Comments on: BofA Robo-Digital-Signer Fail (clicked WRONG name on drop down box) & Robo-Notary

By: Shelley A. Erickson

Shelley A. Erickson — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:51:00 +0000

In reply to see. That is part of the fraud, They can't. This one is really good. The notory is declaring she is witnessing Tanner Deaton, but Megan Beardall is signing.

By: Shelley A. Erickson

Shelley A. Erickson — Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:48:50 +0000

In reply to Randolph (Randy) Frodsham. All notories I have had notorize for me have had a journal. I am in Washington State. I did not realize Washington does not require it. It is pretty bad Kirt Larsen witnesses over and over that Megan Beardall is signing for Tanner Deaton on multiple docs. And declaring Tanner Deaton is the one signing . Maybe Tanner Deaton has a split personality. S.M has turned them into Rob McKenna our A.G.

By: JamesM

JamesM — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:29:03 +0000

It is obvious that the identical signatures were produced digitally. But NONE of the signatures comply with the requirements of electronically signed documents.

Moreover it is obvious that a program has been created to generate the documents to appear like hand signed documents. One is fellony fraud, 2 or more, done interstate(Utah – Washington),, with a provable pattern of fraud, by an identifiable organization or enterprise, is Felony RICO. Also gives rise to Civil RICO claims in states that allow a civil RICO action.

By: Randolph (Randy) Frodsham

Randolph (Randy) Frodsham — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0000

And Washington State does NOT require that notaries public maintain a journal of notarial acts as a record.

By: see

see — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:21:34 +0000

I have a question and I hope it is that not way off. If there is an electonic signature, how can the notary say the person “personally appeared” before them? We all know that it could not happen so how can any of those documents ever be conceived as legal because there is a direct lie from the notary? And have many people who brought these lies to the court ever won?

By: talktotennessee

talktotennessee — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:31:17 +0000

I love the part about “personally appeared before me today” don’t you that the notary “swore” to!
Documents mean nothing, notary is worthless, nothing is as it seems. White is black, black is white as some of our people always say:)

By: foreclosureweary

foreclosureweary — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:20:10 +0000

I have Recontrust documents where the notary signed 3 days after the robo-signer–BOA uses Recontrust to steal the houses, mostly in non-judicial states–they’re going down–at least 3 states are suing them

By: Officer of the Law

Officer of the Law — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:15:42 +0000

Don’t worry. The Feds and the states AGs have teams working around the clock to investigate all of this fraud. At least, they have a clock in the middle of their offices so that they don’t look like they are lying when they say that they are working around the clock to keep us safe from terrorists, or is it banksters?

By: housemanrob

housemanrob — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:02:28 +0000

….on and on and on and around we go……….on this radically evil merry-go-round!

By: lvent

lvent — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:09:39 +0000

What about the FAKE notaries who work for the title and trust companies…..the SO-CALLED ESCROWEES…WHO ARE ALSO LICENSED ILLINOIS NOTARIES WHO are also NOTARIES FOR THE BANK……!!!!!! THAT WERE NEVER AT THE CLOSING……!!!! EITHER THE TITLE COMPANY ALTERED DOCS AFTER THE CLOSING OR THE BANK DID….EITHER WAY THE GUILT IS EQUAL…