Comments on: OHIO BAR | Robo-signing has far-reaching legal implications (CLE)

By: Joe

Joe — Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:28:43 +0000

It’s simple. Of course it’s horribly illegal. Along with a variety of other things bankers do. But they are special, their money has bought (bribed) them special privileges. They are never held accountable for anything. When was the last time you saw someone from the banking cartel go to prison? It doesn’t matter what court you go to, low or high, no one would ever punish a banker. But if you get caught filling out one line of one of the gazillion government forms that you need to fill out during your lifetime, you’re going to prison!

By: Litgant

Litgant — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:24:42 +0000

Once a robo-signer should be a criminal. They are lying under oath. They are making false legal documents to deceive a court. They are committing perjury. They should be held to the same standard as a witness in any trial. Robo-signing is allowed because there is no agency to whom to make a complaint of this fraud. When the legislature makes it illegal for robo-signing and attesting to material facts and they are perjured witnesses, then the State’s Attorney can come in and enforce the law and put these people in jail for violation of the Rico Act. Until then, all the crying about robo-signing and there is no enforcement mechanism, is all just that crying. No sympathy from the legislature in Florida or they would have long ago made it illegal for these robo-signers.

By: David Robert

David Robert — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:51:48 +0000

once an addict always an addict, once a robo-signer always a robo-signer.