEY FOLLOW? They bought a bad debt is what they did.  The PSA cannot be complied with at this late date and one of these lenders broke the law and the legal contract and ALL OF THAT PLUS  MERS broke the chain and should kill any other legal contract.  .  This ruling is farsical.  They should sue them for fraud and go after all of them and the judge criminally. This makes me mad. Who was the original lender?  That is where it all starts and has to finish with a clean chain.  I find this case to be highly deceptive. This means any pretender lender can sell the bad paper to anyone and they can steal your home to collect on this fraud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could First Franklin be granted the foreclosure? There were obviously many laws broken here and no clean chain of title and then therefore this mortgage could NEVER, EVER be a secured debt. The debt has to be secured at the ORIGINATION. This foreclosure should be illegal. How is First Franklin  entitled to a judgement as a matter of law?  WHAT LAW DID THEY FOLLOW? They bought a bad debt is what they did.  The PSA cannot be complied with at this late date and one of these lenders broke the law and the legal contract and ALL OF THAT PLUS  MERS broke the chain and should kill any other legal contract.  .  This ruling is farsical.  They should sue them for fraud and go after all of them and the judge criminally. This makes me mad. Who was the original lender?  That is where it all starts and has to finish with a clean chain.  I find this case to be highly deceptive. This means any pretender lender can sell the bad paper to anyone and they can steal your home to collect on this fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: l vent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[l vent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36026&quot;&gt;leapfrog&lt;/a&gt;.

I heard  about this today on Bloomberg news that AIG now wants to invest in European RMBS&#039;s.  They have a gambling sickness up on foreign owned and operated Wall Street and continue to party on. AIG is not  American owned, it is a foreign owned and operated multnational corp.  Let the World Bank/VATICAN/JESUITS bail the bastards out next time, they own them. The American people want to purge themselves of all of this evil and declare our National Sovereignty from this ongoing foreign owned and operated Multinational enterprise A/K/A THE U.N.NEW WORLD ORDER. DEATH THE THE FOREIGN  MULTINATIONAL TYRANNY!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36026">leapfrog</a>.</p>
<p>I heard  about this today on Bloomberg news that AIG now wants to invest in European RMBS&#8217;s.  They have a gambling sickness up on foreign owned and operated Wall Street and continue to party on. AIG is not  American owned, it is a foreign owned and operated multnational corp.  Let the World Bank/VATICAN/JESUITS bail the bastards out next time, they own them. The American people want to purge themselves of all of this evil and declare our National Sovereignty from this ongoing foreign owned and operated Multinational enterprise A/K/A THE U.N.NEW WORLD ORDER. DEATH THE THE FOREIGN  MULTINATIONAL TYRANNY!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty, Foe of Tyranny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is good news. But it brings some bad news in tow.

Page 7, last paragraph, 3rd sentence:

&quot;The Court grants Defendants&#039; Motion for a judgment of foreclosure, in favor of First Franklin...&quot;

So Hendricks made some good arguments and the court seemed to rule on them appropriately. The court also granted foreclosure to First Franklin so Hendricks lost his property anyway, just to another party.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is good news. But it brings some bad news in tow.</p>
<p>Page 7, last paragraph, 3rd sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Court grants Defendants&#8217; Motion for a judgment of foreclosure, in favor of First Franklin&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So Hendricks made some good arguments and the court seemed to rule on them appropriately. The court also granted foreclosure to First Franklin so Hendricks lost his property anyway, just to another party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: leapfrog		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leapfrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36023&quot;&gt;Bryan&lt;/a&gt;.

Speaking of TBTF, AIG is searching for more tax-payer bailouts...check this out.

&quot;Just when one thought every imaginable taxpayer bailout scheme had been seen, experienced and in many cases, forgotten, here comes AIG once again. The specifics come from Deutsche Bank&#039;s Joshua Shanker initiation of coverage report on AIG (naturally with a Buy rating, $34.00 target price), where within the fine print he notes: &quot;the company believes there may be bargains available from buying RMBS securities from European banks seeking better positioning under Basel III requirements. &quot; Prudently, he adds: &quot;We note that increased yield, in this regard, also carries with it increased risk.&quot; Translated this means that AIG is about to do for European banks what the ECB so far has been unwilling and/or unable: namely to transfer the risk associated with European banks&#039; massive ongoing exposure to the continuously collapsing US housing market back to the US taxpayer, in the form of AIG, which was bailed out once, and which will certainly be bailed out again, when the time comes.&quot;

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-taxpayers-about-be-saddled-another-european-bailout-courtesy-aig]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36023">Bryan</a>.</p>
<p>Speaking of TBTF, AIG is searching for more tax-payer bailouts&#8230;check this out.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just when one thought every imaginable taxpayer bailout scheme had been seen, experienced and in many cases, forgotten, here comes AIG once again. The specifics come from Deutsche Bank&#8217;s Joshua Shanker initiation of coverage report on AIG (naturally with a Buy rating, $34.00 target price), where within the fine print he notes: &#8220;the company believes there may be bargains available from buying RMBS securities from European banks seeking better positioning under Basel III requirements. &#8221; Prudently, he adds: &#8220;We note that increased yield, in this regard, also carries with it increased risk.&#8221; Translated this means that AIG is about to do for European banks what the ECB so far has been unwilling and/or unable: namely to transfer the risk associated with European banks&#8217; massive ongoing exposure to the continuously collapsing US housing market back to the US taxpayer, in the form of AIG, which was bailed out once, and which will certainly be bailed out again, when the time comes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-taxpayers-about-be-saddled-another-european-bailout-courtesy-aig" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-taxpayers-about-be-saddled-another-european-bailout-courtesy-aig</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: leapfrog		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leapfrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gosh, I love that term....&quot;bonus securitization fail&quot; and the picture says 1000 words...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I love that term&#8230;.&#8221;bonus securitization fail&#8221; and the picture says 1000 words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bryan		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/06/09/kaboom-hendricks-v-u-s-bank-bofa-mi-court-destroys-mers-finds-mers-transferred-nothing-with-bonus-securitization-fail/#comment-36023</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=26417#comment-36023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EVERYONE, needs to email this case to every elected person on the hill. They need to know that we are not asleep. We know how our counrty has been infected with the greed and fraud of the too big to fail.

Elections are coming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVERYONE, needs to email this case to every elected person on the hill. They need to know that we are not asleep. We know how our counrty has been infected with the greed and fraud of the too big to fail.</p>
<p>Elections are coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
