It is odd that the Judge who signed this order is the Hon Peter Fox Cohalan.
Remember when he was the Judge of the week?
Maybe this is going to have a different turn of events.

Beth A.I concur and I can only hope

If only…

THIS IS A BANKSTER TYRANNY!!
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT MUST NOT ALLOW THIS FINANCIAL TERRORISM TO CONTINUE.
THE BANKSTERS ARE ROBBING THE PEOPLE BECA– USE THE BANKSTERS HID OUR WEALTH THEY STOLE FROM US IN FOREIGN LANDS AND THERE BALANCE SHEETS ARE EMPTY BECA– USE THE ASSUMED TO MUCH RISK AND HID STOLE OUR WEALTH, PRIVATIZED IT OVERSEAS AND SOCIALIZED THE DEBT THEY CREATED FALSELY ON TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE..
THIS WAS THE BIGGEST TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM MAIN STREET VIA WALL STREET TO THE RULING ELITE IN HISTORY……
THIS WAS AND STILL IS A GIANT PONZI SCHEME SWINDLE AND HEIST.
BLOOMBERG REPORTED LAST WEEK TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN MORTGAGES GOES TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND THEY BUY TREASURIES WITH THE MONEY..
THIS IS A GLOBAL TYRANNY, A KLEPTOCRACY RAN BY OLIGARCHS.

THEY ARE CROOKS AND THEY ARE FAKE BROKE..
ONLY BROKE ON THE BANKS BALANCE SHEETS.
OBAMA AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEIZE THEIR OVERSEAS BANKSTER ACCOUNTS, LIKE THEY DID TO QUADAFFI. THAT IS THE STOLEN WEALTH OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
THESE NEW WORLD ORDER BANKS ARE WORSE TERRORISTS, THEY ARE FINANCIAL TERRORISTS WHO HAVE — USED AND ARE USING FINANCIAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION TO ANNIHLATE AMERICA. AND THE WORLD WITH FAKE DEBT.
FORCE THE BANKSTERS PAY FOR ALL OF THEIR FRAUD. NOT THE PEOPLE.

2) I think any lawyer who represents any of the home owners would move to have each action severed and make them PROVE they are the real party in intrest and PROVE the loan was not satisfied. It is not for the defendant to have to prove after Plaintiff recorded a satisfaction. The burden of proof falls, in this case, very heavily on the Plaintiff and if defended wall they probably won’t be able to.

3) I also think a competent lawyer would move to sever the defendants into desperate actions. Lots of sound reasons for that.

4) I don’t know NY law, but I suspect that once a note becomes stand alone and unsecured, while it is still collectable, it is no longer a secured note. I don’t think you can go and force people to provide security after the fact. The bank must first get a judgment on the note balance, then, if the person still owns the home or other assets, see if they can attach the judgement to that property.

Every person on this list of defendants needs to get a lawyer fast, and file a motion to dismiss, before Plaintiff(s)(s) get a default and default judgement.

If you name is on the above list, get thine self to a lawyer, fast. While you may not get a free house, you may prevent any future foreclosure on the mortgage, even if you are behind or don’t pay.

The banks have cooked their own goose. You can’t un-cook, at least they should not be able too.