Comments on: Scalia Sets Standard for Massive Mortgage Fraud Class Action Law Suit

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:19:36 +0000

In reply to Ron Moss.

Those are some goodies to use as a defense.

“The constitution states that Congress shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.

And, the supreme Court, in 1937 ruled,”/ Congress cannot abdicate it’s duty.”

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:16:41 +0000

I wonder what is going on with all the banks suing each other. Can they sue each other then file bankruptcy? What irony... Oh but they print all the federal reserve notes anyway, then demand payment in actual substance. Oh wait.. they file bankruptcy, then demand repayment on the fraudulent loans they made with paper that's right I forgot. roflmao I thought they were all lawyers, and suppose to know the law. If they are suppose to know the law, then they should be held accountable. They have no excuse. Their own law says so. "Ignorance of fact may excuse, but not ignorance of law". AND "Ignorance of the Law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a sworn officer of the law". Unless there are NO sworn officers in their institutions. Maxims of law also says: Usury is odious in law. [Exodus 22:25, Leviticus 25:36-37, Nehemiah 5:7,10, Proverbs 28:8, Ezekiel 18:8,13,17; 22:12] The biggest part of anything to be called fraud, was when we gave them a security instrument called a NOTE, it was suppose to be set off to the National Debt right? And that is when the Banks came up with this grand idea of saying "here is a LOAN now pay THAT back with usury". They can call it private or public or anything they want, it is still usury. I think I remember back in the day the devil and God made an agreement while Satan negotiated with God about the hedge around JOB. The agreement was basically he couldn't kill him. With that in mind.. we have been killing ourselves.. simply because the advisory caused many to believe a lie, and cause separation, division, and strife. How can two people walk together if they are not in agreement? So now that the "powers that be" have done a good job at causing separation, division, and an unequal people, how do we get back together? "Do we not all have one Father? Hath not one God created us all?"

By: lvent

lvent — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:11:00 +0000

The Supreme Court is on a 3 month summer vacation and at least 3 Supreme Court Justices are “teaching” over in ITALY on their summer vacation. HOW LOVELY!!! They don’t give a RAT’S ASS about the AMERICAN people. They are all owned by the NEW WORLD ORDER TYRANNY. THEY SHOULD ALL RESIGN. THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT AND — USELESS. NO ONE SHOULD GET A LIFETIME APPOINTMENT IN A GOVERNMENT JOB.. THAT IS A/K/A A DICTATORSHIP.

By: Shelley Ann Erickson

Shelley Ann Erickson — Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:33:50 +0000

Correct me if I am wrong. My outlook on this is I find class action lawsuits to pay little but satisfaction to the people who sign up. You can not go after anything decent. So if the banks want to settle for less, they could hire an attorney that would get a settlement, give you pennies if that maybe 20.00 or thirty dollars each and make off like banditts themselves and prevent the people who signed up from a real law suit action. It would pay the banks to send in attorneys like that. Only the people after that sued that did not agree to a small payment would benefit from the class action. Make sure you never intend to sue for something more than satisfaction and I know I trust no one. A class action could actually help keep the banks from paying out more on law suits. The only one I would join out of satisfaction and nowing I will never sue the fed and knowing anonomous has done a lot of good for this country is the one against the fed by anonomous, being put together..

By: Ron Moss

Ron Moss — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:57:52 +0000

If our national debt is the direct rresult of FRAUD. it looks to me that it should be void or voidable. The constitution states that Congrewss shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.

And, the supreme Court, in 1937 ruled,”/ Congress cannot abdicate it’s duty.

By: Lie all of it

Lie all of it — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:10:53 +0000

DOesnt any one find it strange how they r complaining about our economy but if 25% of us are either unemployed or underemployed (we dont get the real nubers ever) that is how much federal taxes not paid because we r not working enough why do our whinny elected offials fail to recognize the corelation? we need our billion dollar bailout

By: coolpillow

coolpillow — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:05:41 +0000

If any attorneys actually DO have the brass ones to start a 50 State Class Action suit- SIGN ME UP !

I hope they nail the banks, the servicers and the foreclosure mill attorneys.

And I want to see Bawney Fwank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, Franklin Reigns and the rest-dressed in ornage jumpsuits and frogmarched into Gitmo!

By: Readdocs

Readdocs — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:23:34 +0000

Nothing will effectively be done to stop this and reverse the damages until it’s too late. The whole structure of

buying and owning private property will have to collapse before anyone steps up and puts a permanent stop to

it. By that time millions more titles will have been permanently damaged beyond repair. it will be too late when

the ones who could have corrected this get a good stare at what has been done.

By: lvent

lvent — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:16:03 +0000

They are not kidding anyone, MERS is no more than a WASHING MACHINE FOR FRAUD.. Fannie Mae uses their Bankster/Mortgage Lender/Servicer minions to launder their fraud through MERS and mix it up so to take the heat off of Fannie Mae, the ORIGINATORS OF THE MORTGAGE FRAUD PONZI SCHEME. It is like Where’s Waldo? WALDO IS FANNIE MAE. BUST ‘EM.

By: Scotty Simpson

Scotty Simpson — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:16:37 +0000

Now who or which law firm has the BALL’s to stand up against MERS and Fannie Mae, Freddies Mac and all the other big Banks with deep pockets in Congress? The law suits I have seen is the Banks, we the Tax Payers bailed out giving the money back to the rich.