<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Steven J. Baum &#124; Rule Affirming Foreclosure Cases are Accurate is Unconstitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>- Fighting Foreclosure Fraud BY SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 15:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Private D.A.		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-185900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private D.A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-185900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Listen up !!!  Courts can only decide things when things are put before them.  Baum says it&#039;s worth a chance to try !
What that should tell YOU, is that it&#039;s worth your while to ask a court to hold an evidentiary hearing after granting full scale discovery...and set your foreclosure aside (even if it&#039;s been foreclosed on a while back).  A good litigation atty who loves Law and Motion practice and dilligently reads evey Appellate decision should do the trick...and pay them per service, NOT on a retainer...they can probably style your case so you can recover all your costs including their fees, get you statutory penalties and maybe treble damages...and maybe your foreclosure thrown out.  Ask them how good they are at getting sanctions (and court&#039;s making referrals to the Bar) against attorneys like Baum...BTW, a legal theory could be that Stern and Baum engaged in collusion, theft by device, defrauding and mis-use of the judiciary among others...including...my oh my...RACKETEERING and financial fraud.  This is far from over.....get aggressive ! (that&#039;s what Stern and Baum did).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen up !!!  Courts can only decide things when things are put before them.  Baum says it&#8217;s worth a chance to try !<br />
What that should tell YOU, is that it&#8217;s worth your while to ask a court to hold an evidentiary hearing after granting full scale discovery&#8230;and set your foreclosure aside (even if it&#8217;s been foreclosed on a while back).  A good litigation atty who loves Law and Motion practice and dilligently reads evey Appellate decision should do the trick&#8230;and pay them per service, NOT on a retainer&#8230;they can probably style your case so you can recover all your costs including their fees, get you statutory penalties and maybe treble damages&#8230;and maybe your foreclosure thrown out.  Ask them how good they are at getting sanctions (and court&#8217;s making referrals to the Bar) against attorneys like Baum&#8230;BTW, a legal theory could be that Stern and Baum engaged in collusion, theft by device, defrauding and mis-use of the judiciary among others&#8230;including&#8230;my oh my&#8230;RACKETEERING and financial fraud.  This is far from over&#8230;..get aggressive ! (that&#8217;s what Stern and Baum did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184253&quot;&gt;lvent&lt;/a&gt;.

COCO, SORRY I MEANT TO SAY COCO...I double checked it too...sometimes too much computer can make my  vision blurry....!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184253">lvent</a>.</p>
<p>COCO, SORRY I MEANT TO SAY COCO&#8230;I double checked it too&#8230;sometimes too much computer can make my  vision blurry&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184147&quot;&gt;COCO&lt;/a&gt;.

COC, go get those dirty scumbags!  I am with you. I would try RT news...they just might put you on the air..!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184147">COCO</a>.</p>
<p>COC, go get those dirty scumbags!  I am with you. I would try RT news&#8230;they just might put you on the air..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lvent		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lvent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184133&quot;&gt;Michael Olenick&lt;/a&gt;.

If they can&#039;t use fraud to foreclose, they can&#039;t foreclose...That is why it is called fraudclosure... Max Keiser said something like... if you take fraud out of WallStreet&#039;s business model...they can no longer do business....They are criminals..this is just an ongoing pattern of fraud and abuse....prosecutable under RICO...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184133">Michael Olenick</a>.</p>
<p>If they can&#8217;t use fraud to foreclose, they can&#8217;t foreclose&#8230;That is why it is called fraudclosure&#8230; Max Keiser said something like&#8230; if you take fraud out of WallStreet&#8217;s business model&#8230;they can no longer do business&#8230;.They are criminals..this is just an ongoing pattern of fraud and abuse&#8230;.prosecutable under RICO&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: COCO		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[COCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have one that I will take to the media.  My foreclosure sale has been RESCHEDULED for the first of the year.
Bank of New York Mellon served foreclosure papers on me 12/2008.  The Assignment of Mortgage was dated 3 months after the ASM and was signed by a known robo signor.  I have filed a Motion to Vacate the Final Default Judgment and Stay the Execution of the Sheriff&#039;s Sale.  If that is denied-IT IS MEDIA HERE I COME.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one that I will take to the media.  My foreclosure sale has been RESCHEDULED for the first of the year.<br />
Bank of New York Mellon served foreclosure papers on me 12/2008.  The Assignment of Mortgage was dated 3 months after the ASM and was signed by a known robo signor.  I have filed a Motion to Vacate the Final Default Judgment and Stay the Execution of the Sheriff&#8217;s Sale.  If that is denied-IT IS MEDIA HERE I COME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Olenick		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Olenick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised the major servicers haven&#039;t all dropped him Stern-style by now.  In case any are thinking about it, consider that he was on the Board of Directors of Stern&#039;s public company, DJSP.  Those two obviously knew and trusted one another.  Cut your own losses, servicers, before you end up in a mad rush to collect 100K files: cut Baum lose.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised the major servicers haven&#8217;t all dropped him Stern-style by now.  In case any are thinking about it, consider that he was on the Board of Directors of Stern&#8217;s public company, DJSP.  Those two obviously knew and trusted one another.  Cut your own losses, servicers, before you end up in a mad rush to collect 100K files: cut Baum lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tonycat		</title>
		<link>https://4closurefraud.org/2011/11/08/steven-j-baum-rule-affirming-foreclosure-cases-are-accurate-is-unconstitutional/#comment-184110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tonycat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://4closurefraud.org/?p=35270#comment-184110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We need to find some constitutional lawyers, fast, and get some challenges going.  And we need people on the inside of the media who are in the homeowners&#039; favor to cover these court cases and get them highly visibly publicized.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to find some constitutional lawyers, fast, and get some challenges going.  And we need people on the inside of the media who are in the homeowners&#8217; favor to cover these court cases and get them highly visibly publicized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
