<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MTD Denied &#124; FDIC has to Face a $10 Billion Lawsuit Tied to the Failure of Washington Mutual Bank	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Moss		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-73050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Moss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-73050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FDIC also said they would not accept IndyMac liabilities but shifted them on to OneWest, But how do you pick a number of punitive damage for  a billionaire to discourage him from efer wanting to return to the scene of the crime and consdiser ever recommoting the same crime again?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDIC also said they would not accept IndyMac liabilities but shifted them on to OneWest, But how do you pick a number of punitive damage for  a billionaire to discourage him from efer wanting to return to the scene of the crime and consdiser ever recommoting the same crime again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beth A.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-67369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They want it ALLLLLLLLL....until there is some financial or criminal liablity attached to it, that is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want it ALLLLLLLLL&#8230;.until there is some financial or criminal liablity attached to it, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marilyn Abdilla		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marilyn Abdilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-67312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Up to last summer 2010, Chase and the FDIC had NOT signed the final purchase agreement.  I believe that is when the lawsuit started also.  It was to be signed in August 2010...but nothing was ever said nor can be found on internet if they did finalize the agreement.....Does any one know?   The question at the time was...if it was not signed...did Chase have the right to foreclosure on mortgages from WaMu.....this all is hanging in mid air for those who had WaMu  mortgage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up to last summer 2010, Chase and the FDIC had NOT signed the final purchase agreement.  I believe that is when the lawsuit started also.  It was to be signed in August 2010&#8230;but nothing was ever said nor can be found on internet if they did finalize the agreement&#8230;..Does any one know?   The question at the time was&#8230;if it was not signed&#8230;did Chase have the right to foreclosure on mortgages from WaMu&#8230;..this all is hanging in mid air for those who had WaMu  mortgage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SoSo		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SoSo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-67310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67270&quot;&gt;PJ&lt;/a&gt;.

RIGHT ON!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67270">PJ</a>.</p>
<p>RIGHT ON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PJ		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-67270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These regulators, judges, lawyers pretend not to know their own laws and rules -- Simply put, Chase bought it - Chase should eat it because Chase bank has done the exact same thing to the little guy ON MAIN STREETS OF AMERICA and gets away with it each and every time -- Denying any liability -- NOT SO -- UNDER THE FTC HOLDER RULE 16CFR433, WHICH STATES THAT THE ASSIGNEE (CHASE BANK) IS LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIMS THAT CAN BE ASSERTED AGAINST THE SELLER -- NOW PAY ME YOU BASTARD!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These regulators, judges, lawyers pretend not to know their own laws and rules &#8212; Simply put, Chase bought it &#8211; Chase should eat it because Chase bank has done the exact same thing to the little guy ON MAIN STREETS OF AMERICA and gets away with it each and every time &#8212; Denying any liability &#8212; NOT SO &#8212; UNDER THE FTC HOLDER RULE 16CFR433, WHICH STATES THAT THE ASSIGNEE (CHASE BANK) IS LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIMS THAT CAN BE ASSERTED AGAINST THE SELLER &#8212; NOW PAY ME YOU BASTARD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Moss		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/08/24/mtd-denied-fdic-has-to-face-a-10-billion-lawsuit-tied-to-the-failure-of-washington-mutual-bank/#comment-67247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Moss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=30883#comment-67247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my casae. a letter from a FDIC lawyer said they would not pay even if the state judge said they shoulg as they took over for IndyMac. How they got the authority over our state Judge I don&#039;t know But they seem to think they had.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my casae. a letter from a FDIC lawyer said they would not pay even if the state judge said they shoulg as they took over for IndyMac. How they got the authority over our state Judge I don&#8217;t know But they seem to think they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
