<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FL 3rd DCA &#124; Sarhan v. H &#038; H Investors, Inc. &#8211; Defect In Stipulation Agreement Left Judge Without Jurisdiction To Summarily Enter Foreclosure Judgment Upon Subsequent Default	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/10/25/fl-3rd-dca-sarhan-v-h-h-investors-inc-defect-in-stipulation-agreement-left-judge-without-jurisdiction-to-summarily-enter-foreclosure-judgment-upon-subsequent-default/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/10/25/fl-3rd-dca-sarhan-v-h-h-investors-inc-defect-in-stipulation-agreement-left-judge-without-jurisdiction-to-summarily-enter-foreclosure-judgment-upon-subsequent-default/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
