Hello and your reply is much appreciated; times are tough and feedback is soothing; one looks for it (admittedly).

Hereabouts, resident-passion seems past and I do feel I get a lot out of all the posts; different boons.

Not trying to be patronizing but actually as an older person I many times yearn for past days when I myself felt more fully the ‘fire in belly’, but I acknowledge the rant phenomenon is an online longtime Netizen feature, yes, part of the Internet ‘thing’.

Thanks again, with warm regards, hope you’ll write, eif.
elders.in.foreclosure@gmail.com.

Thank heavens for a poster with some ability to advance legal analysis and reasoning. I stopped posting because the posts on this site have become overburdended with the emotional rants of IVENTs crowd adding no useful knowlege to the readership.

Thank you.

For general intent crime it can be enough to sense know feel intuit surmise guess conjecture hypothesize speculate wonder or suspect (as a verb), for example, that an act shouldn’t be done; or there could be just a “should have realized” sense in the air – and its a gotcha and fine or jail.

elders.in.foreclosure@gmail.com

WHERE’S THE HANDCUFFS???????????????????????????/

Oops ruth ann sorry I did not see your prior post … was typing not ignoring. EIF..

It has to do with whether there is a perceived DUTY or not. Will not take up your time to discuss whose perception of DUTY, or mechanisms for enforcement, at least not yet. And the DUTY thing pertains to all of us, Sheriffs and Shire-Reefs too (as a timely example).

For instance (with tongue-crazy-glue-welded to cheek wall) say a released prisoner has a duty not to violate a specific parole condition like “Okay, so promise you won’t trash-out houses that have weeds around them (buzz buzz “inventory”) or other such stuff, or other stuff we won’t list but you get the thread. Promise?” “Yes (hypothetically) I promise”.

We here, from the report(s), know the rest of the present hypo – the promise is made. Ah, fresh air… but then in actual practice its not kept and in epilogue the world cares about “justice” due to a shocked sense of duty-violative behavior – that aint right surely.

Zo … What is needed for argument and action is a plausible and court creditable DUTY on the part of banks (‘cuz we’re discussing banks, but it’s systemic). And btw, what is a list of their duties?

That is- What can we suggest:, maybe (top of the head) “The ‘ DUTY of fair dealing’? ”

Looking forward to comments, and extending regards to all including lurkers,

from elders-in-foreclosure@gmail.com

P.s. There’s a start. Robo-signing protests suggest a sense of violated DUTY .. . somewhere somehow.
Ivent’s right on the mark – get your facts in a row. If its possible.