Comments on: Complaint | RICO Case Against JP Morgan/Chase – LINDA ZIMMERMAN V JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA

By: Kim

Kim — Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:51:22 +0000

In reply to Ameliaxoxo. I was so excited about the Zimmerman deal and was ready to hire Barnes...and then I read the reviews. I have a huge case. I need a referral please!

By: Kim

Kim — Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:48:24 +0000

In reply to Malco. You are so right. But I am an individual whose life was destroyed by JPMC and have a solid case. I need a referral. Only 2 more years on a RICO case.

By: CAKat

CAKat — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:55:14 +0000

I have a loan that was originated via Washington Mutual for interest only with optional payments which I later learned was considered a predatory type of loan. Chase began servicing the loan a couple of years later and when I got into a situation where I realized I needed a modification I worked diligenty, almost as if it was a part time job over the course of a year to try to obtain a modification. I sent hundreds of documents requested and rerequested, always informing that I did not live in the duplex and that it was a rental. Chase persisted to ask with every call if I lived there and I always said I did not. At every chance when I wrote and I have proof of more than 35 faxed letters to them, I said I was applying for a modification for a non-owner-occupied loan. At every chance when I was given the wrong forms, forms for the HAMP program and others for which I was not qualified I would object and point out I did not live in the duplex. Then I was, it almost seemed, offered something that looked like I would have to pay much more than I was already in that it extended the loan that I already paid nearly $100k on in interest over five year to another 40 years with a slightly reduced rate for only five years and then back higher for 35 years. The loan is about $345k and I was told the property would be lucky to bring half that amount at sale. I have a 93-year old tenant so am afraid to abandon him to the wolves. I have had a negative cash flow of more than $400 per month for the entire time of the loan.

I explain all this because I would sure be glad for any help or referrals to help. I asked Chase if they own the loan and they said they did and I put in a written qualified request to see my loan documents and after about six months or more they said they had no documents responsive to my request. If I could get a reasonable payment that was not interest only I would fight to keep it but right now all I got was this 40 year extended debt that would keep me at several hundred dollars per month negative of a debt that far exceeds value. I wonder if the case above pertains to CA residents where I am? I think there is fraud involved in my case, too.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:38:35 +0000

In reply to lvent.

looks like FBR could very well be an investment bank….Who cares what they think?…They are all criminals too.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:33:55 +0000

In reply to CaitlinO.

They want a nation of renters…that is what the goal is here…Global Communism by the ruling elite….The Healthcare Insurance Industry is another Ponzi Scheme…….Who disperses the “money” when we file a claim? Do we get a check to pay the dr or hospital??…No because 4 entities own this massive Oligarchy and they have hijacked the world and are a false ruling Plutocracy.,…The U.S. GOVERNMENT is acting as a Kleptocracy for the RULING ELITE and ARE VERY DECPTIVE AS WELL, allowing them to STEAL EVERYTHING FROM THE PEOPLE….ANY SETTLEMENT WITH THESE CRIMINALS IS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…..I WOULD NEVER SIGN OR AGREE TO ANYTHING THEY OFFER……THIS IS A SET UP…….WE THE PEOPLE MUST DEMAND A FULL LOAN RECISSION WITH CLEAR TITLE BACK TO US OR ALL HELL IS GOING TO BREAK LOOSE… BURN BABY BURN…

By: CaitlinO

CaitlinO — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:15:07 +0000

Here was a post put up at Naked Capitalism regarding the State Attorney General agreement. I chimed in with a smiliar question/comment.

Any legal eagles know the answer to our questions?

Cheyenne says:
September 6, 2011 at 6:57 am

Here’s what I never got about any settlement that can be reached between state AGs and robo-signing banks.

Let’s say a pro-bank settlement is reached tomorrow. And that on Friday, B of A submits robo-signed papers in a foreclosure lawsuit in state court somewhere, and the homeowner contests BAC’s standing on grounds that its proof of legal injury is a nullity and was indeed forged.

Would BAC actually point to the broad settlement in its effort to litigate the foreclosure issue? If so, wouldn’t the homeowner argue that “I wasn’t a party to the settlement and thus waived no legal claim”? And wouldn’t the court point out that the settlement is neither stare decisis nor legislation and thus at best non-binding authority?

What exactly would the scope of any settlement be? Sorry for sounding ignorant, but it just doesn’t seem possible for state AGs, however inept or corrupt, to sweep the banks’ real monster under the rug. And that doesn’t even get to the question of whether every prior foreclosure judgment hinged on robo-signed documents is altogether void, since standing is a jurisdictional issue…
Reply

*
CaitlinO says:
September 6, 2011 at 12:06 pm

That’s my question, too. There’s a filing for RICO action up at 4closurefraud right now against Chase with some two dozen named plaintiffs in 8 states. Can bank-fellating Pam Bondi really disappear a law suit like this which includes non-FL citizens just by signing Miller’s agreement? If I were a plaintiff, it absolutely would not make sense that I would be prohibited from seeking damages for wrongs done to me because some bimbo in another state would rather serve banks than people.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:09:06 +0000

In reply to lvent.

Now you guys know i meant gold or silver, not golf or silver…I do think I need to go play some golf though….and have a few beers..

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:07:11 +0000

In reply to Ameliaxoxo.

Bloomberg reporting FBR saying the U.S. must stop sueing the banks and making them do put backs… I don’t know who they are but screw them….The Pres of the World Bank is saying there will most likely not be a world wide double dip recession…..Who the F cares what they say?..THEY NEED TO GET OUT OF AMERICA AND GO BACK TO HELL FROM WHERE THEY CAME…They are the very ruling elite bastards who designed and caused this manufactured Global economic crisis. They can stick their ONE WORLD CURRENCY up their reptilian blood line assses..Time for the U.S Government to issue its own currency as the Constitution states backed by golf or silver…Anything else is TREASON…..Time to put an end to the World Bank and their money and debt counterfeiting operation….They have taken this way beyond the pale…..They ordered 9/11 to cover up for all of this…America must Abolish the Fed, remove itself from its U.N. membership, take the money and the secret societies out of politics….. and declare its independance from this Fascist Global New World Order Tyranny.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:49:41 +0000

In reply to Malco.

No, I think he wished death on Brian Moynihan..no matter, this is getting ridiculous.. This is a great example of why there should have been loan recissions a long time ago…But NO and why? Because this is all about socialism and making us a nation of renters…..Next step COMMUNISM…..I can see the vigilantes are out there…People are mad as hell and who can blame them really?….Personal attacks at fellow americans are despicable though….that makes me think he is not even in foreclosure…..A NWO order troll telling us this all the banks fault when I know they are evil but they were carrying out orders for the ruling elite……Just like the Gestapo did for Hitler…They all need to be exposed and routed out… or this is never going away.

By: lvent

lvent — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:37:04 +0000

In reply to Malco.

Thanks leapfrog….I don’t like to go to that level but this one asked for it..He actually wished death upon me…….Can’t get any more evil than that…..