<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Registers of Deeds, Andrea F. Nuciforo Jr. Says Southern and Northern District Registries Owed a Collective $775,000 in MERS Fees	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 16:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: AliceN.Wunderland		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/#comment-60881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AliceN.Wunderland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30451#comment-60881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/#comment-59651&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

Mark, the assignment can only be filed if the fee is paid.  There are two issues here.  

1) In the majority of cases there were no assignments filed at all.  The creators of MERS decided they would keep the records on there system,  thus saving the servicers money when rights to servicing were transferred/assigned.  The chain of title was broken when the assignments were not recorded.  The counties lost millions of dollars that the taxpayers had to make up by increases in property taxes due to lost revenue.  

2)Most of the assignments that were actually filed were robo-signed even tho the fee was paid to record them.  The assignment is therefore not  valid because it was fraudulent when it was recorded.  The Servicers/debt collectors are having the court accept the fraudulent documents making the court  complicit in the fraud.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/#comment-59651">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>Mark, the assignment can only be filed if the fee is paid.  There are two issues here.  </p>
<p>1) In the majority of cases there were no assignments filed at all.  The creators of MERS decided they would keep the records on there system,  thus saving the servicers money when rights to servicing were transferred/assigned.  The chain of title was broken when the assignments were not recorded.  The counties lost millions of dollars that the taxpayers had to make up by increases in property taxes due to lost revenue.  </p>
<p>2)Most of the assignments that were actually filed were robo-signed even tho the fee was paid to record them.  The assignment is therefore not  valid because it was fraudulent when it was recorded.  The Servicers/debt collectors are having the court accept the fraudulent documents making the court  complicit in the fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/15/registers-of-deeds-andrea-f-nuciforo-jr-says-southern-and-northern-district-registries-owed-a-collective-775000-in-mers-fees/#comment-59651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30451#comment-59651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does this mean that if the $75.00 fee is not paid up front that the assinmentis not Valid?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that if the $75.00 fee is not paid up front that the assinmentis not Valid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
