“independent consultants hired by lenders also began combing industry data to look for mistakes in foreclosure cases”

“a federal investigation last year found “significant weaknesses” in mortgage servicer practices.”

Mistakes? Weaknesses? What they need to be looking for is deliberate fraud.

Adam Levitin did a great post showing some ads for these supposed “independent consultants.” Temp agencies are looking for, essentially, clerks at an hourly wage equivalent to a housekeeper’s, to do the job of attorneys/white collar criminal investigators trained in document analysis, property law, forensic title searches, determination of harm, etc.

See his great article and follow up at:

http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2011/10/robosigning2.html

Levitin says “I have seldom seen a document that says more about the bullshit malarkey that the OCC and Fed are trying to pass off to cover for the banks than this job ad.”

http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2011/10/more-on-foreclosure-file-reviewers.html

Levitin says “What’s particularly interesting about this ad is that it references “Promontory/OCC guidelines.” .. .. .. Given Promontory’s previous consulting gigs, including Countrywide, their involvement seems rife with potential conflicts.”

Yeah…just like the Fed’s “investigation” of wrongful foreclosures last February…they found not a one…cherry-picked all the files beforehand.

We need the ‘Smells Like Bullshit’ lady as a caption for this story.

October 14, 2011

Re: Case No. 01751312
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA

BARRY S FAGAN- Complainant/Plaintiff
Los Angeles Superior Court Case SC112044

SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE OF BANK DOCUMENT FRAUD

A.VIOLATIONS OF THE OCC CONSENT ORDER DATED APRIL 2011

Dear Mr. Chandler:

I am in receipt of your letter dated September 6, 2011 and wish to further supplement my complaint (01751312) with additional evidence of document fraud.

Attached hereto and made a part hereof are Exhibits A through C, all of which will be filed with the Superior Court of Los Angeles CASE NUMBER SC112044 and as a result have not yet become a public record.

Contained within those exhibits, 3 different ORIGINAL Deeds of Trust.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/68896185/Barry-Fagan-v-Wells-Fargo-Bank-Re-Supplemental-Objection-to-Request-for-Judicial-Notice-With-3-Original-Deeds-of-Trust-With-Different-Page-Fours

http://www.scribd.com/doc/68820189/Barry-Fagan-v-Wells-Fargo-Bank-Re-Three-Original-Deeds-of-Trust-With-Three-Different-Page-Fours

Exhibit A is the Deed of Trust as filed with the Los Angeles County Registrar Recorders Office, while Exhibit B and Exhibit C were provided by Wells Fargo Bank as alleged original documents. The magnified version of page 4 all clearly show variations of the same hand written number and is an indication that the original Exhibit A as recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorders Office has been altered.

Kindly review the additional exhibits to see that Wells Fargo Bank’s entire loan file is wrought with errors and inconsistencies and quite frankly fraud!

So I continue to write to the regulatory authority that supposedly enforces and promulgates rules for National Banks to follow, and submit both evidence and allegations of fraud.

I believe if my case is reviewed at the highest levels, the OCC can indeed do something to prevent fraud rather than in my opinion harbor it.

Kindly forward this additional evidence to California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office so that they too can review these three exhibits for possible State prosecution of these fraudulent and criminal acts.

Sincerely,
Barry S. Fagan Esq.
Malibu, CA 90265

Any other could be slanted or they wouldn’t have come up with it.